Which would you chose - 2015 C2 GTS or 2017 C2S?
10-16-2016, 12:19 AM
#16
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
10-16-2016, 01:40 AM
#17
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
10-16-2016, 02:10 AM
#19
Three Wheelin'
991.2 S
Its WAY faster. Its much better technology. And once cobb released its tune, this thing will be dam near close to GT3 levels.
Go 2017 and and get the the 991.2 GTS down the road.
And Im sorry to all you old farts. But the 991.2 sound WAY better than the N/A 991.1. PSsst. Haters. Jealous of that Boost.
Its WAY faster. Its much better technology. And once cobb released its tune, this thing will be dam near close to GT3 levels.
Go 2017 and and get the the 991.2 GTS down the road.
And Im sorry to all you old farts. But the 991.2 sound WAY better than the N/A 991.1. PSsst. Haters. Jealous of that Boost.
10-16-2016, 09:58 AM
#22
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Where aspirations are natural
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 0
Received 42 Likes
on
33 Posts
GTS... It will always be a more special car.
I have a C2S and not sure if I'll trade for a GTs or not one day but when I bought the GTS was beyond my price point as a cash buyer. Hopefully I can find one as cared for as mine in a couple years with similar miles.
I have a C2S and not sure if I'll trade for a GTs or not one day but when I bought the GTS was beyond my price point as a cash buyer. Hopefully I can find one as cared for as mine in a couple years with similar miles.
10-16-2016, 10:25 AM
#24
Race Director
Originally Posted by Mechanic
Am I the only one who wonders why these cars are -- from my perspective -- were traded by the first owners? There's always a reason.
Some guys go through cars quicker than ...
Common in this segment. We're not talking daily driver Honda Accords here.
10-16-2016, 10:33 AM
#25
I was in your shoes back in May. I picked a '16 GTS but the 991.2 sure looked nice. I didn't even test drive the 991.2. I knew I wanted the last N/A engine, a GTS, and sound is important to me. Yes, the turbo is faster but I'm not racing anybody and the GTS is more than fast enough for me.
10-16-2016, 10:35 AM
#26
Burning Brakes
Both cars sold new for the same price and now the asking is similar. Value wise, the 17 C2S is better. It is a current model for another 12 months. Performance favors the 17 C2S because of the new tech and motor plus RWS which is is included in the sport pack.
Either way, they are both nice cars.
Either way, they are both nice cars.
10-16-2016, 11:09 AM
#27
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
You're crazy.
Even my kids thought the .1, WITHOUT PSE, sounded better than a .2 with PSE. A lot.
10-16-2016, 11:53 AM
#28
Originally Posted by BIGWORM
991.2 S
Its WAY faster. Its much better technology. And once cobb released its tune, this thing will be dam near close to GT3 levels.
Go 2017 and and get the the 991.2 GTS down the road.
And Im sorry to all you old farts. But the 991.2 sound WAY better than the N/A 991.1. PSsst. Haters. Jealous of that Boost.
Its WAY faster. Its much better technology. And once cobb released its tune, this thing will be dam near close to GT3 levels.
Go 2017 and and get the the 991.2 GTS down the road.
And Im sorry to all you old farts. But the 991.2 sound WAY better than the N/A 991.1. PSsst. Haters. Jealous of that Boost.
Your stereotypical response and utter loss of automotive credibility have been noted!
10-16-2016, 12:04 PM
#29
If you're considering a GTS, why not get a C2S. I realize this may be a controversial opinion, but I think the GTS is a scam. The only real difference is wider rear fenders. They are nice -- but $30K-40K more expensive nice? Not to me. And the 30HP power difference is meaningless on a 400HP car. Get a really nicely optioned 991.1S or if you want the wider fenders get a 4S and save tons of money that you can spend on mods or track time. That's what I did.
