Porsche Sales Figures
#151
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I can't speak to the 718, as I haven't driven one. I'm comparing 981 vs. 991.
I have driven the 991.2 though, and it definitely moves the bar forward in both performance terms and comfort, so the 718 would have to be a big improvement in both of those areas to close the gap with the 991.
I have driven the 991.2 though, and it definitely moves the bar forward in both performance terms and comfort, so the 718 would have to be a big improvement in both of those areas to close the gap with the 991.
#152
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Archimedes,
I agree that seems to be the case:. The 911 has been substantially improved in comfort in addition to performance, and in doing so, it's lost some of its original appeal. The 991/718s seem to be filling that role progressively.
I agree that seems to be the case:. The 911 has been substantially improved in comfort in addition to performance, and in doing so, it's lost some of its original appeal. The 991/718s seem to be filling that role progressively.
#153
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I definitely agree with this. I think the 991.2 is grossly overpriced and I have trouble seeing where the money goes in comparison to a Cayman, which is $40k less. Inside, the cars are damned near indistinguishable. And is there really anything technical going on inside a 911 that justifies the eye-watering premium? Grossly simplified, I know. But still.
Judd
Judd
Comparing those Cayman to 911 models, only with the higher displacement engine in the Carrera S, did the 911 models have a clear performance superiority in torque and performance over the Cayman S.
It's a big reason I happily drove my 987.2 Boxster S as my first and sole Porsche for 4 years. I didn't feel the need to get a 911. Only once the 991 GT3 came out, did I feel the need to make a major upgrade to my Porsche.
I agree with you though that with the current turbo versions of these cars, Porsche has again re established a separation of the mid and rear-engine lines.
The base Carrera has 21 more ft lbs of torque over the Cayman S, and the Carrera S model has 59 ft lbs more than the Cayman. Also the 911 models have a 6 cylinder engine vs a 4 and more importantly the 911 gets twin turbos to decrease lag across a variety of engine loads and RPMs, while the Cayman only has one turbo, leading to more lag in the Cayman.
So while I didn't feel there was a clearly superiority justifying the extra expense of the 997 and 991.1 base Carreras over a Boxster/Cayman S, I've changed my mind for our current turbo powered P-cars. Not very interested in the 718 line.
#154
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: 18 year member, North Georgia
Posts: 1,343
Received 463 Likes
on
235 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I've owned six 911's (still own 3, including early small-bumper long hood cars).
I am just not interested in a Cayman or Boxster. I fully understand their performance numbers.
I am just not interested in a Cayman or Boxster. I fully understand their performance numbers.
#155
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Definitely hard to argue there was any significant performance difference between the 987.2/981 Cayman S and the base 997.2/991.1 Carrera. In fact a number of car magazines did comparisons and found 0-60 and track times were virtually identical between those mid and rear engine models.
Comparing those Cayman to 911 models, only with the higher displacement engine in the Carrera S, did the 911 models have a clear performance superiority in torque and performance over the Cayman S.
It's a big reason I happily drove my 987.2 Boxster S as my first and sole Porsche for 4 years. I didn't feel the need to get a 911. Only once the 991 GT3 came out, did I feel the need to make a major upgrade to my Porsche.
I agree with you though that with the current turbo versions of these cars, Porsche has again re established a separation of the mid and rear-engine lines.
The base Carrera has 21 more ft lbs of torque over the Cayman S, and the Carrera S model has 59 ft lbs more than the Cayman. Also the 911 models have a 6 cylinder engine vs a 4 and more importantly the 911 gets twin turbos to decrease lag across a variety of engine loads and RPMs, while the Cayman only has one turbo, leading to more lag in the Cayman.
So while I didn't feel there was a clearly superiority justifying the extra expense of the 997 and 991.1 base Carreras over a Boxster/Cayman S, I've changed my mind for our current turbo powered P-cars. Not very interested in the 718 line.
Comparing those Cayman to 911 models, only with the higher displacement engine in the Carrera S, did the 911 models have a clear performance superiority in torque and performance over the Cayman S.
It's a big reason I happily drove my 987.2 Boxster S as my first and sole Porsche for 4 years. I didn't feel the need to get a 911. Only once the 991 GT3 came out, did I feel the need to make a major upgrade to my Porsche.
I agree with you though that with the current turbo versions of these cars, Porsche has again re established a separation of the mid and rear-engine lines.
The base Carrera has 21 more ft lbs of torque over the Cayman S, and the Carrera S model has 59 ft lbs more than the Cayman. Also the 911 models have a 6 cylinder engine vs a 4 and more importantly the 911 gets twin turbos to decrease lag across a variety of engine loads and RPMs, while the Cayman only has one turbo, leading to more lag in the Cayman.
So while I didn't feel there was a clearly superiority justifying the extra expense of the 997 and 991.1 base Carreras over a Boxster/Cayman S, I've changed my mind for our current turbo powered P-cars. Not very interested in the 718 line.
Well, I don't know.
The Porsche website lists the 0-60 times for both the Cayman 718 s and the 991.2 at 4.4 seconds each. They differ by 20 HP and 21 lbft torque. The 991.2 probably weighs more which probably explains the same acceleration numbers. As I said, the cars are damned near indistinguishable on the inside, and built to the same fit and finish. And I suspect (but do not know, of course) that drive train and chassis technology is similar (if not identical) in many respects. The engines differ - sure. But the same could not have been said of last year's Cayman/boxster models.
I've no doubt the 991.2 is incrementally better, with emphasis on incrementally, EVEN IF you cannot countenance the 4 pot turbo (I, personally, have no problem with it, as I'm in my first ever Porsche now - I didn't know any different). They didn't feel much different to me. That's a HELL of a lot of extra $$$ for whatever difference there is. As I said, if I had it to do over again, I would have bought a 718 Cayman. I'd have had enough left over for an entry level Mercedes for the winter, for crying out loud!!
To each their own.
Judd
#156
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Definitely hard to argue there was any significant performance difference between the 987.2/981 Cayman S and the base 997.2/991.1 Carrera. In fact a number of car magazines did comparisons and found 0-60 and track times were virtually identical between those mid and rear engine models.
Comparing those Cayman to 911 models, only with the higher displacement engine in the Carrera S, did the 911 models have a clear performance superiority in torque and performance over the Cayman S.
.
Comparing those Cayman to 911 models, only with the higher displacement engine in the Carrera S, did the 911 models have a clear performance superiority in torque and performance over the Cayman S.
.
And as you indicate, the 991S with performance options would crush the 981S on the track. The 991S beats the Cayman S around the Ring by about 17 seconds, which is an eternity.
#157
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Porsche posted numbers are basically meaningless, as they're always conservative. Motor Trend clocked 3.4 seconds in the base 991.2. My guess us that the 718S is sub 4 seconds as well.
#160
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Wut? I'm guessing you missed this comparison, which is a base, no option 991 against a 981 Boxter S. Spoiler, the base 991 spanks the 981S and is way more composed doing it.
And as you indicate, the 991S with performance options would crush the 981S on the track. The 991S beats the Cayman S around the Ring by about 17 seconds, which is an eternity.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6N3GEahwOrI
And as you indicate, the 991S with performance options would crush the 981S on the track. The 991S beats the Cayman S around the Ring by about 17 seconds, which is an eternity.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6N3GEahwOrI
Thank you, I missed that video. Didn't know Car and Driver did that kind of overseas segment, and interesting that they used the staff from Evo, Jethro Bovington, a 911 owner himself.
However, I wouldn't say the 911 spanked the Boxster S. The 0-60 times were essentially the same. No spanking there. I do concede that the 991 won, didn't spank, but won the track test as it was a second faster around the track, which matters. Jethro didn't say anything about what tires were on both cars, however.
Since the time the Boxster was designed, the 911 has had an excellent rear multi-link suspension system, which is superior to the rear struts of a Boxster/Cayman. However, having a similar engine torque and being better balanced as a mid-engine car, I still say the 987 Cayman/Boxster S was equal to the 997 base carerra. Thats when I did most of my research was, because I was first purchased a new Porsche in the 997.2 and 987.2 era. At that time and even now, I don't think it was worth it from a performance standpoint to spend the money to buy a 997.2 base Carrera over a 987.2 Boxster/Cayman S.
However, with the 991.1 platform, the engine moved forward, and became less of a 911 and closer to a mid-engine car, which I expect in combination with the traditionally better rear suspension, is what gave the 991.1 the win in the track portion of the video.
In any case, as I previously mentioned regarding the 991.2 and 718 generation, there is now even more of a significant gap now between those cars these days. So you can rest easy, your 911 is king.......
#161
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: 18 year member, North Georgia
Posts: 1,343
Received 463 Likes
on
235 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I can't offer any pictures, but I would never, in a thousand years buy anything but a 911.
You guys are confused by the media and some sort of low-budget information.
I'm sorry that you need to worry about a few thousand dollars. The 991 is the better car if you can afford it.
You guys are confused by the media and some sort of low-budget information.
I'm sorry that you need to worry about a few thousand dollars. The 991 is the better car if you can afford it.
#162
Race Director
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by VintageRacer
I can't offer any pictures, but I would never, in a thousand years buy anything but a 911.
You guys are confused by the media and some sort of low-budget information.
I'm sorry that you need to worry about a few thousand dollars. The 991 is the better car if you can afford it.
You guys are confused by the media and some sort of low-budget information.
I'm sorry that you need to worry about a few thousand dollars. The 991 is the better car if you can afford it.
+991
And so much better looking! The new 4 banger single turbo is pathetic. Long live the GT4.
I'm not sure why this thread has gotten so off topic.
#163
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Thank you, I missed that video. Didn't know Car and Driver did that kind of overseas segment, and interesting that they used the staff from Evo, Jethro Bovington, a 911 owner himself.
However, I wouldn't say the 911 spanked the Boxster S. The 0-60 times were essentially the same. No spanking there. I do concede that the 991 won, didn't spank, but won the track test as it was a second faster around the track, which matters. Jethro didn't say anything about what tires were on both cars, however.
.
However, I wouldn't say the 911 spanked the Boxster S. The 0-60 times were essentially the same. No spanking there. I do concede that the 991 won, didn't spank, but won the track test as it was a second faster around the track, which matters. Jethro didn't say anything about what tires were on both cars, however.
.
Second, I was struck by how much more composed the 991 looked when cornering. It looks better on entry, mid corner and on exit, and that is a totally base, standard unadjustable suspension, first year 991. People forget how long Porsche has been refining that chassis and how good it is.
I loved my Cayman, but the Carrera is just on another level in every sense. The 981 Spyder was closer, but still not quite as refined.
#165
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
911 sales Australia (data from VFACTS)
2013 - 276
2014 - 366
2015 - 377
2016 - 402 to Oct (projected to 422 for 2016 in total - very conservative projection)
The Cayman and 911 debate is quite amusing - I have the 981GTS and wouldn't go near a 991.1. The 991.2 C2S changed my mind and I have one on order and I will keep the 981 GTS![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
991.2 C2S 0 - 60mph 3.1s and 1/4 mile 11.5s @ 121mph (Motor Trend). Ring time 7:34 (Chris Gebhardt - Journalist/Driver) Vs Cayman 718S 7:46.8 (Chris Gebhardt). Both ring times are blisteringly quick for road cars on street tires.
All is well in the land of Porsche
2013 - 276
2014 - 366
2015 - 377
2016 - 402 to Oct (projected to 422 for 2016 in total - very conservative projection)
The Cayman and 911 debate is quite amusing - I have the 981GTS and wouldn't go near a 991.1. The 991.2 C2S changed my mind and I have one on order and I will keep the 981 GTS
![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
991.2 C2S 0 - 60mph 3.1s and 1/4 mile 11.5s @ 121mph (Motor Trend). Ring time 7:34 (Chris Gebhardt - Journalist/Driver) Vs Cayman 718S 7:46.8 (Chris Gebhardt). Both ring times are blisteringly quick for road cars on street tires.
All is well in the land of Porsche
![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)