Do these pictures need captions? (32V Intake Manifold Study - HP)
#106
Rennlist Member
Absolutely fantastic work , is there a chance that the stock air filter box will fit even with a slight modification.
The smog ***** will be quick to issue defect notices to anything that is out of the ordinary here in Australia , and they are remarkably switched on to any changes from the manufacturer.
The smog ***** will be quick to issue defect notices to anything that is out of the ordinary here in Australia , and they are remarkably switched on to any changes from the manufacturer.
#107
Official Bay Area Patriot
Fuse 24 Assassin
Rennlist Member
Fuse 24 Assassin
Rennlist Member
Assuming he's using a 90mm throttle body and the airbox opening connecting the MAF is 95mm, you will need some sort of rubber shim or spacer to adapt it to the throttle body (could use something 3/16") assuming the TB is positioned at almost the exact same angle as on a factory S4/GT/GTS for the airbox to fit.
#108
Archive Gatekeeper
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Aren't throttle bodies measured by ID? 90 mm ID plus twice the thickness of the TB wall is going to be awfully close to, say, 95.57 mm.
Might be coincidental!
That said, John, I'm not sure your smog guys are going to miss the giant Medusa-head tangle of intake runners in front of your stock air filter box....
Might be coincidental!
That said, John, I'm not sure your smog guys are going to miss the giant Medusa-head tangle of intake runners in front of your stock air filter box....
#109
Nordschleife Master
#110
Archive Gatekeeper
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
The Cayenne cover is 3 pieces, looks like the trio would be about $200 if cobbled together off of Ebay. Or we could steal one off the next Cayenne that goes through Greg's shop.....
#112
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
Basic Site Sponsor
Thread Starter
Absolutely fantastic work , is there a chance that the stock air filter box will fit even with a slight modification.
The smog ***** will be quick to issue defect notices to anything that is out of the ordinary here in Australia , and they are remarkably switched on to any changes from the manufacturer.
The smog ***** will be quick to issue defect notices to anything that is out of the ordinary here in Australia , and they are remarkably switched on to any changes from the manufacturer.
The stock air filter might be too restrictive?
__________________
greg brown
714 879 9072
GregBBRD@aol.com
Semi-retired, as of Feb 1, 2023.
The days of free technical advice are over.
Free consultations will no longer be available.
Will still be in the shop, isolated and exclusively working on project cars, developmental work and products, engines and transmissions.
Have fun with your 928's people!
greg brown
714 879 9072
GregBBRD@aol.com
Semi-retired, as of Feb 1, 2023.
The days of free technical advice are over.
Free consultations will no longer be available.
Will still be in the shop, isolated and exclusively working on project cars, developmental work and products, engines and transmissions.
Have fun with your 928's people!
#113
Rennlist Member
Just a thought, assuming the 90mm throttle body is used on the new Ford Mustang 5.0s and 90mm GM ones are found on LS2 motors, this throttle body technically flow adequate for an unmodified 928 motor? If not, my theory is that too large of a TB may slow down the charge of air on a naturally aspirated 5.0. The throttle body may have to be smaller, say like an 85mm or even an 80mm.
Where velocity matters is through the runners and especially the ports through the heads, that's the momentum that is going to pack charge into the combustion chamber. Mass times velocity, you want lots of both, at least that's what I read somewhere, once. Makes sense, though.
Greg, this is so cool. Thanks for sharing.
#114
Rennlist Member
Honestly did not even think about this....but I'm guessing it could happen. I'll take a look, when we next have it all mocked up on an engine.....we are actively working on details and it goes on and off a few times each day.
The stock air filter might be too restrictive?
The stock air filter might be too restrictive?
If at all possible, the stock air box as -an- option, will make smog happy state consumers happy.
With the right finish/etc, my smog guys would see your intake, with the airbox..and see it as stock...
They think the 928sRUS EIS is stock...
#115
Rennlist Member
Honestly did not even think about this....but I'm guessing it could happen. I'll take a look, when we next have it all mocked up on an engine.....we are actively working on details and it goes on and off a few times each day.
The stock air filter might be too restrictive?
The stock air filter might be too restrictive?
What might not be OK is the transition into the MAF, seems awfully abrupt to be called a "bell".
#116
Archive Gatekeeper
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
So Rob are you going to be providing Greg the White test mule for this engine to go into...?
#119
Rennlist Member
Some time ago I made a post querying why a BMW E39 M5 type of motor could make 400 bhp when our S4's were languishing at the 320 mark [when running correctly]. We came up with a number of thoughts and the obvious ones came to mind, exhaust, inlet tract, inlet ports cams etc.
It is interesting to see such work and would be just as interesting to know what such could do on a 5 litre motor even if it is designed for Greg's marvellous stroker motors. Jim raises the point about inlet tract velocity and logic suggests that if you can get to the runner inlet with less pressure drop then you can afford to run more velocity with a tighter inlet tract that pushes up the velocity at the valve opening- which i understand is critical to high performanc breathing.
It would be interesting to know if anyone has any theories about what this kind of system could do to facilitate better breathing on an other wise stock motor- I can visualise it making quite a bit of difference but of course the $$'s to do so cannot be cheap and especially so if revised porting were a pre-requisite-hopefully I am not hijacking this superb thread and sure look forward to learning about what it manages to achieve compared to regular ITB type projects and stock inelt plenum on the same build.
Obviously the lack of VVT also carries a penalty although not surehow much that is really worth [25 HP- more?].
Regards
Fred
It is interesting to see such work and would be just as interesting to know what such could do on a 5 litre motor even if it is designed for Greg's marvellous stroker motors. Jim raises the point about inlet tract velocity and logic suggests that if you can get to the runner inlet with less pressure drop then you can afford to run more velocity with a tighter inlet tract that pushes up the velocity at the valve opening- which i understand is critical to high performanc breathing.
It would be interesting to know if anyone has any theories about what this kind of system could do to facilitate better breathing on an other wise stock motor- I can visualise it making quite a bit of difference but of course the $$'s to do so cannot be cheap and especially so if revised porting were a pre-requisite-hopefully I am not hijacking this superb thread and sure look forward to learning about what it manages to achieve compared to regular ITB type projects and stock inelt plenum on the same build.
Obviously the lack of VVT also carries a penalty although not surehow much that is really worth [25 HP- more?].
Regards
Fred
#120
Archive Gatekeeper
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Do THESE photos need any captions?
Ran for the first time today. Running JDS Porsche's Alpha N, no MAF, 90 mm TB, (Greg, how big are the runners??? ) Idles nice with the magic of ST2 v.6.3.0 idle adaptation, revs like a ****, needs a bunch more tuning tomorrow. Might have to play hooky......