CPRacing: V3 Splitter/PICS....
#243
Rennlist Member
Actually later in the day when we got the car handling better I was touching 240kmh / 150mph indicated.
I'm still wondering on the concept of having some freedom of movement upwards to allow for riding kerbs etc? Either a cable or even some sort of support that has a spring inside it sort of like a little shock absorber? Am I off base here?
I'm still wondering on the concept of having some freedom of movement upwards to allow for riding kerbs etc? Either a cable or even some sort of support that has a spring inside it sort of like a little shock absorber? Am I off base here?
#245
Race Director
Thread Starter
Actually later in the day when we got the car handling better I was touching 240kmh / 150mph indicated.
I'm still wondering on the concept of having some freedom of movement upwards to allow for riding kerbs etc? Either a cable or even some sort of support that has a spring inside it sort of like a little shock absorber? Am I off base here?
I'm still wondering on the concept of having some freedom of movement upwards to allow for riding kerbs etc? Either a cable or even some sort of support that has a spring inside it sort of like a little shock absorber? Am I off base here?
edit...too old, too tired...I meant negative horizontal. Are you trying to limit the negative horizontal travel while allowing a limited positive travel?
#246
Rennlist Member
Howdy mate. No what I'm thinking is that there is very little movement allowed up or down by using the fasteners supplied. Essentially you have the flex in the splitter material itself. On the track yesterday we don't ride the kerbs much so it didn't matter but on Sunday I'm at a track (Oran Park) where we ride completely over some kerbs normally and I just wondered if there was no upward movement allowed that we may risk cracking or dislodging something. My nose/bumper panel is stock which I imagine is injection molded plastic. Tony's is f/g and therefore possibly more brittle. I'm really just thinking out loud to the group to see various opinions or experiences. If the splitter can move upwards freely when riding an object that's fine. Equally so we can limit it's downward movement with a cable or something similar? Just an idea.
I think I'll leave the proposed side supports off for this Sunday in line with this thinking.
I think I'll leave the proposed side supports off for this Sunday in line with this thinking.
#247
Rennlist Member
#248
Three Wheelin'
#249
Rennlist Member
Not sure on the actual temp of the surface of the track. The general temp was up to 90f so pretty hot.
#250
Three Wheelin'
Howdy mate. No what I'm thinking is that there is very little movement allowed up or down by using the fasteners supplied. Essentially you have the flex in the splitter material itself. On the track yesterday we don't ride the kerbs much so it didn't matter but on Sunday I'm at a track (Oran Park) where we ride completely over some kerbs normally and I just wondered if there was no upward movement allowed that we may risk cracking or dislodging something. My nose/bumper panel is stock which I imagine is injection molded plastic. Tony's is f/g and therefore possibly more brittle. I'm really just thinking out loud to the group to see various opinions or experiences. If the splitter can move upwards freely when riding an object that's fine. Equally so we can limit it's downward movement with a cable or something similar? Just an idea.
I think I'll leave the proposed side supports off for this Sunday in line with this thinking.
I think I'll leave the proposed side supports off for this Sunday in line with this thinking.
#251
Three Wheelin'
A negative horizontal travel? Which way is that? A limited positive travel? I think you should have stuck with negative vertical travel
#252
Besides, I got the plow for free and I use it only very little, so I didn't pay so much attention on the looks. But it works and I've made several similar plow-mods for my atv-friends.
Traction in snow, well, that kinda depends how much there is snow. In 0,5meters on the ice topspeed is just above 50km/h but it goes forward nicely. In the woods it just goes forward. If not driven then with a winch.
#253
Rennlist Member
#254
Race Director
Thread Starter
downward of this plane would be negative, upward would be positve at least from a degree standpoint. Loading measures are the inverse.
#255
Rennlist Junkie Forever
What needs to happen is that there needs to be the front 1" wide steel strip along the bottom front of the splitter. This should be there so that if it drags, it hits the steel and not the plastic, but more importantly it needs to be there to give the splitter some rigidity at speed.
It's clear from the picture at speed that the splitter is flexing quite a bit. The steel lip would allow its shape to stay more uniform and consistent. Additionally the steel strip would provide a good set of mounting points for the vertical support rods.
TonyG
It's clear from the picture at speed that the splitter is flexing quite a bit. The steel lip would allow its shape to stay more uniform and consistent. Additionally the steel strip would provide a good set of mounting points for the vertical support rods.
TonyG