Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

My porsche 944 S2 16 valve turbo project

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-21-2014, 10:23 AM
  #211  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,570
Received 654 Likes on 508 Posts
Default

how will the push-clutch work with the standard bellhousing?
Old 03-21-2014, 03:27 PM
  #212  
turbotim3
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
turbotim3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Bourne, Lincs. UK
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chris White
That looks like a lot of machining! should have taken a pic of the large chuck of metal before it was machined.
Was that really made from one large piece of steel? I don't see any join lines or fasteners....

Hi Chris, Yes it was CNC Machined, from a single piece of Forged Chrome Molly Steel. Its looking good with the AP clutch fitted. We have got to make some small alterations to the bell housing but should be worth it for the driveability. The centre push slave cylinder is going to be tight but we are getting there. Should be dummy built in the next few days, I'll let you know how it goes.
Old 03-21-2014, 03:31 PM
  #213  
turbotim3
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
turbotim3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Bourne, Lincs. UK
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by V2Rocket_aka944
how will the push-clutch work with the standard bellhousing?
The centre push slave cylinder mounts in the back of the bell housing and the input shaft goes through the centre of it.
Old 03-21-2014, 03:34 PM
  #214  
blade7
Drifting
 
blade7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: England UK
Posts: 2,256
Received 33 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by turbotim3
Hi, I know the Porsche 16 valve lifter is the same size as a cosworth one, but I have no idea about the 8 valve as I have not seen one. Cheers Tim
I have a set of Sierra Cosworth and 2.7 lifters in the garage, I'll compare them.
Old 03-21-2014, 03:36 PM
  #215  
blade7
Drifting
 
blade7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: England UK
Posts: 2,256
Received 33 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by turbotim3
Hi Chris, Yes it was CNC Machined, from a single piece of Forged Chrome Molly Steel. Its looking good with the AP clutch fitted. We have got to make some small alterations to the bell housing but should be worth it for the driveability. The centre push slave cylinder is going to be tight but we are getting there. Should be dummy built in the next few days, I'll let you know how it goes.
Are you building it for your Grandson .
Old 03-21-2014, 03:52 PM
  #216  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,570
Received 654 Likes on 508 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by turbotim3
The centre push slave cylinder mounts in the back of the bell housing and the input shaft goes through the centre of it.
Is this setup something that could be perhaps duplicated with the standard 944/951 pressure plate/flywheel?
Old 03-21-2014, 04:18 PM
  #217  
turbotim3
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
turbotim3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Bourne, Lincs. UK
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by V2Rocket_aka944
Is this setup something that could be perhaps duplicated with the standard 944/951 pressure plate/flywheel?

No, I'm afraid not. The standard setup is a pull clutch
Old 03-21-2014, 05:41 PM
  #218  
turbotim3
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
turbotim3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Bourne, Lincs. UK
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by blade7
Are you building it for your Grandson .
Yes your right Paul, it is taking sometime, but I can see the light at the end of the tunnel. How's your build coming along by the way.
Old 03-21-2014, 06:29 PM
  #219  
blade7
Drifting
 
blade7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: England UK
Posts: 2,256
Received 33 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by turbotim3
Yes your right Paul, it is taking sometime, but I can see the light at the end of the tunnel. How's your build coming along by the way.
I haven't bought the pistons yet. Summer is coming and I'd rather ride my new bike.

Last edited by blade7; 03-22-2014 at 01:48 PM.
Old 04-11-2014, 08:51 PM
  #220  
ptuomov
Nordschleife Master
 
ptuomov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,610
Received 81 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by turbotim3
Right guys, I have finally finished the revised engine build. Has you know I had a little trouble with number one big end bearing, maybe it from revving it to 8000 rpm, oil temp to high or possibly to tight a tolerance. Anyway I had to decide what I was trying to achieve, the car is mainly going to be used on the road with standard gearbox etc. so I did not really need 700 plus horsepower and huge torque. So having read various threads and comments I decide to go a different route. I have turned the engine back to three litre, I've taken the compression ratio up to nine to one and have mapped the engine using the Garrett stage five turbo(T350 exhaust wheel, 61 inducer and .82 exhaust housing). This setup as worked really well I think, especially for road use. It should come on boost well and have loads of usable torque. Below is a dyno sheet and plot for your inspection. The last two recorded pulls have different temp and bara readings because the wastegate pipe broke and we finished it the following night.



Congratulations for a fantastic road motor you've built here.

Here's a question: How did you get the naturally aspirated torque curve to be that flat? The motor seems to be making between 12 and 13 ft-lbs per psi of absolute pressure in the entire 2500-7000 rev range. Without a turbo, that would be something like 175-195 ft-lbs for the entire 2500-7000 rpm range. That's remarkable. In my turbo project (it's 928 S4), when I want the torque curve to be flat, I need to vary the boost all over the place to compensate for the variation in the naturally aspirated torque curve.
Old 04-12-2014, 10:59 AM
  #221  
Dougs951
Rennlist Member
 
Dougs951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Southern MD
Posts: 3,792
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ptuomov
Congratulations for a fantastic road motor you've built here.

Here's a question: How did you get the naturally aspirated torque curve to be that flat? The motor seems to be making between 12 and 13 ft-lbs per psi of absolute pressure in the entire 2500-7000 rev range. Without a turbo, that would be something like 175-195 ft-lbs for the entire 2500-7000 rpm range. That's remarkable. In my turbo project (it's 928 S4), when I want the torque curve to be flat, I need to vary the boost all over the place to compensate for the variation in the naturally aspirated torque curve.
Thats the beauty of the 3L, even in stock form they have a flat torque curve.
Old 04-12-2014, 12:27 PM
  #222  
ptuomov
Nordschleife Master
 
ptuomov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,610
Received 81 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ptuomov
Congratulations for a fantastic road motor you've built here.

Here's a question: How did you get the naturally aspirated torque curve to be that flat? The motor seems to be making between 12 and 13 ft-lbs per psi of absolute pressure in the entire 2500-7000 rev range. Without a turbo, that would be something like 175-195 ft-lbs for the entire 2500-7000 rpm range. That's remarkable. In my turbo project (it's 928 S4), when I want the torque curve to be flat, I need to vary the boost all over the place to compensate for the variation in the naturally aspirated torque curve.
Originally Posted by Dougs951
Thats the beauty of the 3L, even in stock form they have a flat torque curve.
I think that this torque curve is a lot flatter than that of the stock 16V 3L:

rpm, TT3 torque, TT3 boost psi, Torque per abs psi, TT3 torque rescaled to ambient, Stock 16v 3L torque
2550 250 6 12.1 178 195
2740 421 19 12.5 184 197
3050 501 25 12.6 186 200
3510 507 26 12.5 183 206
4020 509 26 12.5 184 207
4530 510 26 12.5 184 206
5070 514 25 12.9 190 205
5520 518 25 13.0 192 198
6030 502 24 13.0 191 182
6500 495 23 13.1 193 160
7050 451 22 12.3 181 130

How was this done? Is it that the intake manifold was designed to do that with the shorter runners? Or is the intake manifold tuned to give the two Helmholtz peaks at 3000 and 6500 rpm and then the camshaft fills in the hole in between? Would like to know, just to learn.
Old 04-12-2014, 01:16 PM
  #223  
refresh951
Rennlist Member
 
refresh951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Marietta, Georgia
Posts: 3,365
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

He also is running a short runner intake.
Old 04-12-2014, 01:32 PM
  #224  
Thom
Race Car
 
Thom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,329
Received 41 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ptuomov
In my turbo project (it's 928 S4), when I want the torque curve to be flat, I need to vary the boost all over the place to compensate for the variation in the naturally aspirated torque curve.
Are your cams stock S4 cams and how did you time them?
Old 04-12-2014, 01:39 PM
  #225  
ptuomov
Nordschleife Master
 
ptuomov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,610
Received 81 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Thom
Are your cams stock S4 cams and how did you time them?
Right now they are stock S4 cams timed as they came from the factory. They fall on their faces after 5000 or so rpm so a lot of what I am compensating for at high rpms is the small cams. I get that. I know that I can "rotate" the torque curve a bit with bigger cams.

Still, even with the variable geometry (stock) intake manifold I will not be anywhere as flat as TurboTim's torque curve. That torque curve is the flattest I've ever seen from 2500-7000 rpm.


Quick Reply: My porsche 944 S2 16 valve turbo project



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:22 PM.