YOU WON'T BELIEVE THIS
#121
Shameful Thread Killer
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Lower content of ZDDP is a concern mostly for break-in, and later for flat tappet engines(like 928) that tend to suffer from cam wear. I am using Castrol HD 40 for my break in specifically because it has an extremely high concentration of ZDDP additive, it has a better thermal coefficient(extracts heat better), and because I'm breaking the engine in in TX in July and August. It is not an approved oil for the 928 engine. don't try this at home, and YMMV.
Once break in is done, I'll switch to one of the multi-vis oils with a high level of ZDDP. I think Castrol is still ok, but have to check again.
Once break in is done, I'll switch to one of the multi-vis oils with a high level of ZDDP. I think Castrol is still ok, but have to check again.
#122
Instructor
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: El Cajones CA
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I read that as, any multigrade oils such as 15W50 or 20W50 are approved when them meet SD or SE classifications.
#123
Nordschleife Master
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Apologies to others for any collateral thread damage. This will be my last post on this topic - I dislike thread hijacking by other forum members who shall remain nameless, and would rather not perpetrate the same crime any further.
I'm also confused by your dismissal of the significance of Porsche approval. Whereas Hillary has presented the oil analyses from his methodical oil performance assessments (which, by the way, concur with Porsche's recommendations), I'm unfamiliar with what evidence there is (other than Kibort's anecdotes!) to suggest 20W50 (generally) is superior. Do tell.
I'm also not saying that generally 20W50 is superior. I'm saying that the API standards as applied to oils of higher weights permit more suitable levels of anti-wear additives, specifically phosphorous, one of the key components of ZDDP. 20W50 is just a weight of oil that suits the temperature range of warm climates well in a high-mileage 928 by providing enough pressure at startup, albeit at the cost of reduced flow. Flow on its own is not good, the pressure differential between bearing and journal interfaces is also what prevents metal to metal contact.
Research and google are your friends - I wasn't meaning to make a personal assault on your own choice of oil.
The original suggestion was just a simple means to test whether the poor oil pressure exhibited by Mike's new car is a result of mileage-related engine wear, or a more fundamental physical failure such as a warped plastic journal plug, failed oil-return, of worn bearings (OMG we're heading back on topic!!). If the 20W50 showed poor pressure, he'd need to go deeper into the heads/block with his refresh to make the car a reliable long-term daily driver.
Using a cheap 20W50 would mean the cost in chucking it away when he changes to a decent oil of his choosing for his climate isn't high.
#124
Three Wheelin'
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The original suggestion was just a simple means to test whether the poor oil pressure exhibited by Mike's new car is a result of mileage-related engine wear, or a more fundamental physical failure such as a warped plastic journal plug, failed oil-return, of worn bearings (OMG we're heading back on topic!!). If the 20W50 showed poor pressure, he'd need to go deeper into the heads/block with his refresh to make the car a reliable long-term daily driver.
Using a cheap 20W50 would mean the cost in chucking it away when he changes to a decent oil of his choosing for his climate isn't high.
Using a cheap 20W50 would mean the cost in chucking it away when he changes to a decent oil of his choosing for his climate isn't high.
BTW, check the ZDDP level on the 5W40 Mobil 1 Turbo Diesel Truck formulation I use:
http://www.mobil.com/USA-English/Mot...duct_Guide.pdf
#125
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
![offtopic](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/offtopic.gif)
Actually, the topic was BB79's $3950 '89 S4 that was for sale. The thread took many ups and downs away from, and back to, and away from the actual topic. Many insults and insinuations were thrown around about the car and the seller.
Well, the car is sold. BB79 should close this thread.
We could have new threads... like "Mike's myriad adventures with his recent '89 S4 acquisition", and "What is the best oil to run in a 928 engine -versus any other P-engine that runs at a different temperature; has different RPM maps; and different cooling methods", etc.
I would look forward to that first one.... not so much the second.
![surrender](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/surrender.gif)
#127
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
oh ****.