Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

my 3L dyno

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-11-2015, 08:47 AM
  #46  
reno808
Rennlist Member
 
reno808's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: In the garage trying to keep boost down
Posts: 8,809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You need a bigger t-body. Looks a like bottle neck. Is that reg anti-freeze? I would also upgrade the oil cooler as well.
Old 12-11-2015, 08:48 AM
  #47  
JBrown
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
JBrown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NY
Posts: 1,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by reno808
You need a bigger t-body. Looks a like bottle neck. Is that reg anti-freeze? I would also upgrade the oil cooler as well.
What ever anti freeze he put in it !! And I was told stock TB out flows the head all day it's still only an 8v.. And yes that is my plan add an oil cooler or a bigger one !
Old 12-11-2015, 08:58 AM
  #48  
reno808
Rennlist Member
 
reno808's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: In the garage trying to keep boost down
Posts: 8,809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JBrown
What ever anti freeze he put in it !! And I was told stock TB out flows the head all day it's still only an 8v.. And yes that is my plan add an oil cooler or a bigger one !
Is the head stock?
Old 12-11-2015, 09:05 AM
  #49  
JBrown
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
JBrown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NY
Posts: 1,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by reno808
Is the head stock?
No has Alberts cam.. Also ported and bigger intake valves 49mm
Old 12-11-2015, 10:03 AM
  #50  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,498
Received 633 Likes on 490 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JBrown
That is correct
Shawn (refresh951) got a pretty significant gain by swapping up to a Ford 4.6L TB, which is 65mm vs stock 55.

look how much the curve smoothed up with the larger tb..


Old 12-11-2015, 10:05 AM
  #51  
JBrown
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
JBrown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NY
Posts: 1,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by V2Rocket_aka944
Shawn (refresh951) got a pretty significant gain by swapping up to a Ford 4.6L TB, which is 65mm vs stock 55.

look how much the curve smoothed up with the larger tb..


Yes very nice curve ! I will have the car next week and I will show I my ignition maps and such also like I said will do the meth kit. And some other mods ! This motor should breath fire !!
Old 12-11-2015, 10:17 AM
  #52  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,498
Received 633 Likes on 490 Posts
Default

Also, I think that dyno with the Mustang TB was on the stock intake manifold too.
Old 12-11-2015, 11:55 AM
  #53  
Auto_Werks 3.6
Quit Smokin'
Rennlist Member
 
Auto_Werks 3.6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 2,752
Received 284 Likes on 184 Posts
Default

hahahahahaha you and albert deserve each other.

How did you not at least discuss the target output BEFORE agreeing to deal?

And I believe a standard day is 15'C or 59'F... so that is possibly hurting your pull in FL
Old 12-11-2015, 11:59 AM
  #54  
JBrown
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
JBrown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NY
Posts: 1,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Auto_Werks 3.6
hahahahahaha you and albert deserve each other.

How did you not at least discuss the target output BEFORE agreeing to deal?

And I believe a standard day is 15'C or 59'F... so that is possibly hurting your pull in FL
He told me 450 easy shy of 500 wheel if he told me I would only get 400 I would of never did it


I spent very pretty penny on this motor and it should perform !
Old 12-11-2015, 12:12 PM
  #55  
docwyte
Rennlist Member
 
docwyte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: denver, co
Posts: 7,391
Received 488 Likes on 325 Posts
Default

Oh god. Please stop with all the arm chair quarterbacking. Devon, do you want to *drive* this car or do you want to just continually spend money on it trying to fix what's "wrong"?

There's nothing (!!) "wrong" with the performance. It's just a NUMBER on a piece of paper! Get the car home. DRIVE IT AS IS FOR A LONG TIME, then, if you're still somehow unhappy with the performance, spend more money on it.

Honestly you're falling into a very deep hole here. DO NOT FOLLOW THE RABBIT DOWN THE HOLE!
Old 12-11-2015, 12:38 PM
  #56  
JBrown
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
JBrown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NY
Posts: 1,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by docwyte
Oh god. Please stop with all the arm chair quarterbacking. Devon, do you want to *drive* this car or do you want to just continually spend money on it trying to fix what's "wrong"?

There's nothing (!!) "wrong" with the performance. It's just a NUMBER on a piece of paper! Get the car home. DRIVE IT AS IS FOR A LONG TIME, then, if you're still somehow unhappy with the performance, spend more money on it.

Honestly you're falling into a very deep hole here. DO NOT FOLLOW THE RABBIT DOWN THE HOLE!
I have every right to be disappointed with the power out put of this motor when some one says it will be a 500whp or just shy of it and I nearly brake 400...

And yes a number is just a number your 100 percent right
Old 12-11-2015, 12:44 PM
  #57  
wwhalenc
5th Gear
 
wwhalenc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: 80301
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I agree. He was sold one setup and received something different. At this level of investment I think he has the right to disgruntled. Tuners should strive to make it better on their dime.
Old 12-11-2015, 12:47 PM
  #58  
jmj951
Pro
 
jmj951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: This changes a lot.
Posts: 726
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

A number is just a number when you're just curious what it does, but the more money involved, the more important that number is. Numbers are everything when justifying the sale price of a car or the cost of performance improvement. I don't think we should be downplaying the significance of the number.

I don't know exactly how the planning conversations for this build went, but based on what the OP wrote it probably had a lot to do with a peak number, specifically with beating 450rwhp, which is probably why that crazy intake was included.
Old 12-11-2015, 12:48 PM
  #59  
JBrown
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
JBrown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NY
Posts: 1,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by wwhalenc
I agree. He was sold one setup and received something different. At this level of investment I think he has the right to disgruntled. Tuners should strive to make it better on their dime.
Even if it fell short of the goal thats no big deal but just about 100hp short ?
Old 12-11-2015, 01:06 PM
  #60  
pole position
Burning Brakes
 
pole position's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Official Jack off extinguisher
Posts: 1,173
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

So much fail in this thread from dyno racers,let me ask you how many races have you won on the dyno?
Second,you ain't making 500 real world whp on pump, ever, unless you are running E85 or 110 you are going to be sh*t out of luck


Quick Reply: my 3L dyno



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:06 PM.