Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Orthojoe .2 GT3 Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-05-2018, 10:18 PM
  #226  
neurotic
Rennlist Member
 
neurotic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,411
Received 567 Likes on 269 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by drdonger
Do you have LEDS, front lift or Bose?
also, extended tank?
Old 06-06-2018, 12:22 AM
  #227  
gt-2
Advanced
 
gt-2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Jesus, Mary and Joseph these things are getting to be real heifers?! Please Porsche go to lotus for some consult services on weight savings
Old 06-06-2018, 01:00 AM
  #228  
orthojoe
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
orthojoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 7,804
Received 191 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mech33


Thanks for the informative post, Jeff. So I assume that since there is less total rotor mass and less total pad mass with your AP BBK vs your AP rotor kit for stock calipers, the rotors and pads will wear faster for the same use and need more frequent replacement?

Can you commwnt roughly on what relative service life you expect to see for a stock size pad and AP rotor can the AP BBK for pads and rotors for the same use (based on theory of the material volumes etc.)?

Thanks!
Pad wear rate is DEFINITELY much less with the AP setup than the OEM setup. I just look a look at the DS1.11 pads on my car after 2.5 track days and they barely look worn. On the OEM system the DS1.11 pads would last 6 days at the most. I'm pretty sure with the AP setup they will last at least double.
Old 06-06-2018, 01:08 AM
  #229  
Mech33
Nordschleife Master
 
Mech33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 5,365
Received 623 Likes on 381 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by orthojoe
Pad wear rate is DEFINITELY much less with the AP setup than the OEM setup. I just look a look at the DS1.11 pads on my car after 2.5 track days and they barely look worn. On the OEM system the DS1.11 pads would last 6 days at the most. I'm pretty sure with the AP setup they will last at least double.
Dis you measure thickness before and after? Not sure why wear would be significantly less.
Old 06-06-2018, 01:18 AM
  #230  
orthojoe
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
orthojoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 7,804
Received 191 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mech33
Dis you measure thickness before and after? Not sure why wear would be significantly less.
I didn't. Here is what the front looks like right now. Maybe it has something to do with less heat? Maybe it will wear faster as the pads get thinner? We'll find out eventually. Need you to start driving your car!!!!
Attached Images  
Old 06-06-2018, 02:16 AM
  #231  
A/S
Burning Brakes
 
A/S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: U.S.
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
Received 286 Likes on 131 Posts
Default

I had to remove caster from my 991.1 GT3 RS when I added shims to reach -3.5 camber (wanted to gain camber with shims instead of the strut tops).

The camber curves went poop. I had understeer despite the camber gains. So, I used a LongAcre camber gauge, and measured left front and right front tire camber at 45 degrees steering wheel turn, 90 degrees, 135 and 180 (a half steering turn), turning left and right. I took notes of the different camber readings and I was at nearly -6 degrees at half turn, this is nowhere ideal for a Hoosier as the tire would be riding on the inner edge (hence my understeer).

I dialed back to 9,3 caster (from 10.7) and found the sweet spot for front camber while turning the wheels.

The in-car videos helped me identify the different steering angles I needed while driving, to then calculate the caster that didn't send the camber curves to useless. Ideally you want a lot of caster, but you also want the camber on the outside front wheel to be on the preferred spot for the tires being used when turning, and each racetrack requires a different range of steering wheel angles when turning, so the alignment should be racetrack-specific
Old 06-06-2018, 04:10 AM
  #232  
Mech33
Nordschleife Master
 
Mech33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 5,365
Received 623 Likes on 381 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by orthojoe
I didn't. Here is what the front looks like right now. Maybe it has something to do with less heat? Maybe it will wear faster as the pads get thinner? We'll find out eventually. Need you to start driving your car!!!!
LOL tell me about it. Been stuck traveling too much.

BTW I think your AP pad spring block thing is backwards on the right side of your photo...
Old 06-06-2018, 04:33 AM
  #233  
Yargk
Rennlist Member
 
Yargk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,226
Received 230 Likes on 150 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by A/S
The in-car videos helped me identify the different steering angles I needed while driving, to then calculate the caster that didn't send the camber curves to useless. Ideally you want a lot of caster, but you also want the camber on the outside front wheel to be on the preferred spot for the tires being used when turning, and each racetrack requires a different range of steering wheel angles when turning, so the alignment should be racetrack-specific

I'd be very interested in hearing more about this. I wonder in very tight hairpins whether the camber gain from caster is so much as to reduce front end grip. I've heard some autocross people say as much and recommend smaller caster numbers for autox.
Old 06-06-2018, 09:51 AM
  #234  
SCCAForums
Pro
 
SCCAForums's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Typically at a race track near you!
Posts: 720
Received 79 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by neurotic
also, extended tank?
Originally Posted by drdonger
Do you have LEDS, front lift or Bose?
Originally Posted by gt-2
Please Porsche go to lotus for some consult services on weight savings
Neurotic & Drdonger - Car does have Extended Tank, Front Lift & Bose, and tank was Full. Car does not have LED's.

Gt-2, car weighs 3100 lbs empty.

Best Regards,
Dave
Old 06-06-2018, 04:15 PM
  #235  
orthojoe
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
orthojoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 7,804
Received 191 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mech33
LOL tell me about it. Been stuck traveling too much.

BTW I think your AP pad spring block thing is backwards on the right side of your photo...
You're right. Thanks! I didn't realize the blocks were directional
Old 06-06-2018, 05:36 PM
  #236  
A/S
Burning Brakes
 
A/S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: U.S.
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
Received 286 Likes on 131 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SCCAForums
Neurotic & Drdonger - Car does have Extended Tank, Front Lift & Bose, and tank was Full. Car does not have LED's.

Gt-2, car weighs 3100 lbs empty.

Best Regards,
Dave
The 991.2 GT3 got lighter than the 991.1 GT3. Your car is pretty light at 3,100 lbs with no fuel, considering it has A/C, Bose and Axle lift. The axle lift system was made lighter with the 991.2 (no more mega heavy pump like my 991.1 GT3 RS).

My 991.1 GT3 RS on 3 gallons of fuel is at 3,088 lbs, but it has the Ti center muffler (stock), the side mufflers deleted with single L-pipes (not valved), and a set of wheels 27 lbs lighter than stock.

The deletion of the unnecessary side mufflers takes 40 lbs from behind the rear axle, and if you do a Lithium battery to replace the stock brick you get another 35 lbs removed, and an used Ti center muffler is a further 8 lbs. Throw a 2nd set of forged wheels, remove a bunch of tools and the car would be in the 2,9xx lbs range before fuel. Most cars these days have to be made of carbon fiber to get below 3,000 lbs.
Old 06-06-2018, 05:44 PM
  #237  
hellboy_mcqueen
Pro
 
hellboy_mcqueen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Earth
Posts: 540
Received 34 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by A/S
The 991.2 GT3 got lighter than the 991.1 GT3. Your car is pretty light at 3,100 lbs with no fuel, considering it has A/C, Bose and Axle lift. The axle lift system was made lighter with the 991.2 (no more mega heavy pump like my 991.1 GT3 RS).

My 991.1 GT3 RS on 3 gallons of fuel is at 3,088 lbs, but it has the Ti center muffler (stock), the side mufflers deleted with single L-pipes (not valved), and a set of wheels 27 lbs lighter than stock
Not really. 991.2 GT3 still has the old pneumatic system, whereas GT3 RS and GT2 RS has hydraulic system which weighs half
Old 06-06-2018, 05:50 PM
  #238  
A/S
Burning Brakes
 
A/S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: U.S.
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
Received 286 Likes on 131 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FelisMalicious


Not really. 991.2 GT3 still has the old pneumatic system, whereas GT3 RS and GT2 RS has hydraulic system which weighs half
wow!! that's going to make the 991.2 GT3 RS even lighter. I'm awaiting for my allocation, and I'm adding axle lift again, makes loading on my trailer a peaceful process.
Old 06-06-2018, 08:57 PM
  #239  
SCCAForums
Pro
 
SCCAForums's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Typically at a race track near you!
Posts: 720
Received 79 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by A/S
wow!! that's going to make the 991.2 GT3 RS even lighter. I'm awaiting for my allocation, and I'm adding axle lift again, makes loading on my trailer a peaceful process.
I ordered my .2 GT3 RS with FAL as well, I love it, for me it's a must have... just for the convenience of loading unloading, or going up and down driveways.

I plan to do the Lithium battery and side muffler delete on the RS (my .2 GT3 is all stock). And believe on empty the car will be very close to 3,000 lbs on OEM wheels/tires.

Best Regards,
Dave
Old 06-06-2018, 11:08 PM
  #240  
oldskews4
Rennlist Member
 
oldskews4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

When are you gonna make it out to one of my events? I want to see orthojoe in action!

You will never run into traffic problems. No sessions, 7+ hours of track time..


Quick Reply: Orthojoe .2 GT3 Thread



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:44 PM.