"E" and "D" class?
04-13-2015 | 11:57 PM
#140
Rennlist Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,997
Likes: 2
From: Lexington, KY
Does my earlier answer not count? 
Evan answered this too. Call Buckley, CCW, Jongbloed, or Accumoto. Those wheels work. Some work on your wallet more than others.
R6 275 (15" and 17") fit all day long with the above wheel brands. But I too have heard that the R7 275 might be problematic. You might play it safe with a 245 until you know for sure how much room you have.
R6 275 (15" and 17") fit all day long with the above wheel brands. But I too have heard that the R7 275 might be problematic. You might play it safe with a 245 until you know for sure how much room you have.
04-14-2015 | 11:31 AM
#142
Rennlist Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,271
Likes: 30
From: Left Coast, Florida
Agreed. It sounds ridiculous in a good way. The shifts are lightning fast too.
Astroman: It counts but since R6 are off the table, R7's should be the topic of discussion now 
I gave up and ordered a set of 245-15 R7 rears this morning. The R7 in 275 was just too big and I ruined the tires as there wasn't enough room for clearance. The shoulders on the R7 are massive in comparison to the R6. Even monkeying with it, I don't see how could get the 275 R7 under stock fenders, since the R6 in a 275 rubs some.
Does my earlier answer not count?
Evan answered this too. Call Buckley, CCW, Jongbloed, or Accumoto. Those wheels work. Some work on your wallet more than others.
R6 275 (15" and 17") fit all day long with the above wheel brands. But I too have heard that the R7 275 might be problematic. You might play it safe with a 245 until you know for sure how much room you have.
Evan answered this too. Call Buckley, CCW, Jongbloed, or Accumoto. Those wheels work. Some work on your wallet more than others.
R6 275 (15" and 17") fit all day long with the above wheel brands. But I too have heard that the R7 275 might be problematic. You might play it safe with a 245 until you know for sure how much room you have.
I gave up and ordered a set of 245-15 R7 rears this morning. The R7 in 275 was just too big and I ruined the tires as there wasn't enough room for clearance. The shoulders on the R7 are massive in comparison to the R6. Even monkeying with it, I don't see how could get the 275 R7 under stock fenders, since the R6 in a 275 rubs some.
04-14-2015 | 12:28 PM
#143
Racer
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
From: Southwestern Ontario
Does anyone have an actual measurement of the width of the R7 in 275 vs. the R6? I see that the data sheet published by Tire Rack shows the tires to have identical section widths (10.8 inches), but we all know that the published data is not always accurate.
04-14-2015 | 12:32 PM
#144
Nordschleife Master
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,166
Likes: 125
From: Loveland, CO
04-14-2015 | 05:15 PM
#147
Rennlist Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,271
Likes: 30
From: Left Coast, Florida
04-15-2015 | 01:10 PM
#150
Rennlist Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 15,603
Likes: 292
From: Valencia, Spain
Just checked and the 245/40/15 (83W-$251) has the same rolling dia. as the 275/35/15 (82W $289) so gearing will be unaffected. I bet that mounted on the 9" rear wheel you will see about 10mm difference from a 275/35/15 R6 laying right next to it.. AND save some $$. Run 225 in front, 245 in rear, plenty of grip.