Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

How many 15-16 gt3's have engine replaced?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-01-2016, 04:22 AM
  #1786  
Apolo1
Pro
 
Apolo1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 620
Received 365 Likes on 142 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Macca
Mark. Firstly, commiserations!

Secondly, congratulations.

You have done very well to get this far IMO. One of the "leaders on the board". I do believe that a lack of track work has helped significantly with the lonegivity of your valve train along with regular oil changes and good warm up protocol. I also believe that there is some variance in when particular engine will trigger the "missfire code". Some, like my own, with very little wear to the finger follower pad, others like yourself after quite alot of wear and material has been removed from the face of the pad.

The reality of the situation is that there is nothing you could have done to avoid this. The good news is I believe at the very least you will receive the new heads with DLC cams and finger followers etc. It is possible you will receive an entirely new "G1" engine, the same architecture used in the lastest RS and 911R. Even better. Either way I would not be overly concerned, the filer is on the valve-train side and should have caught the majority of the debris one would hope. If you receive the new G1 engine maybe you will keep this car forever -0 it will be the only 8500++ screamer, if not then the choice is yours to enjoy and then sell when the warranty is up. Push hard and see if you can get the full engine, state your concerns with the material missing and possible effects to the bottom end etc.

I know this is not the time or place for it, but there is much talk the new 991.2 GT3 will adopt the 2017 911 GT3 Cup engine architecture and this will arrest the problem, along with the reduced redline for good. I do hope thats the case. People are pointing to oiling as the issue. But its clear there is more at play here than just throwing more lubricant at the mating surfaces between cam lobe and finger follower. Perhaps the recent DLC on DLC factory solution finally addresses this for good, and the timing of this update after the 9A1 motorsports engine was finalized and run in series 9jan 2016) would indicate to me this is a strong possibility. If not then I would suggest a total redisgn is in play with the current motorsports 9A1 engine and this will manifest itself as a production variant in the next 991.2 GT3. Only time will tell, if the DLC/DLC solution is the only significant change to the engines forthwith then rest assured your new heads/engine will serve you well for a long time. If the engine can be made 100% reliable I cant see what more one could want from a GT3 package such as the 991.1 GT3 (other than MT for those who do not track frequently).

Please keep up informed of progress. Travel well.
Hi M.
First of all very sorry to hear about the car above.....

M,
In view of this Topic, do you think regular oil changes help a lot. I ask due to the fact like you I had an Early 91GT3, Oct 13. It had done about 4k miles and 5 track days by the time it was called in for its new Engine in Feb 14. I kept this car until July 15. On both engines it did over 30 Track and V-max type events. Not once did it ever miss a beat. Like my Current 91RS, I change Oil and filter after every 3-4 Events....
Old 10-01-2016, 04:33 AM
  #1787  
CALSE
Racer
 
CALSE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: OC
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

About the same wear as yours Mark. Enjoy your loaner.
Old 10-01-2016, 05:53 AM
  #1788  
levd
Pro
 
levd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Europe
Posts: 605
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

It's OK, Mark.

Every single 991.1 GT3 will be there sooner or later. Your 2nd engine lasted more miles before rebuild than mine did.

I would not hope on getting a 3rd engine. Most like likely they'll give you a rebuild. That's what they do lately.
Old 10-01-2016, 12:57 PM
  #1789  
levd
Pro
 
levd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Europe
Posts: 605
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

One of my friends just got infamous "Engine control fault" message on his GT3.

MY15, F engine, 17500 km, some track usage (1500-2000 km on track, AFAIK).

Short summary:

There are 4 of 991 GT3 cars I'm well informed about where I live. Two MY14 (including my own) and two MY15 (there are 2 more, but I'm not keeping close enough contact with the owners to be sure about their cars issues. From what I know, one of them still has only delivery miles on the clock).

Out of these 4 cars, 1 MY14 and both MY15 are already affected by engine issue, all of them under 20.000 km.

4rd car is MY14 with 13.000 km that is for sale since last year. Owner doesn't drive it at all. I was actually thinking about getting this as a spare car for myself, when my car was in a long engine rebuild, but I believe this car will bring a nice and very fast delivered surprise to a new owner, so I refrained from picking it up.

So much about "just some cars are affected".
Old 10-01-2016, 05:35 PM
  #1790  
Loess
Three Wheelin'
 
Loess's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,301
Received 175 Likes on 95 Posts
Default

When I look at those pictures of the cam follower, it seems like the cam lobe is hitting the follower rather than following it. At very high rpm I wonder if the cam hits the follower and then the follower floats a bit before hitting again on the down side. It's sad to see that on an engine with 15000 miles.

I can't believe a Porsche engineer can't look at that wear and know exactly what the problem is.
Old 10-01-2016, 05:58 PM
  #1791  
Macca
Rennlist Member
 
Macca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 14,140
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Loess
When I look at those pictures of the cam follower, it seems like the cam lobe is hitting the follower rather than following it. At very high rpm I wonder if the cam hits the follower and then the follower floats a bit before hitting again on the down side. It's sad to see that on an engine with 15000 miles. I can't believe a Porsche engineer can't look at that wear and know exactly what the problem is.
Totally agree with you. It's not surely only a lubrication issue. It may be a metallurgy one (two different hardness compounds sticking each other repeatedly with force many millions of times) or one of the components physical design...
Old 10-01-2016, 06:18 PM
  #1792  
Jimmy-D
Race Director
 
Jimmy-D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Midwest
Posts: 11,281
Received 1,458 Likes on 761 Posts
Default

^The scary thing is they knew of these issues but continue to pump these cars out making updates as they go. I guess they figure cheaper then a recall and engine replacements for all. Actually, very reckless and disappointing on their part but it is all about risk/reward/cost
Old 10-01-2016, 07:31 PM
  #1793  
Macca
Rennlist Member
 
Macca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 14,140
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jimmy-D
^The scary thing is they knew of these issues but continue to pump these cars out making updates as they go. I guess they figure cheaper then a recall and engine replacements for all. Actually, very reckless and disappointing on their part but it is all about risk/reward/cost
Yes I agree but it seem to be the way of the future now. Look even the GT4, problems now with MT durability starting to increase, differentials made of chocolate, then we have the RS with rubbing under-body work on fast compression.

It is not possible to rust any product, even the new GT3 next year, until its had time to be proven. Its very easy to look back 20 years and say Mezger "good engine". Sure hindsight is nice but the road was rocky and by the end it was pretty sorted engine. At some point you need to get on with it and if you cant wait 10 years to find out if what you want is perfect then take the chance now and live with the adventure than may pursue.

Jimmy, if you are the worrying type I would not consider any 991.1 product including 911R or even 991.2 GT3 may not be fully resolved on launch or in its first 18 months production. Maybe one towards the end is better?

What Im getting at here is that I suspect the speed at which the market is moving with competitors vying for the same dollar, we will have to expect in the future to have more warranty concerns than in the recent past. Just go in eyes wide open and none of this will be an issue for you....
Old 10-01-2016, 09:38 PM
  #1794  
Jamie@dundonmotorsports
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Jamie@dundonmotorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Gig Harbor, Wa
Posts: 1,954
Received 370 Likes on 204 Posts
Default

We have heads ordered to finish up the last few bits on the long term solution to this, to those seeing the lifter being the culprit you're on the correct path. The issue has to do with the force that the lifter is pressing the finger follower against the cam lobe, and the lack of space left between the lobe and the follower for an oil film.

The hope was that the new DLC cams were of a different dimension to give a little more room in the system.

I'm also pursuing details on the new DFI cup engine to see what, if any, differences are in the Cup variant.
__________________
Dundon Motorsports
Gig Harbor, WA
253-200-4454
jamie@dundonmotorsports.com

www.dundonmotorsports.com
Facebook.com/dundonmotorsports
Instagram @dundon_motorsports
Old 10-01-2016, 10:00 PM
  #1795  
Macca
Rennlist Member
 
Macca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 14,140
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Thanks Jamie for the update. Exciting. Where the lobes in the DLC camshafts a different width? Or is this still unkown?

Last edited by Macca; 10-02-2016 at 01:27 AM.
Old 10-02-2016, 12:33 AM
  #1796  
Loess
Three Wheelin'
 
Loess's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,301
Received 175 Likes on 95 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jamie@dundonmotorsports
We have heads ordered to finish up the last few bits on the long term solution to this, to those seeing the lifter being the culprit you're on the correct path. The issue has to do with the force that the lifter is pressing the finger follower against the cam lobe, and the lack of space left between the lobe and the follower for an oil film.

The hope was that the new DLC cams were of a different dimension to give a little more room in the system.

I'm also pursuing details on the new DFI cup engine to see what, if any, differences are in the Cup variant.
Jamie, I agree it could be that there is too much pressure from the lifter so it increases wear but could it be that there is not enough pressure on the follower so at very high rpms a slight gap develops between the follower and the cam so when the lob comes around it impacts the follower (instead of gradually lifting it), bounces up and it drops back down? I see a big impact wear and a little wear when it comes back down if I'm looking at it right. Getting the pressure just right in the lifter would be tricky at 9000rpm with variable temperatures.
Old 10-02-2016, 07:24 AM
  #1797  
hf1
Rennlist Member
 
hf1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Northeast
Posts: 10,392
Likes: 0
Received 1,639 Likes on 1,122 Posts
Default

Maybe everyone should hsve just stuck with the rule to only put race proven engines in the GT cars. Meanwhile, it's a full on stripes and decals fiesta over in the R forum.
Old 10-02-2016, 07:36 AM
  #1798  
levd
Pro
 
levd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Europe
Posts: 605
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Most of Rs could have been shipped with no engine at all.
Old 10-02-2016, 08:09 AM
  #1799  
Macca
Rennlist Member
 
Macca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 14,140
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hf1
Maybe everyone should hsve just stuck with the rule to only put race proven engines in the GT cars. Meanwhile, it's a full on stripes and decals fiesta over in the R forum.
Yeah, but I doubt those cars will ever be properly driven, so its likely their owners will need to venture to this board in a few years time ;-P
Old 10-02-2016, 08:10 AM
  #1800  
Macca
Rennlist Member
 
Macca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 14,140
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by levd
Most of Rs could have been shipped with no engine at all.
Ha Ha. Great minds. I posted same time as you LOL!


Quick Reply: How many 15-16 gt3's have engine replaced?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:25 AM.