Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

McLaren Success

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-24-2017, 08:32 PM
  #571  
neoprufrok
Rennlist Member
 
neoprufrok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 675
Received 510 Likes on 166 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ranger22
I only have a few examples to go from, but from those experiences, i don't feel like mclaren's are as dependable on the track as Porsches.....yet.
Not sure what to say.. but I have 4k miles on my LT.. both track and normal driving. No problems so far. Again, only my experience, so take it with a grain of salt.
Old 03-24-2017, 08:37 PM
  #572  
neoprufrok
Rennlist Member
 
neoprufrok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 675
Received 510 Likes on 166 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bccars
I almost jumped to the Mclaren side. But Porsche managed to keep me in the flock with the 991.2 GT3.

Major reason is that Porsche is my known quantity for trackdays. I have a whole network of dealers, non official yet extremely knowledgeable specialists, track friends, regular gearhead friends all connected to the Porsche brand at my disposal that make it easy to support my car.

If Mclaren ups the ante there, on available dealers, on support in the broadest sense outside the official dealer network like aftermarket parts for trackdays, like a knowledgeable Mclaren "community" and so on, it will be very very hard to resist Mclaren again next time ...
I definitely understand the hesitance, but I think this will change. For example, I'm part of the Turn One track club at Sonoma Raceway. Quite a few of us track McLaren's. McLaren SF actually now provides track experiences there at Sonoma through the club. They also do pre and post track inspections and, as long as you do that, the car's are covered under warranty even on track.

In terms of aftermarket parts for track days - given the sheer ability of the cars, I think if you're gonna want to go faster... you should just get a dedicated track car.

Finally, it may vary with dealers, but my McLaren dealer will transport my car from their shop after track inspection to the track free of charge (I can leave there as I have garage space at the track).
Old 03-24-2017, 09:16 PM
  #573  
Drifting
Rennlist Member
 
Drifting's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Rocky Mountains
Posts: 5,154
Received 1,292 Likes on 680 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NBoost
I don't think Ferrari has to worry about McLaren eating into their customer base, if anything, Ferrari owners who want a track experience might buy a McLaren as a 27th car for track use and save their 488 for street duty. Porsche has more to lose imo amongst serious track rats with real world budgets. There are a lot of guys on the site (and probably in this thread) with one toy car (P GT) that will start defecting to McLaren for purely economical reasons. More capability, same or similar money, and a smoother buying experience with more options will make it an easy decision for many.
You make some good points. I think Porsche has more to fear from Mclaren than Ferrari. Almost everyone buying a new Porsche GT car, Ferrari 488, or Mclaren has multiple cars. The Mclaren 650S and up all have more capability on the track than the 488 or any non-918 Porsche, the Macs are much lighter than any Porsche or Ferrari, with a great suspension for track or road, and it's not a huge pain to buy a new Mclaren, like it is to buy a new Ferrari or a Porsche GT car.

On the other hand, Mclaren will not appeal to track rats who prefer manuals or a NA engine, and Mclaren brakes, while better than they used to be, are still not as predictable or as easily modulated for track work, as Porsche brakes.

Originally Posted by Archimedes
This could all be true, particularly from a track perspective, but the Ferrari is a work of art compared to the McLaren in styling terms, and, apparently, a fantastic road car with more performance than anyone could use on the street. Unless I was a track rat, I'd take the 488 GTB over the 570S all day, aluminum chassis and all.
Very true. I think the 720S styling is a step better than previous generation, but no sports car is more beautiful than a Ferrari.
All modern Mclarens and Ferraris have more performance than anyone can use on a public road. If I was looking for a 3rd or 5th car and was choosing between a Mclaren or Ferrari, it would come down to my track needs.

Basically, if only going to the track 1-2 times a year or less, I would get a Ferrari as it looks better and will hold its value better. However, if I wanted to track the car regularly, I would choose a McLaren all day over a Ferrari.

Last edited by Drifting; 03-25-2017 at 12:25 AM.
Old 03-24-2017, 10:08 PM
  #574  
Jimmy-D
Race Director
 
Jimmy-D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Midwest
Posts: 11,265
Received 1,450 Likes on 754 Posts
Default

Ferrari has very much to worry about McLaren. They are direct competitors.

Porsche has to make the decision if they want to make a mid-engine beast to compete in that upper-market. My bet is they have no other choice and they will. And probably knock it out of the park like the did on the 918

Their bigger issue now is McLaren invaiding their 911 Turbo space. That is a big issue with the 570S
Old 03-24-2017, 10:11 PM
  #575  
Archimedes
Race Director
 
Archimedes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 13,162
Received 3,869 Likes on 1,902 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by neoprufrok
They're not even in the same class
Yes, one is a drop dead gorgeous sports car borne of decades of design excellence that looks at home on the street and the other looks like the evil spawn of Optimus Prime. I'm far more likely to own a McLaren in the future than a Ferrari, but I can call a spade a spade.
Old 03-24-2017, 10:13 PM
  #576  
Archimedes
Race Director
 
Archimedes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 13,162
Received 3,869 Likes on 1,902 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jimmy-D
Ferrari has very much to worry about McLaren. They are direct competitors.

Porsche has to make the decision if they want to make a mid-engine beast to compete in that upper-market. My bet is they have no other choice and they will. And probably knock it out of the park like the did on the 918

Their bigger issue now is McLaren invaiding their 911 Turbo space. That is a big issue with the 570S
I don't think Porsche has any intention to compete with either of them in any meaningful way. I think they'll continue to just barely overlap at the upper end of Porsche and the lower end of Ferrari/McLaren/Lambo, which is the natural positioning for Porsche. That is until Ferrari starts selling $45,000 4 banger SUVs.
Old 03-24-2017, 10:20 PM
  #577  
Drifting
Rennlist Member
 
Drifting's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Rocky Mountains
Posts: 5,154
Received 1,292 Likes on 680 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Archimedes
I don't think Porsche has any intention to compete with either of them in any meaningful way. I think they'll continue to just barely overlap at the upper end of Porsche and the lower end of Ferrari/McLaren/Lambo, which is the natural positioning for Porsche. That is until Ferrari starts selling $45,000 4 banger SUVs.
Agree, and I think this might be one reason Porsche has continued to delay the 960.

Porsche the most profitable car company in the world. They own the 100K-200K cost bracket, and they make tons of money (much more than Ferrari, Mclaren or Lambo) doing what they've been doing in that cost bracket. They don't need to compete with Ferrari, Mclaren or lambo in the 200-350K bracket.

Porsche will produce a hypercar every decade or so, to show they can build something just as amazing as Ferrari or McLaren, but then go back to making their 911-based cars costing 100-200K, and continue as a company to make much more money than Ferrari or McLaren.
Old 03-24-2017, 10:23 PM
  #578  
jlee504
Rennlist Member
 
jlee504's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 2,718
Received 422 Likes on 244 Posts
Default

The turbo s and 570s are in the same price bracket but the reality is you still can't drive a 570s around town as a daily. A turbo s is still a classic looking car that won't attract all that attention.

Originally Posted by Jimmy-D
Ferrari has very much to worry about McLaren. They are direct competitors.

Porsche has to make the decision if they want to make a mid-engine beast to compete in that upper-market. My bet is they have no other choice and they will. And probably knock it out of the park like the did on the 918

Their bigger issue now is McLaren invaiding their 911 Turbo space. That is a big issue with the 570S
Old 03-24-2017, 10:31 PM
  #579  
NateOZ
Race Car
 
NateOZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: New York
Posts: 3,530
Received 29 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jlee504
The turbo s and 570s are in the same price bracket but the reality is you still can't drive a 570s around town as a daily. A turbo s is still a classic looking car that won't attract all that attention.
I drive my 570 to the supermarket most Sundays. It gets more attention than a Porsche, but it's fun to drive at street speeds - more so than the TTS and GT3 IMO.

I might throw it on the track for a session when the season starts and see how it really performs, but will depend on my track car's reliability.
Old 03-24-2017, 11:11 PM
  #580  
Leica 993
Racer
 
Leica 993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Ohio
Posts: 429
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jlee504
The turbo s and 570s are in the same price bracket but the reality is you still can't drive a 570s around town as a daily.
You can, and McLaren is making a big push so that customers know that you can enjoy a 570S everyday, just like you can enjoy a TTS, but just with a little more flair.
Old 03-24-2017, 11:22 PM
  #581  
C.J. Ichiban
Platinum Dealership
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
C.J. Ichiban's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Exit Row seats
Posts: 9,764
Received 2,057 Likes on 578 Posts
Default

The 570GT is the one to daily. Awesome car. And you can still drift them around in hoon mode.


570 sounds better than a turbo. Ferrari 458 or 488 does sound better than a 570 but a 675LT stands tall against anyone.
Old 03-27-2017, 08:15 AM
  #582  
jo_ker
Rennlist Member
 
jo_ker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Germany/Austria
Posts: 2,049
Received 484 Likes on 194 Posts
Default

my 570S (with sports exhaust) sounds inside ... how should i say: not raw/loud/etc enough.

But my comparison against 997RS, 991RS, E46/E92M3, high tune 4bangers,... is not fair. I would have to do the comparison with an upcomming 570LT.

chassis wise the feeling is fun with rigid carbon mono + regular anti roll and suspension. (i do have it lowered 15mm with a KW spring kit + 10kg harder springs)
steering is perfect. thx to 100% hydro.
drifting (not powersliding) - tough job - logical: mid engine, turbo, no lsd

the real issue is i do not get emotions out of it - as long driving below 2xx.

the turbo lag: good above 5krpm but i can´t like the boost/torque as much as i like the N/A responsiveness and sound. don´t know if i can be friend with turbos at any time soon. my supercharged Caterhams i like already - a lot!

I never read so often a 2xx or 3xx on the speedo during a normal sunday drive as i do while driving the 570s. incredible. maybe a result of to less emotions as written before... not healthy for the surrounding and the driver license.

but. if turbo for me in 2018: i would like to get a GT2RS. and so another 100k more than the 570s is worth... but. as many in here i would like to transfer the bucks to my dealer - being on my knees.
those damn beetles still own me...
Old 03-27-2017, 08:46 AM
  #583  
vtgt
Pro
 
vtgt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 673
Received 46 Likes on 37 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Drifting
Agree, and I think this might be one reason Porsche has continued to delay the 960.

Porsche the most profitable car company in the world. They own the 100K-200K cost bracket, and they make tons of money (much more than Ferrari, Mclaren or Lambo) doing what they've been doing in that cost bracket. They don't need to compete with Ferrari, Mclaren or lambo in the 200-350K bracket.

Porsche will produce a hypercar every decade or so, to show they can build something just as amazing as Ferrari or McLaren, but then go back to making their 911-based cars costing 100-200K, and continue as a company to make much more money than Ferrari or McLaren.

So true, but hey if they can bump it up a bit and still compete why not. Same as bumping down with the lowly Macao 4 cyl lol

I would love to see the 960 come to fruition. Even a two door panamera like coupe might catch my eye
Old 03-27-2017, 09:28 PM
  #584  
grendel88
Instructor
 
grendel88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 198
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Houndstooth
You can, and McLaren is making a big push so that customers know that you can enjoy a 570S everyday, just like you can enjoy a TTS, but just with a little more flair.
TTS is still a $200K car. Anybody who can afford a $200K car for a daily driver most likely has a fairly cushy daily drive.
Old 03-27-2017, 09:52 PM
  #585  
porscheflat6
Drifting
 
porscheflat6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: In my Garage
Posts: 2,413
Received 225 Likes on 147 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by grendel88
TTS is still a $200K car. Anybody who can afford a $200K car for a daily driver most likely has a fairly cushy daily drive.
Agree, most people tracking or daily driving cars above the $125K or more car can afford more car etc... I prefer car companies focused on performance and reliability so for me it is 1. Porsche, never see these broken down at track truly plug play right off show room and 2. Mclaren from what I see at the track and not being dismantled all the time. I will definitely buy a 570LT if they make it to go with my .2 GT3 so I have a little of each to thirsty my quench.


Quick Reply: McLaren Success



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:45 PM.