Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Gain 100HP with an intake manifold change?? - Cross post from Ferrari Chat

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-17-2016, 04:47 PM
  #226  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,946
Received 141 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Strosek Ultra
Here you go, short and long, for use outside California.
Åke
928 engine art work! drooling!!!!
Old 03-17-2016, 04:56 PM
  #227  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,946
Received 141 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by soontobered84
I don't normally agree with Imre, but I agree with him in this instance:
[SIZ]Put your money where your mouth is.[/SIZE]

Commission an intake to the specs YOU want. Put your money on the line for a change. Glen has given you a great lead on a engineering/prototype/designer/fabricator. Greg Brown cannot and will never be bullied/cajoled/sweet-talked into ever providing products to fuel your ego, so get over it and go elsewhere.

Fund your own 100 HP intake and laugh all the way to a 1st place at the finish line or whatever your goal is.

[SIZ"]Just Do It[/SIZE]
I want someone to make it first, and thought by now, someone would have. Greg brown and his eqo will build something nice, but im sure its going to be $10k the Threshe intake is what im thinking , but i dont think any exist any longer, plus i want more plug and play.
thats why im DISCUSSING the possiblity of merging carls technology to what is already available. Glen's link is encuraging! that shows some pretty cool intake plennums.
I could care less about Greg Brown and his nonsense.

you talk about goals in the 928? what do you think they might be for anyone in the racing community? its a cheater car in most cases, and now that POC , PCA have HP to weight classes, you really dont even need all the HP that you once needed to be competitive. better in SCCA or NASA where at least you are competing against cars in the same weight class.

the only competition im in right now, is showing the 928 can survive racing in its near stock form. (now, sans the new bottom end)
My racing competition is a blast and its fine the way it is.. lots of people to race and be competitive with. however it would be nice to get to the HP levels of the competitors i used to dice with, that have since bolted on 50 to 100 more HP, and thats where the intake comes in. If i can find something near plug and play, ill buy it and bolt it in.
oh, and dont agree with Imor or whatever his call sign is..he is just a blow hard
Old 03-17-2016, 05:21 PM
  #228  
Mongo
Official Bay Area Patriot
Fuse 24 Assassin
Rennlist Member
 
Mongo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 31,653
Received 116 Likes on 61 Posts
Default

Perhaps maybe work with Carl on developing an S4+ intake????
Old 03-17-2016, 06:28 PM
  #229  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,946
Received 141 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mongo
Perhaps maybe work with Carl on developing an S4+ intake????
probably the best bet.. he is a great fabricator. i think the idea is sound im sure he can figure it out. Im betting it can work. its not like something like this has not been done before. seriously, i think the 928 is the only car that doesnt have an aftermarket intake available for it.
Old 03-17-2016, 06:51 PM
  #230  
Mongo
Official Bay Area Patriot
Fuse 24 Assassin
Rennlist Member
 
Mongo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 31,653
Received 116 Likes on 61 Posts
Default

The 944 does not nor does the 968, or any 996, 997 and 991.
Old 03-17-2016, 07:01 PM
  #231  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,946
Received 141 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

http://www.mustangandfords.com/featu...return-of-5-0/

Just look at what the mustang BOSS did to the power with an intake and slightly bigger valves and some head work. still a tame production car, that passes smog obviously, but the point is. they changed the long runner intake tube for this Aston Martin V8 style intake plennum and are pushing 450hp flywheel in stock form.
they can easily get this to the rear wheels with some minor tweaks.

Now, this is a 5 liter same as the 928 S4.. cams are a little more radical , with 12mm lift vs even the GT 10mm. but again, this is a stock engine. its rated at the flywheel 100 hp more than the GT. i dont know what the cam makes, because its a simlar cam to the coyote engine cam and both have 11:1 compression. the biggest change is head work and this new intake. valve size is 37mm intake. and bore and stroke is like a stroker crank 92mm, but a small bore diameter, 92mm. close to the v8 vantage demensions. it looks like our 100mm bore has advantages in that it uses a much shorter stroke.

encouraging to see that so much can be made from an intake
Attached Images   
Old 03-17-2016, 07:08 PM
  #232  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,946
Received 141 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mongo
The 944 does not nor does the 968, or any 996, 997 and 991.
thats obvious, right? no one cares about the little power of the 944na, because thats the turbo domintated world. (there is no stock turbo 928), and the 911s? they were designed right. with near 500hp coming out of the N/A 3.8 liter with small tweaks! I think the intake is better on the racing version of the intake and TBs
Old 03-17-2016, 08:54 PM
  #233  
Ducman82
 
Ducman82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Marysville WA
Posts: 6,981
Received 18 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

to many differences between the two motors to even compare them. again, apples and oranges.

intakes make power, that is not being disputed.

Time and money (lots of) is all that is needed to design and produce a different intake for our cars.
Old 03-17-2016, 09:05 PM
  #234  
Wisconsin Joe
Nordschleife Master
 
Wisconsin Joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Kaukauna Wisconsin
Posts: 5,925
Received 302 Likes on 231 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ducman82
to many differences between the two motors to even compare them. again, apples and oranges.

intakes make power, that is not being disputed.

Time and money (lots of) is all that is needed to design and produce a different intake for our cars.
One of the biggest differences is market size. They sold twice as many Mustangs last year than 928s total (really - 60k vs 120k).

Nobody is going to put the money (and you are absolutely right that developing an intake will take a lot of it) into something that won't sell enough of to recoup the cost.

Look at the guys on here who try to make stuff. Someone comes up with a plan. Lots of people say "Oooohhh. I want one." And a handful sell.

Greg is developing an "elbow macaroni" intake, kinda like on the Cayenne. I'd be curious to know how much time (man hours) he has in it. Fabricating, testing, refining & more fabrication, testing (repeat almost endlessly).
Old 03-17-2016, 09:12 PM
  #235  
Ducman82
 
Ducman82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Marysville WA
Posts: 6,981
Received 18 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

i was talking to him about it last week at his shop. its crazy how much work he puts in to it WHEN he has the free time to do that, when he is not working keeping the light on etc.

its going to be a very nice set up. makes me want a later motor..... then again, i might just have to convince him to help up 16v guys out. :-P
Old 03-17-2016, 09:30 PM
  #236  
GregBBRD
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
 
GregBBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 15,219
Received 2,451 Likes on 1,459 Posts
Default

This thread has been ruined. However, before it gets closed, I think it good to review some points I made earlier.....in case the background "noise" overwhelmed anyone else.

1. There's no question that the stock S4 intake system is restrictive when the engine displacement grows...or the cams get changed....or headers get added.

2. Is the stock intake system restrictive on a stock engine? I don't know, right now, but I will know as soon as my first pieces come back from production and I can do some additional testing on a stock engine.

3. The dollar investment in time to do planning, fabricating, testing, and production to make a manifold is huge. I'm going to have a minimum of 50K worth of time and pieces invested, before the first production manifold is completed. (I'm going to take a wild shot and say that any of the production manifolds pictured on this thread cost one hell of a lot more than 50K in initial developemnt.....)

4. Is there a payback for my investment in this tiny 928 world? It's very doubtful. If the payback needs to happen at ten units, I'm guessing the manifolds would be $7500 each. Doubtful that one could sell ten units, at that price. If the "928 market" was bigger and you could plan on a payback coming at 100 units, it might be possible to get the price down to $3500 or so (minimum production run stuff, offshore.) Is it possible to sell 100 complete manifolds for $3500 in the 928 world? Again, very doubtful.

5. Why am I making a manifold, if the payback is a joke? I'm on a slightly different agenda and need this manifold, for my own use. I've got clients with already built engines that will use it. I'm currently building engines that can use this manifold. My future plans have this manifold, in them. If it happens to be applicable to other people, they can use it, too!

6. If things go according to plan, we should have manifolds in the next couple of months!
__________________
greg brown




714 879 9072
GregBBRD@aol.com

Semi-retired, as of Feb 1, 2023.
The days of free technical advice are over.
Free consultations will no longer be available.
Will still be in the shop, isolated and exclusively working on project cars, developmental work and products, engines and transmissions.
Have fun with your 928's people!





Old 03-17-2016, 11:24 PM
  #237  
depstein15
Instructor
 
depstein15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GregBBRD
This thread has been ruined. However, before it gets closed, I think it good to review some points I made earlier.....in case the background "noise" overwhelmed anyone else.

1. There's no question that the stock S4 intake system is restrictive when the engine displacement grows...or the cams get changed....or headers get added.

2. Is the stock intake system restrictive on a stock engine? I don't know, right now, but I will know as soon as my first pieces come back from production and I can do some additional testing on a stock engine.

3. The dollar investment in time to do planning, fabricating, testing, and production to make a manifold is huge. I'm going to have a minimum of 50K worth of time and pieces invested, before the first production manifold is completed. (I'm going to take a wild shot and say that any of the production manifolds pictured on this thread cost one hell of a lot more than 50K in initial developemnt.....)

4. Is there a payback for my investment in this tiny 928 world? It's very doubtful. If the payback needs to happen at ten units, I'm guessing the manifolds would be $7500 each. Doubtful that one could sell ten units, at that price. If the "928 market" was bigger and you could plan on a payback coming at 100 units, it might be possible to get the price down to $3500 or so (minimum production run stuff, offshore.) Is it possible to sell 100 complete manifolds for $3500 in the 928 world? Again, very doubtful.

5. Why am I making a manifold, if the payback is a joke? I'm on a slightly different agenda and need this manifold, for my own use. I've got clients with already built engines that will use it. I'm currently building engines that can use this manifold. My future plans have this manifold, in them. If it happens to be applicable to other people, they can use it, too!

6. If things go according to plan, we should have manifolds in the next couple of months!
Greg, I have scheduled for Colin to install his cams and shark tune on my bone stock 1990 S4 automatic. The only other mod will be xpipe and hi-flow cats. Do you have a prototype intake we can acquire and test as a component in this work? Just wondering if it would be instructive to measure the combined impact of these mods.
Old 03-17-2016, 11:32 PM
  #238  
GregBBRD
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
 
GregBBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 15,219
Received 2,451 Likes on 1,459 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by depstein15
Greg, I have scheduled for Colin to install his cams and shark tune on my bone stock 1990 S4 automatic. The only other mod will be xpipe and hi-flow cats. Do you have a prototype intake we can acquire and test as a component in this work? Just wondering if it would be instructive to measure the combined impact of these mods.
Sorry, I do not. And that would be really interesting to do!

The appropriate prototype is cut apart for production dimensioning.
Old 03-18-2016, 08:29 AM
  #239  
Vilhuer
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Vilhuer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 9,373
Likes: 0
Received 59 Likes on 32 Posts
Default

Greg, if production version is for stroker motors as I suspect it is I want one real bad. Need to start planning some bank job to get finances ready on time. Four days drilling the vault over Easter should do it.
Old 03-18-2016, 01:53 PM
  #240  
69gaugeman
Nordschleife Master
 
69gaugeman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Guelph, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 6,164
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mark kibort
http://www.mustangandfords.com/featu...return-of-5-0/

Just look at what the mustang BOSS did to the power with an intake and slightly bigger valves and some head work. still a tame production car, that passes smog obviously, but the point is. they changed the long runner intake tube for this Aston Martin V8 style intake plennum and are pushing 450hp flywheel in stock form.
they can easily get this to the rear wheels with some minor tweaks.

Now, this is a 5 liter same as the 928 S4.. cams are a little more radical , with 12mm lift vs even the GT 10mm. but again, this is a stock engine. its rated at the flywheel 100 hp more than the GT. i dont know what the cam makes, because its a simlar cam to the coyote engine cam and both have 11:1 compression. the biggest change is head work and this new intake. valve size is 37mm intake. and bore and stroke is like a stroker crank 92mm, but a small bore diameter, 92mm. close to the v8 vantage demensions. it looks like our 100mm bore has advantages in that it uses a much shorter stroke.

encouraging to see that so much can be made from an intake
I'm sorry, but WTF are you talking about. The red highlights prove everyone else's point that the Ford 5.0 is not even remotely similar to the 928. In ANY way. How you can draw the line from that to our engines and saying a new manifold will fix everything is beyond comprehension. The text in green: Um NO! It is not stock!


Quick Reply: Gain 100HP with an intake manifold change?? - Cross post from Ferrari Chat



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:52 AM.