Notices
Racing & Drivers Education Forum
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
View Poll Results: Who won the debate: MK (HP) or VR (Torque)
Mk won with a simple to understand concept that HP determines torque at the wheels at any speed.
25
17.48%
MK won: When comparing equal HP cars, the one with less torque COULD be better on the road course.
6
4.20%
VR won: When comparing equal HP cars, the one with more torque is better on a road course.
44
30.77%
Neither, as physics dont apply to race cars
18
12.59%
I don't want to open this can of worms again!
50
34.97%
Voters: 143. You may not vote on this poll

Poll: Who won the HP vs Torque debate?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-17-2009, 01:43 PM
  #61  
Drewster67
Nordschleife Master
 
Drewster67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 5,848
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Gone for a couple of days and I come back to find the neighborhood up in arms?

Anyone have the Cliff notes version?

TIA
Old 03-17-2009, 01:50 PM
  #62  
mglobe
The Penguin King
Rennlist Member
 
mglobe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Houston
Posts: 9,834
Received 118 Likes on 84 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Drewster67
Gone for a couple of days and I come back to find the neighborhood up in arms?

Anyone have the Cliff notes version?

TIA
Here you go:

HP
Torque
HP
Torque
HP
Torque
HP
Torque
HP
Torque
HP
Torque
HP
Torque
HP
Torque
HP
Torque
HP
Torque
Jane you ignorant ****..
HP
Torque
HP
Torque
HP
Torque
HP
Torque
HP
Torque

Two week break, and then:

"OK, everybody vote to prove that I'm right and VR's wrong."
"Look at me, I'm right, VR's wrong"

Meanwhile the crowd goes: Zzzzzzzzzzz

Did I miss anything?
Old 03-17-2009, 01:54 PM
  #63  
ew928
Owns the Streets
Needs Camber
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
ew928's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 10,292
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I hear the new BMW TDi's cars are pretty good.
Supposed to have a nice torquey motor.


Vacuum works real good. When there's not damn vacuum leak from 20 year old hoses and valvages.
Old 03-17-2009, 01:55 PM
  #64  
Bryan Watts
Drifting
 
Bryan Watts's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 2,585
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Maybe.
Old 03-17-2009, 02:03 PM
  #65  
Veloce Raptor
Rennlist Member
 
Veloce Raptor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Guess...
Posts: 41,789
Received 1,609 Likes on 836 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mark kibort
I found a place where you and your 17 followers so far will be rigth at home.

http://www.fixedearth.com/

Plato = VR (universe revolves around earth) 500AD
Copernicus = MK ( Earth revolves around sun) 1500-current

Mglobe...LOLOLOLOL!!!

Mark, while I really enjoy this sort of bantering, after a while it gets a bit much. Dez' original query which started this whole thing was an excellent question.

The fact that, over the intervening MONTHS since Dez' query, you have started at least 3 additional threads that in one way or other seek to "prove" that you were "right" months ago and I was "wrong", even though I was the only one of the two of us to actually answer Dez' specific question, speaks to just how much I have gotten under your skin. It also speaks to several other things about you which would serve me no purpose to point out, but which nearly everyone here can plainly see.

FYI, Mark, I have no "followers", but your choice of that term is also quite telling.

I hope you have a very nice day.






Professional Racing and Driving Coach
Old 03-17-2009, 02:09 PM
  #66  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 166 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

No VR, the 2nd poll is "could" or "could not" depending on the HP curve.
It is not "surious" at best. It is a dependent factor.

It means that engine torque alone does not make a faster car, anywhere, at any speed, on the race track, guranteed. That is the entire point. You said that the higher torque engine is better coming off turns than a lower torque engine and that is not true at all. there are cases where lower torque engines can produce more REAR WHEEL TORQUE, and accelerative forces that trump a higher torque engine of the same HP. Just because they are not as common, doesnt make your statement right.

Im not losing the poll, even if more tend to your side. The point there would be more work needs to be done!

remember, plato and Copernicus??

VR, the sun doesnt revolve around the earth, although it may apear so and it was written in the bible, and millions believe that it did.

mk

Originally Posted by Veloce Raptor
Wrong as usual, Mark.

Your 2nd poll option is "maybe", and, frankly, is also "maybe not", so it is, at best, spurious "data".

Your 1st option is the polar opposite of your 3rd option, and you are (so far) "losing" that comparison.





Professional Racing and Driving Coach
Old 03-17-2009, 02:16 PM
  #67  
J richard
Rennlist Member
 
J richard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,647
Received 40 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

Well, if, uh....hell I got nothing....
Old 03-17-2009, 02:20 PM
  #68  
jgrant
Burning Brakes
 
jgrant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Kelowna, BC, Canada
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.


All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.
Old 03-17-2009, 02:28 PM
  #69  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 166 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

It was an excellent question. Its similar to ones Ive answered for years in this sport and professionally. I do enjoy this kind of bantering as well. But, you didnt answer Dez's question CORRECTLY, as it was clear to see. I actually did, with the same type of answer that is provided to me on questions I have for the list. somethings DO depend on factors. To say that a big torque engine of equal hp is better than a low torque engine, is doing a diservice to Dez and the entire racing community. Power is paramount! its what moves the car. If you can find an engine in two cars, one with a flatter hp curve, regardless of engine torque, use it. use the car with it. All that you can learn from these threads points too the REAL answer here. maximize HP you go faster. select an engine that gives more HP over any speed range, and you will be faster than someone that has selected one with only a high torque value.

The answer to Dez is still, "It depends". It depends on the shape of the HP curve and nothing more. Although torque values for the same engine can be useful, we were talking about different engines and they come in all sorts of shapes and sizes. Please tell the 200ft-lb , 10,000rpm rotory RX8 Rolex GT car that he cant win races vs the vets and porsches. Forget about car design, just look at power to weight in a straight line. And of couse, dont forget the GT3 WCGT porsches, with 250lbs rewards weight (near same car weight) hanging with vipers and vets on any turn on any straight with half the "engine" torque.

Its power baby! remember, power is the rate of doing work! It tells you the acceleration potential of any mass at and over, any speed anywhere on the track or otherwise. Engine torque is just a number with no meaning unless engine speed is known. Then and only then can we determine acceleration forces at the rear tires! With power, the entire story is already there.

Dez, pick an engine that has a broader HP curve if you are choosing between an engine with more torque vs another.

For VR--- I'm a big fan of torque actually. REAR WHEEL TORQUE, after the gear reductions, AND that is determined by engine HP at any vehicle speed. after all a=F/m! But at the rear tires!

mk

VR, and you do have followers. Your buddy Bull is one of them. Like I said, he is like one of the band members of James Brown. Like Eddie Murphy said in one of his routines, the band members say, "I dont know what the heck "James" is saying, but just say, "YEAH".



Originally Posted by Veloce Raptor
Mglobe...LOLOLOLOL!!!

Mark, while I really enjoy this sort of bantering, after a while it gets a bit much. Dez' original query which started this whole thing was an excellent question.

The fact that, over the intervening MONTHS since Dez' query, you have started at least 3 additional threads that in one way or other seek to "prove" that you were "right" months ago and I was "wrong", even though I was the only one of the two of us to actually answer Dez' specific question, speaks to just how much I have gotten under your skin. It also speaks to several other things about you which would serve me no purpose to point out, but which nearly everyone here can plainly see.

FYI, Mark, I have no "followers", but your choice of that term is also quite telling.

I hope you have a very nice day.






Professional Racing and Driving Coach

Last edited by mark kibort; 03-17-2009 at 02:56 PM.
Old 03-17-2009, 02:29 PM
  #70  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 166 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

"Windy? Im not going to hurt you, Im going to .........................."


Originally Posted by jgrant
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy..
Old 03-17-2009, 02:32 PM
  #71  
Bryan Watts
Drifting
 
Bryan Watts's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 2,585
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mark kibort
VR, the sun doesnt revolve around the earth, although it may apear so and it was written in the bible
It was? Where?
Old 03-17-2009, 02:35 PM
  #72  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 166 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

Why was Galileo under house arrest for the remainder of his life during the roman inquisition?


Originally Posted by Bryan Watts
It was? Where?
Old 03-17-2009, 02:38 PM
  #73  
Drewster67
Nordschleife Master
 
Drewster67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 5,848
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Galileo's presentation of heliocentrism as proven fact resulted in the Catholic Church's prohibiting its advocacy as empirically proven fact, because it was not empirically proven at the time and was contrary to the literal meaning of Scripture.[7] Galileo was eventually forced to recant his heliocentrism and spent the last years of his life under house arrest on orders of the Roman Inquisition.
Old 03-17-2009, 02:40 PM
  #74  
Bryan Watts
Drifting
 
Bryan Watts's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 2,585
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mark kibort
Why was Galleleo under house arrest for the remainder of his life during the roman iquisition?
Because the Roman Catholic Church believed the earth was the center of the universe. That doesn't mean the Bible says it was or is. The Roman Catholic Church, as an organization, believes a LOT of things that the Bible doesn't say. I know people who are Roman Catholics who believe a lot of things the Bible doesn't say, or even mention. For instance, I know a Roman Catholic who thinks the economy sucks right now...that doesn't mean the Bible says it does.
Old 03-17-2009, 02:40 PM
  #75  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 166 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

Here, is this good enough for you?

You have questions, I have answers!

Western Christian biblical references Psalm 93:1, Psalm 96:10, and 1 Chronicles 16:30 include (depending on translation) text stating that "the world is firmly established, it cannot be moved." In the same tradition, Psalm 104:5 says, "the LORD set the earth on its foundations; it can never be moved." Further, Ecclesiastes 1:5 states that "And the sun rises and sets and returns to its place" etc.[86]

KAPOW!!!!!!

Originally Posted by Bryan Watts
It was? Where?


Quick Reply: Poll: Who won the HP vs Torque debate?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:15 PM.