Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists
View Poll Results: For only a head gasket replacement only on a 16v and no other service work, would you
Pull the motor
67.80%
Leave the motor installed & pull just the heads
32.20%
Voters: 59. You may not vote on this poll

Blown/Damaged Head Gasket?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-21-2019, 11:02 PM
  #586  
Petza914
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Petza914's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Clemson, SC
Posts: 25,919
Received 6,522 Likes on 4,155 Posts
Default

I reinstalled the OEM dipstick to see if the oil I'm seeing is blowing out of that dipstick extension junction.

Also, I've been wondering why my timing changes from time to time when I check it. I decided to test the vacuum advance and retard functions of the distributor with the engine running and think that has been part of my issue.

If I understand the goal correctly, it's to have the timing advanced when the engine is not under load or boost and then pull timing to prevent knock under load and boost. Creating vsccum on the top port of my distributor adds advance and creating vacuum on the underside port retards the timing. Putti positive pressure (blowing into the hose) on either port does not seem to have much effect. I also am not detecting much if any vacuum from the hose connected to the port next to the idle speed screw.

I then figured that coming from the port on the front of the spider body, my boost / vac gauge shows vacuum at idle and under light load but then boost from the supercharger under more throttle, so I'm trying to figure out how I would ever get vacuum onto the retard port when the car is in boost to retard the timing and why I can't just T off that same hose that goes to the boost gauge to run a line from there to the advance port on the distributor. Doing this, at idle and under light load vacuum in that line will advance the timing and when the car goes into boost, positive pressure into the advance port of the distributor removes the vacuum and retards the timing. I drove it with this setup capping off the previous advance and retard connections at the throttle body and it seems to run very well, better than before. On the retard port of the distributor I just installed a small air filter so the distributor can't suck in debris through that port if it somehow ends up in a vacuum condition, but I don't see how that can occur as creating vacuum on the advance vacuum port did not seem to do the same on the retard port.

Question - can improper timing cause only certain cylinders to misfire and not all of them, and could this explain why different cylinders on the 5-8 sides seem to be fouling plugs, or would they all foul about the same if there was a mistiming issue?

Any issue with running the advance / retard this way from that spider body port with my supercharger setup.
Old 09-22-2019, 08:24 PM
  #587  
belgiumbarry
Three Wheelin'
 
belgiumbarry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Belgium
Posts: 1,490
Received 248 Likes on 126 Posts
Default

indeed strange fouling of different plugs ….ignition or K jet ????

i would remove that vac advance/retard on the distributor….. i think this is all emission stuff.... not needed on a supercharged engine.
I did it on my rally car engine but had to fix the base plate , as this one comes "loose" when the vac pod is removed.

Improper timing will be the same for all cilinders.... cannot imagine that would be different for a few.....

Indeed lean, under boost i would like to see 11.5..max 12.5 … not 13.
Cruising in "vac" ( no boost ) should be "14.7"
At idle it isn't important , but 16..17 is lean. ECU's hold it also on 14.7 ….. as on my 850i....

Yes, if you have a non firing cilinder , that one will pump a lot of unburnt O2 in the exhaust …. which the sensor reads as "lean" …. but in fact engine is running richer …. so your numbers will be better once all plugs fire.
Old 09-22-2019, 08:31 PM
  #588  
Petza914
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Petza914's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Clemson, SC
Posts: 25,919
Received 6,522 Likes on 4,155 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by belgiumbarry
indeed strange fouling of different plugs ….ignition or K jet ????

i would remove that vac advance/retard on the distributor….. i think this is all emission stuff.... not needed on a supercharged engine.
I did it on my rally car engine but had to fix the base plate , as this one comes "loose" when the vac pod is removed.

Improper timing will be the same for all cilinders.... cannot imagine that would be different for a few.....

Indeed lean, under boost i would like to see 11.5..max 12.5 … not 13.
Cruising in "vac" ( no boost ) should be "14.7"
At idle it isn't important , but 16..17 is lean. ECU's hold it also on 14.7 ….. as on my 850i....

Yes, if you have a non firing cilinder , that one will pump a lot of unburnt O2 in the exhaust …. which the sensor reads as "lean" …. but in fact engine is running richer …. so your numbers will be better once all plugs fire.
K-Jet

Last drive had me at 12 on boost with the new advance/retard setup on the distributor. The purpose of that on the supercharged motor is to pull timing or retard it under boost to prevent detonation.

My old motor had the distributor with only the advance option.
Old 09-22-2019, 08:50 PM
  #589  
belgiumbarry
Three Wheelin'
 
belgiumbarry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Belgium
Posts: 1,490
Received 248 Likes on 126 Posts
Default

sorry , i meant fouling comes from your either ignition parts or the K- jet

i should check it but i think there is only 1 diaphram in the vac pod…. so boost on the advance side is the same as vac on the retard. If both see the same ( vac or boost ) nothing happens , perhaps a little bit , the working pressure surface will be greater on the advance side as the plunger passes the retard side fixed to the diaphram….
Old 09-22-2019, 09:10 PM
  #590  
Petza914
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Petza914's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Clemson, SC
Posts: 25,919
Received 6,522 Likes on 4,155 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by belgiumbarry
sorry , i meant fouling comes from your either ignition parts or the K- jet

i should check it but i think there is only 1 diaphram in the vac pod…. so boost on the advance side is the same as vac on the retard. If both see the same ( vac or boost ) nothing happens , perhaps a little bit , the working pressure surface will be greater on the advance side as the plunger passes the retard side fixed to the diaphram….
That's what I thought too, but blowing in the hose on the advance side I could not make it retard as much as sucking on a hose on the retard side. It's possible I can't supply enough or the same amount of force by blowing, but I don't know. I can make the advance go away by removing the vacuum, which is also what boost on that line will do and I now just have a filter on the retard port.so not generating any positive or negative air pressure on the retard side.
Old 09-23-2019, 11:26 AM
  #591  
Petza914
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Petza914's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Clemson, SC
Posts: 25,919
Received 6,522 Likes on 4,155 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Fausett
That might be possible, but it is unresearched so I do not know the availability of another idler pulley with a larger diameter. But yes, that should be possible. Lets see how it goes with the Sur-Grip pulley first.
While installing my Sure-Grip pulley over the weekend, while I had the tensioner loose, I removed it, took measurements of the pulley and took it up to my local Napa to see if I could find a replacement pulley with the same ID but a slightly larger OD.

A Napa 38007 pulley has the same 17 mm ID but instead of an 86.79 mm diameter on the belt running surface, has a 90.71 mm running surface diameter, so 3.92 mm running surface diameter difference, or almost 2 mm more encroachment into the belt path with the tensioner fastened in the same position. The only other difference is that the original pulley has belt guiding sides whereas the new one does not but the running surface width of both pulleys is 1" wide and the belt is 0.8" wide so enough margin for error IMO. Since the SC belt is micro v-rib design and both the crank pulley and the supercharger pulley are grooved, the guide sides on the pulley aren't really needed as long as the geometry of the tensioner mount with respect to the supercharger and crank pulley are designed properly and the belt runs true, which it does. Looking at my old pulley which has probably 20,000 miles on it, there is virtually no edge wear on the guide rails so I'm not concerned about using a pulley with out them.

I was able to pull the belt tension further without the fasteners or tensioner assembly bottoming out, so the belt is now slightly tighter than it was previously and I have the Sure-Grip pulley installed. We'll see how it goes with the boost now.

Sure-Grip Pulley Installed



Original SC Tensioner Pulley - note the marks on the tensioner mount from the fasteners are maxed out at the end of both adjustment slots




Running Surface Diameter of Original Pulley




Running Surface Diameter of New Pulley




Number off the new pulley bearing




New Pulley Mounted on Tensioner Assembly




Tensioner Assembly Reinstalled with New Pulley and Tensioned - note running position of SC belt on new pulley (photo is a little dark, but right in the center). Also note, the tensioner fastener position is still maxed out, but because of the larger diameter of the new pulley, the belt is now tighter and the surface area of SC pulley contact with the belt has also been increased ever so slightly


Old 09-23-2019, 11:47 AM
  #592  
AirtekHVAC
Rennlist Member
 
AirtekHVAC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: China Grove, NC
Posts: 3,563
Received 300 Likes on 181 Posts
Default

Dang, awesome work Pete. I hope this solves some of the issues.
Old 09-23-2019, 12:11 PM
  #593  
SwayBar
Rennlist Member
 
SwayBar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chicago Bears
Posts: 3,531
Received 325 Likes on 224 Posts
Default

I know I mentioned this earlier, but I would approach this by simplifying by completely disabling the supercharger and get the engine running correctly/perfectly normally aspirated first.

Once the engine runs perfectly NA - all plugs look good, pulls hard, etc, then hook up the supercharger and start testing again.

This will help isolate one system from another, and narrow the number of variables to consider.
Old 09-23-2019, 12:30 PM
  #594  
Carl Fausett
Developer
 
Carl Fausett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Horicon, WI
Posts: 7,005
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

That idler pulley should work just fine for you, Pete.
Old 09-23-2019, 01:34 PM
  #595  
Petza914
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Petza914's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Clemson, SC
Posts: 25,919
Received 6,522 Likes on 4,155 Posts
Default

Drove the car to an appointment this morning - about 20 minutes each way - and did some experiments.

On the way there, I purposely stayed out of boost to see if the increased pressure from the supercharger might be causing oil to blow out the SOPG or from somewhere else. Arrived at the appt, looked underneath and no oil. This told me it was either the dipstick extension junction (which was replaced with an OEM dipstick last night) or a result of boost pressure.

On the way back, I drove it normally, with some full throttle pulls holding it in boost. I never got that boost pressure release I was getting before and there was way less oil under the car when I threw it up on the lift when returning home, so the mass exodus of oil that would be dripping off the oil pan looks to have been from the dipstick extension. I've ordered a 90 degree silicone hose for my SC BOV so I can rotate it off to the side from where it sits now. That will give me space to get my hand in to the left of to to access the OEM dipstick.

There was still a little oil under there, but more on the A/C compressor bracket, the cross-member skid plate, and a few other places, and I don't know if that was residual that eventually dripped down or if I may have a small leak from the PS front cam seal. I'll keep an eye on it, but oil loss is now 1,000 less.

AFR #s, with the new advance/retard setup on the distributor, during light pedal driving, the AFR ranges from 13-14.5 depending on RPM, load, and pedal position. Under boost, it's at 12. Under vacuum like when coasting in gear it still goes full lean, but I'm happy with these #s for now.

Under boost, I feel like I've lost a little responsiveness from yesterdays earlier drives and think too much timing is being pulled when the vacuum advance line is seeing positive pressure. How much advance can I run when in a vacuum condition (idle, light throttle, etc) so that I can have a little more advance than I currently do under boost. I think from yesterdays testing I'm probably in the low 20s BTDC when under boost and around 30 when under vacuum. Can I move up to more advance under vacuum so I'm in the mid 20s under boost?

Last edited by Petza914; 09-23-2019 at 02:04 PM.
Old 09-24-2019, 11:40 AM
  #596  
Petza914
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Petza914's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Clemson, SC
Posts: 25,919
Received 6,522 Likes on 4,155 Posts
Default

Today's update - all pretty good.

Moved the timing up a few degrees this morning before taking it out. With vacuum applied I'm in the low 30s from idle up to 2,000 RPM. Without vacuum applied (hose pulled from distributor), I'm in the mid-20s. Car starts, idles, and drives fine. More responsive under boost today with the timing change than it was yesterday and smoother everywhere. Boost is not falling off at the higher pressures like it used to either.

AFR #s.
At idle - still lean around 16
Driving along coasting, no throttle - still lean, around 17
Driving along with any throttle I'm now in the 13-14 range all the time, sometimes I'll see it swing up as lean as 14.5
Under moderate boost I'm in the low 12s
Under full, long duration boost I'm at 11.8

Knocklink detector is not showing any knock under high rpm and full boost so the boost pressure retarding the timing seems to be working and preventing that.

Oil leak is minor or non-existent with no new oil sprayed at the engine on today's drive. Had to be the dipstick junction as the primary cause as the SOPG seems dry around the full perimeter currently. Is it also possible that the boost falling off around 4 psi was actually releasing that pressure from the same dipstick junction or would that boost pressure not get into the crankcase like that? If that is possible, that may be what I was suspecting as belt slippage on the SC pulley all along. No matter, the Sur-Grip pulley and larger tensioner roller are improvements to that setup nonetheless.

I'm going to run it this way for a while and see how it goes, then pull the 5-8 plugs again and see what they look like.

I'm also considering doing an oil change and running some SeaFoam in the oil (1-1.5 oz / quart) for a few miles before that change to see if maybe I have some gunked up rings or a hanging lifter that aren't helping the situation. I wasn't thrilled with what the engine internals looked like when I was installing the new pan gasket and would like to clean that up.
Old 09-24-2019, 12:25 PM
  #597  
Carl Fausett
Developer
 
Carl Fausett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Horicon, WI
Posts: 7,005
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

All sounds good.

The tune sounds good except I do not see what the AFR is at cruise. Fifth gear, throttle just in enough to maintain 55 or 60 MPH - what is the AFR then?

Yes - add a bottle of Sea-Foam to your motor oil and see if that helps those lifters loosen up. No harm in that.
Old 09-24-2019, 01:31 PM
  #598  
Petza914
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Petza914's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Clemson, SC
Posts: 25,919
Received 6,522 Likes on 4,155 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Fausett
All sounds good.

The tune sounds good except I do not see what the AFR is at cruise. Fifth gear, throttle just in enough to maintain 55 or 60 MPH - what is the AFR then?

Yes - add a bottle of Sea-Foam to your motor oil and see if that helps those lifters loosen up. No harm in that.
AFR under that circumstance is right around 13.5-14. After that, the more throttle I give it, the richer it becomes, especially as boost then starts building. Before boost it richens to about 13, maybe a little lower 12.8, then as I get into boost it's in the 12s and gets as rich as 11.8 like at 4,000 RPM and 4 psi of boost. It holds steady at those numbers as long as I'm holding the throttle steady.
Old 09-24-2019, 02:21 PM
  #599  
Carl Fausett
Developer
 
Carl Fausett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Horicon, WI
Posts: 7,005
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

That'll do nicely. Sounds like it is functioning as designed. I'd say your tune is finished. I would be reluctant to give it any more ignition advance. Stay where you are.
Old 09-24-2019, 03:01 PM
  #600  
Petza914
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Petza914's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Clemson, SC
Posts: 25,919
Received 6,522 Likes on 4,155 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Fausett
That'll do nicely. Sounds like it is functioning as designed. I'd say your tune is finished. I would be reluctant to give it any more ignition advance. Stay where you are.
Great. Going to leave it as is and drive it for a while, pull plugs and see how things look.

Good thing this one might have just gotten completed because I now have an issue with my 997 that needs to occupy the lift. Low manometer readings, leaned out fuel trims, an intake leak, and rich fouling on the rear bumper

It never ends.


Quick Reply: Blown/Damaged Head Gasket?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:01 AM.