Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Motor pull! (Rated PG-928 due to disturbing content)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-21-2007, 06:22 PM
  #61  
Bill Ball
Under the Lift
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Bill Ball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Buckeye, AZ
Posts: 18,647
Received 49 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mark anderson
Yes and no. You are correct that the 86 block would take some modification but they are much easier to come by and cheaper so you may want to go that route. We seldom get good 87 up short blocks so they do command a bit of a premium. I have several with thrust bearing damage if someone knows how to repair that.
Yes, I noticed the much lower cost of your 85-6 shortblocks. Can you review how the mods might be done?

I see this other thread on the subject:
https://rennlist.com/forums/928-forum/313612-short-blocks.html

- It looks like the piston crowns are not compatible with S4 valves.

And this comment from Greg seems less than encouraging.
The starter motor mount is different for an '85/'86 engine. The '87-on starter mount will not fit. The '85/'86 starter mount will not clear the flywheel from the '87 engine. The '85/'86 flywheels don't have the tooth sprocket needed to tell the fuel injection what is happening. This pretty much "paints you into the corner". There is a way around it....but it does get pretty complex. I think the averge guy would be happier using a '87-on engine in an '87-on vehicle.

The combustion chamber is about 20cc bigger in an '85/'86 engine, so the piston has a different design to make up the difference. I took apart a stroker engine recently (from another place) that only ran 50 miles before the pistons galled the bores and ruined the block. The builder needed to go back to basic autoshop 101 and forget about building engines. He used a piston design for the '87-on heads with the '85/'86 heads.....not much compression. Combine what with an early (narrow) thrust bearing and rod bearing that were not champhered for the radius on the crankshaft and you begin to get the idea.
Old 06-21-2007, 06:25 PM
  #62  
BC
Rennlist Member
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,150
Received 82 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

The starter on the 928 has had two different mount places, which is the large metal bracket, and early on, it was just bolted to the lower bell housing. While determining the back spacing will be required, you can just put an 87 flywheel on the 86 block, and use the 78 lower bell housing, which, IIRC, Kibort Gladiator man did.
Old 06-21-2007, 06:33 PM
  #63  
Mark Anderson
The Parts Whisperer
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Mark Anderson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Anaheim Ca
Posts: 7,062
Received 373 Likes on 178 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BrendanC
The starter on the 928 has had two different mount places, which is the large metal bracket, and early on, it was just bolted to the lower bell housing. While determining the back spacing will be required, you can just put an 87 flywheel on the 86 block, and use the 78 lower bell housing, which, IIRC, Kibort Gladiator man did.
Yes we recomnend using the 78-82 lower bell housing which the starter can bolt to. It saves several pounds by eliminating that very heavy steel bracket.
Old 06-21-2007, 09:20 PM
  #64  
FlyingDog
Nordschleife Master
 
FlyingDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Not close enough to VIR.
Posts: 9,429
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Ball
The starter motor mount is different for an '85/'86 engine. The '87-on starter mount will not fit. The '85/'86 starter mount will not clear the flywheel from the '87 engine. The '85/'86 flywheels don't have the tooth sprocket needed to tell the fuel injection what is happening. This pretty much "paints you into the corner". There is a way around it....but it does get pretty complex. I think the averge guy would be happier using a '87-on engine in an '87-on vehicle.
Do LH 2.2 and LH2.3 "toothed sprockets" have the same number of teeth? If so, convert to dual disk. That solves the flywheel and starter problems, in addition to improving the rotating mass.
Originally Posted by Bill Ball
The combustion chamber is about 20cc bigger in an '85/'86 engine, so the piston has a different design to make up the difference.
Below are my 5L engine CR calculations.
HC = high compression
LC = low compressions
S2 = 84-86 Euro/ROW S
S3 = 85-86 US
S4 = S4/GT
2cc = adding 84-86 Euro/ROW S sized valve cuts to S3 pistons
8cc = adding 80-83 Euro/ROW S sized valve cuts to S3 pistons
Attached Images  



Quick Reply: Motor pull! (Rated PG-928 due to disturbing content)



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:38 PM.