Rennlist Top 10 HP/TQ
04-15-2006, 12:50 PM
#588
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Frederick , MD
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1st car has a Lindsey Super65 , SFR stage 2 headers , JME cam ,New guides and 5 angle valve job by me ,Cometic MLS head gasket , LR 3in down pipe ,LR 3in Ex ,72lb inj , Spec stage 3 clutch ,super mounts ,Tial 38 ,MBC ,LR stage 2 intercooler, Lindsey stage 2 maf , mafterburner, chips ,zt2 ,.Im hoping for a little over 400 with this
2nd car is being built from robs old car
Erik
2nd car is being built from robs old car
Erik
05-05-2007, 03:53 AM
#592
Race Director
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by Tom M'Guinn
Who is the moderator for this list these days? Is there one?
05-05-2007, 04:30 AM
#593
Rennlist Member
Damn there's some funny stuff in these pages! Some very good reading too. Pity some of those guys don't post anymore. Ah well everything must change eventually.
05-05-2007, 05:29 AM
#595
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Originally Posted by Tom M'Guinn
Who is the moderator for this list these days? Is there one?
I'll take this over a street racing story in a heart beteat, as much as I like Joe.!
When Andrew does a test, it's an attempt @ science. When some other's do, it is because their ttrained monkey couldn't figure out BUBBA"S GENUINE MAAAAAF!; to go with it that was a KNOWN total guess by the third hand supplier; to match the misinformed goals of the original user. Confused?
Well you damned sure well should be, because that is how any QUALITY vendor of software, around here, should.
Anyway, Andrew test's his stuff. He gives data. He NEVER suffers fools; and his reintroduction, in my opinion, is great for this board.
Perhaps we will begin to lose those who think AMSOIL is DA BOMB 'cause their tech monkey said so...cause their tech GURU ????said so.....
I'm a big fan of having a NO B.S. Sheep Banger! back on this board!
You may not like what NZ says, but I challenge you to test and dispute it. He WILL...
No offense to you Tom. I have depest respect for you sir; but this board has suffered for the loss of Andrew's technical challenges.
YMMV.
E
05-05-2007, 05:34 AM
#596
Race Director
Thread Starter
I prefer Sheep Lover to Banger... they have feelings to you know 
I almost want to get another 951 to get up this ladder again! haha hmmmmmm *browses ads on suction site*
One thing for sure is I would approach the build very differently.
I almost want to get another 951 to get up this ladder again! haha hmmmmmm *browses ads on suction site*
One thing for sure is I would approach the build very differently.
05-05-2007, 06:10 AM
#597
Rennlist Member
Originally Posted by NZ951
I prefer Sheep Lover to Banger... they have feelings to you know
I almost want to get another 951 to get up this ladder again! haha hmmmmmm *browses ads on suction site*
One thing for sure is I would approach the build very differently.
I almost want to get another 951 to get up this ladder again! haha hmmmmmm *browses ads on suction site*
One thing for sure is I would approach the build very differently.
05-05-2007, 06:18 AM
#598
Race Director
Thread Starter
Well, its no big secret or anything new, just different from how I did it... I did too many bolt ons to increase VE, not enough on the head, only angle cutting valves and a mild port job. If I was to do it again I think I could get very good results off major head work with bigger valves and a bigger plenum volume with much shorter runners and a garrett GT series turbo (probably GT35 something), run mid 20's boost (obviously given right ECU and IC etc), and will have a motor that will make 400WHP+ all day long for really not a massive amount of money.
The inconvience of a new intake manifold and consequently restricting bigger turbos was too great at the time since I would only make one myself or rather design it and make it with mates etc. That and the "hassle" of head work meant not a lot got done. Well, I know better now
The inconvience of a new intake manifold and consequently restricting bigger turbos was too great at the time since I would only make one myself or rather design it and make it with mates etc. That and the "hassle" of head work meant not a lot got done. Well, I know better now
05-05-2007, 06:26 AM
#599
Rennlist Member
Originally Posted by NZ951
Well, its no big secret or anything new, just different from how I did it... I did too many bolt ons to increase VE, not enough on the head, only angle cutting valves and a mild port job. If I was to do it again I think I could get very good results off major head work with bigger valves and a bigger plenum volume with much shorter runners and a garrett GT series turbo (probably GT35 something), run mid 20's boost (obviously given right ECU and IC etc), and will have a motor that will make 400WHP+ all day long for really not a massive amount of money.
The inconvience of a new intake manifold and consequently restricting bigger turbos was too great at the time since I would only make one myself or rather design it and make it with mates etc. That and the "hassle" of head work meant not a lot got done. Well, I know better now
The inconvience of a new intake manifold and consequently restricting bigger turbos was too great at the time since I would only make one myself or rather design it and make it with mates etc. That and the "hassle" of head work meant not a lot got done. Well, I know better now
Do it again! Properly........
05-05-2007, 06:39 AM
#600
Race Director
Thread Starter
Yeah I am tempted to do a 968 turbo 16v actually. The 16v head is hard to compete with. Such a good base to start from, already 3.0, twin cam, 16v... Another option would be a 928 V8 motor in it with a couple of turbos... hmmmmm i dunno! I like the idea of a 924 GT replica track car too... argh!