991.2 GT3 RS Mule
#61
Rennlist Member
If we can't believe the head of GT development who should we believe? Remember he NEVER said that there would not be a MT GT3. He did express his thinking regarding the benefits of PDK-S over MT.
Whatever, I hope he gives those that want a MT in the RS that option. I remain dubious he will but hope I am wrong.
Whatever, I hope he gives those that want a MT in the RS that option. I remain dubious he will but hope I am wrong.
#62
Rennlist Member
#63
Race Car
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: The way to hell is paved by good intentions “Wenn ich Purist höre...entsichere ich meinen Browning” "Myths are fuel for marketing (and nowadays for flippers too,,,)" time to time is not sufficient to be a saint, you must be also an Hero
Posts: 4,446
Received 422 Likes
on
250 Posts
AP was a jurnos and he s indeed the PAG press p.r. man
but the 100hours mainrance interval of this new engine
Vs the 50hours of the past one is a fact
but the 100hours mainrance interval of this new engine
Vs the 50hours of the past one is a fact
#64
GT3RS!!
I didn't think they would try to stay NA lagging (Or no lag?) behind competitors with 600HP sedans now not being exceptional and the gigantic step to the GT2.
You know what the best GT3 is? The next one....
Is it me or the front fenders are a bit wider?
Maybe the nose is from a GT3, the whole combo looks ugly with the new nose with wider fenders, looks a bit undercooked, with that high splitter and pointy nose..
I guess they will just roll the fenders a bit more.
I wonder what the openings in the hood could possible be fore, anyone any idea's?
4.2L would make a big difference, the rest is just fine tuning, diffuser, splitter, tires, RWS, PDK etc I would think.
AP, I did shut up and drive!
Hurry up, I only have 30K warranties miles left....
I didn't think they would try to stay NA lagging (Or no lag?) behind competitors with 600HP sedans now not being exceptional and the gigantic step to the GT2.
You know what the best GT3 is? The next one....
Is it me or the front fenders are a bit wider?
Maybe the nose is from a GT3, the whole combo looks ugly with the new nose with wider fenders, looks a bit undercooked, with that high splitter and pointy nose..
I guess they will just roll the fenders a bit more.
I wonder what the openings in the hood could possible be fore, anyone any idea's?
4.2L would make a big difference, the rest is just fine tuning, diffuser, splitter, tires, RWS, PDK etc I would think.
AP, I did shut up and drive!
Hurry up, I only have 30K warranties miles left....
front hood is different from .1RS, looks like there are two ribs aside the central lowered band, maybe there are not holes but the ribs simply diverge outwards...could be aimed to deviate flows towards the holes in the mirrors and then to the side inlets?
#65
Rennlist Member
No sunroof, some ram air HP, wider body bigger wing otherwise identical.
997.2 GT3 VS 997.2RS some ram air, wider body, bigger wing LWFW, otherwise the same.
991.1 GT3 VS RS 200CC! some ram air, wider body, bigger wing carbon more CF parts. This was the biggest difference so far, it may continue but not so sure.
#66
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
#67
Rennlist Member
I don't see a 4.2 happening...wouldn't they have run a 4.2 in the cup cars first?? Cups are 4 liters now
#72
The same guy who says that the extra 400 RPM in the .2GT3 is "no big deal" and would rather have a less advanced engine at lower RPM and lower horsepower.
#73
Rennlist Member
#74
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Here is a thread with some big displacement stuff:
https://rennlist.com/forums/997-gt2-...announced.html
#75
the RSR of the time was running a 4.0 engine? there is no motorsport car with a 4.2 now, I'd have thought a 4.2 in the road car would be somewhat less likely unless there was a convenient part that could be raided from the parts bin to make the extra capacity (petevb had spotted it previously for the 991rs to go to a 4.0 iirc).