Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

PCA Club Racing GT rule change-928

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-18-2008, 01:31 PM
  #61  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 166 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

maybe i misunderstood the rules. I thought they are factoring in the displacement to the formula, and the only thing that is fixed is the 16 valve or 32 valve classification and 90 or 100 HP index.

8 valve???

mk

Originally Posted by atb
The only classing for an 8v is in the 5L class. I'm assuming that is max displacement they are referring to? For example, there is a 5L 32v class, and a 6.5L 32v class. Doesn't that mean if you're running a 6L 32v car that you'd be classed with the 6.5L cars? By the same token, if you built a 6L 8v car wouldn't you be over the 5L displacement limit for 8v cars and not legal? How do you arrive at the 6L max displacement? Me no understand
Old 03-18-2008, 01:41 PM
  #62  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 166 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

(3000/(6.0*90))*100=555 GT3

so, a 6 liter 2 valve hybrid would have 555 points, or GT3 at 3000lbs.

if this is the weight as the car comes off the track, its about 50lbs heavier than when both mark and i did speed GT world challenge. a very manageable weight. For GT3, if you could get a big bore 6 liter, using a stock GTS crank rods and custom 968 pistons with a coating , you would be golden! probably be a ripper!!!

Last edited by mark kibort; 03-18-2008 at 03:34 PM.
Old 03-18-2008, 05:01 PM
  #63  
Dennis K
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Dennis K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 1,115
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by atb
How much HP would it take to equalize at 3000lb car with the rest of the field, does the 9K rpm motor get you there?
I dunno. If sub-1:34 at 2004-era Laguna is required to win GT4 at Laguna, you're going need a lot of hp (500 rwhp?) in a 3042 lb car.

Originally Posted by mark kibort
dennis, can you fix the chart and add a 16 valve 6 liter? i think at a reasonable weight , you could still fit one in GT3, No?
I took that chart from the PCA website: http://www.pca.org/clubrace/docs/200...Calculator.pdf

But as far as I can tell, your calculation is correct. For a 3000 lb. GT3 car, it comes down to whether you believe a 6.0L 16V or a 5.4L 32V will make more power. (90 vs. 100 hp/L)
Old 03-18-2008, 07:50 PM
  #64  
atb
Rennlist Member
 
atb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Puyallup, WA
Posts: 4,869
Received 33 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

I get it now (finally), the displacement in the lower charts is just for a quick reference, its not part of the classing, the PI is determined by using the top chart which references only engine configuration and the number of valves per head or whether air/water cooled.
Old 03-18-2008, 08:02 PM
  #65  
BC
Rennlist Member
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,151
Received 87 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

The radiacal cams needed, as well as the lifters, are more available with the 2V configuration. Also its cheaper when you blow it up (and it will, sometimes, at 8500 rpm).

I think that this may be a good plan. But I would go with a stroker and lightweight everything, keeping as much torque as possible, since its still a 3k pound car that needs to get going.
Old 03-18-2008, 08:07 PM
  #66  
BC
Rennlist Member
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,151
Received 87 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

Wait - do these classes allow aftermarket EFI? Because if they don't this entire process is useless to talk about a wicked 5L 2V
Old 03-18-2008, 08:09 PM
  #67  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 166 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

im not convinced the 4valve heads are that much better, than the euro stuff and a little more cam. I guess proof is in with scots car. 5 liter Ljet with a 1.2" x 4" opening, puts out near 300hp, while the holbert engine has made as much as 335 but recently more like 310 to 315rwhp.

I would think that a 6 liter bottom end would yeild some big gains.

to your point, it would be a simple engine to do the big work on . an aftermarket ECU would be the key to take advantage of the 6 liter and the engine management without that crummy Ljet system to strangle the inlet with.

Mk



Originally Posted by BrendanC
The radiacal cams needed, as well as the lifters, are more available with the 2V configuration. Also its cheaper when you blow it up (and it will, sometimes, at 8500 rpm).

I think that this may be a good plan. But I would go with a stroker and lightweight everything, keeping as much torque as possible, since its still a 3k pound car that needs to get going.
Old 03-18-2008, 08:11 PM
  #68  
Jim bailey - 928 International
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Jim bailey - 928 International's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Anaheim California
Posts: 11,542
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

The engine must be an OEM Porsche...modifications are unrestricted but must run on gasoline.
Old 03-18-2008, 08:13 PM
  #69  
BC
Rennlist Member
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,151
Received 87 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

The 2V heads can use Ford Springs, Chevy Valves, or custom valves, and the cam has no gear on it - making reproducing them into bit bump-sticks easier - though you are still limited to the size of the bearings in the carrier - though - in thinking about it, you could increase the size of the bearings in the carrier with a sort of align hone I guess.
Old 03-18-2008, 08:14 PM
  #70  
BC
Rennlist Member
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,151
Received 87 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jim bailey - 928 International
The engine must be an OEM Porsche...modifications are unrestricted but must run on gasoline.
OEM porsche, sure, but what about valves, springs, etc.

Gasoline? Or do you mean "Fuel available at a pump"

Because if they allow ethanol you could do like 13:1 compression or higher.
Old 03-19-2008, 03:08 AM
  #71  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 166 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

Is that block only, as anderson's motor is not too much porsche anymore?

where do they draw the line of what an OEM porsche engine really is?

mk


Originally Posted by Jim bailey - 928 International
The engine must be an OEM Porsche...modifications are unrestricted but must run on gasoline.
Old 03-19-2008, 07:19 AM
  #72  
John Veninger
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Thread Starter
 
John Veninger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 3,928
Received 38 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Wait - do these classes allow aftermarket EFI?
The basic "requirements" for the GT class is a Porsche block, Porsche transmission case and leave the floor pan alone from shock tower to shock tower. Almost anything else is "free".

The PI index is not ideal, but gives way to a few new ideas on how to compete with a 928 in PCA racing.
Old 03-19-2008, 12:14 PM
  #73  
Jim bailey - 928 International
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Jim bailey - 928 International's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Anaheim California
Posts: 11,542
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Rules say "gasoline"... the wheelbase is supposed to be the same and body is to be recognizable as a production Porsche based body ... But as John said pretty much anything goes as far as engine modifications on a Porsche block. so pistons crank rods valves cams engine management induction are all FREE ! as far as the rules are concerned . The ONLY limit is what you wish to spend.



Quick Reply: PCA Club Racing GT rule change-928



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:08 PM.