Notices
Racing & Drivers Education Forum
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Having now driven a 911, I have to ask why would you ever want to race one????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-05-2008 | 02:00 PM
  #46  
Rassel's Avatar
Rassel
Drifting
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,277
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by MTosi
The reason the 911's win is because they are built by porsche, not due to the engine configuration. If Porsche wasn't so hung up on the mystique of the 911 they could build a car that would trounce it. I honestly think that next year in the ALMS they will not be able to win, unless they race something other than the 911RSR (I was thinking a flat 8 cayman would work!). There is no way it is going to keep up with the V8 M3 and the V8 vette if they enter the class.
Well you pointed out how good you are as a driver and have a great record. I'm happy for you and I hope you enjoy it very much. There are some serious driving skills in this forum also and people here who work/worked with some of the best drivers in the world. So I think we can leave the "competence" part out of this.

Well known is also that great drivers often depends on great engineers instead of trying to become one themselves. So I hope you don't mind if I say that driving skills is nice but often pros got no f*cking clue what goes on when going into detail.

As you already mentioned, cars are competing in classes. Classes has often regulations. Regulations are often used to make the field competitive. So comparing cars in classes is to compare how they do with a certain set of rules to follow. A 911 is very competitive in some and not at all in other classes. To make one general assumption of all classes is obviously not very rewarding.

Regarding the rear engine design, you can challenge it from two ways. Either from results - where we can see it has not been a failure. Or from a technical stand point where it certainly has its pros/cons too.

As your experience with what you drove, it's impossible for anyone to draw the conclusions from it, since we don't know how that particular car was. Therefore this discussion will not result in anything productive.
Old 06-05-2008 | 02:11 PM
  #47  
MarkSchu's Avatar
MarkSchu
Instructor
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Default

I am relatively new to this sport and to racing but in my limited experience with a D class 82 911, setup is everything, and there are many tricks of the trade that are essential to being able to use the tail heavy design to one's advantage. Driving a poorly set-up 911 is frustrating and miserable; driving a well set-up 911, as other posters have attested, is an incredible experience.
Old 06-05-2008 | 02:27 PM
  #48  
Jarez Mifkin's Avatar
Jarez Mifkin
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,817
Likes: 0
From: Mount Juliet, TN
Default

eh hum (clears throat) I'm better than all you guys, I'm actually the best there is.
Old 06-05-2008 | 02:30 PM
  #49  
MTosi's Avatar
MTosi
Thread Starter
User
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 0
From: Sterling, MA
Default

Originally Posted by Circuit Motorsports
Umm..... yeah it isnt' good enough. Who did you beat? Were they competitve national drivers? The number of people you beat is a good way to pound on your chest and feel good about yourself. The quality of people is the real key. You seem to care more about the number of people you beat by the multiple times you have repeated you beat the owner and 11 other people.

Having run with a number of SCCA national champions and running at the national tour events I'm pretty sure I can say that the fastest guys out there were definitely not the guys steering in opposite lock all the time and sliding there way around the course.


So here you first say you've been forming this idea for a while and then go on to say that Porsche actually does make one hell of a racecar. You're shooting your own argument in the foot.
Originally Posted by DrJupeman
Nah, it is meaningless. I beat 1/2 the field at an autocross once in a Cayenne. Yes, a truck. That's beating ~50 people with their sticky tires and setup cars. I don't recognize my performance as brilliant, I think theirs' was pathetic.
Originally Posted by Rassel
Well you pointed out how good you are as a driver and have a great record. I'm happy for you and I hope you enjoy it very much. There are some serious driving skills in this forum also and people here who work/worked with some of the best drivers in the world. So I think we can leave the "competence" part out of this.

Well known is also that great drivers often depends on great engineers instead of trying to become one themselves. So I hope you don't mind if I say that driving skills is nice but often pros got no f*cking clue what goes on when going into detail.

As you already mentioned, cars are competing in classes. Classes has often regulations. Regulations are often used to make the field competitive. So comparing cars in classes is to compare how they do with a certain set of rules to follow. A 911 is very competitive in some and not at all in other classes. To make one general assumption of all classes is obviously not very rewarding.

Regarding the rear engine design, you can challenge it from two ways. Either from results - where we can see it has not been a failure. Or from a technical stand point where it certainly has its pros/cons too.

As your experience with what you drove, it's impossible for anyone to draw the conclusions from it, since we don't know how that particular car was. Therefore this discussion will not result in anything productive.
My point with Porsche as a manuf., is if you had any other company try to race a rear engine car they would be the laughing stock of the field, and in my opinion the only reason the rear engine design has won anything is because porsche ran it......as I recall Porsche did make just a few cars that weren't rear engine and I have some recollection of them winning also.....

Circuit Notice how I didn't post how many people I beat in my initial post I was there to have fun....I'm not one to thump my chest, nor am I concerned with that, I intend to race prof. so I don't care about my speed in relation to a bunch of club guys, however I do respect them and won't call their performance pathetic, but you asked......

Second no none of them were nationally competetive........whats your point????? just because people don't want to run with the SCCA and run nationally doesn't mean none of them are good......

I don't know if I've beat "nationally competetive SCCA auto X er's" lol, but the proudest moment of my life was when I beat my dad in the same car (It took 3 years, but now I can do it on a regular basis), a professional, four time 24hr race winner (GM factory team, Chrysler factory, and one year with a privateer Porsche team), a skip barber instructor for 15 years, someone who had the record in IMSA for fastlaps in a season (9), raced on the same teams as guy's like Dorey Schroeder and beat them. Someone that Davids Hobbs told "was the fastest he had ever seen someone go through the esses at Road Atlanta". If you had read my previous post's I wouldn't have had to retype it (I hate stooping down to this level of "I know a guy" or "my dad did this" but I keep getting dragged into the mud about my driving by a bunch of people who have never seen me race or met me). Obviously my dad isn't very fast, but it made me proud to beat a driver of that caliber.....I'm sure it still isn't good enough for you, I guess I'll have to find some of those "nationally competetive SCCA guys" but I figured I'd mention it....

Also could we cut out the personal attacks on me and my driving, whenever I get the money to buy a camera and post video, feel free to RIP IT APART, but until then could we refrain from making uneducated attacks...... I started this thread by stating my opinion and asking a question, looking for logical arguments form both sides. Not to get attacked since I disagree with your view point....I thank people like larry have been kind enough to offer answers and post relevent informative responses....
Old 06-05-2008 | 02:38 PM
  #50  
jester911's Avatar
jester911
Drifting
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,064
Likes: 0
From: a slippery slope...
Default

So let me get this straight. You make the statement "Why would anyone want to race a 911" on a board where most of the members at the least drive their 911 on the track and some even drive them professionally and you can't figure out why your not getting any warm and fuzzy responses?

Um okay.
Old 06-05-2008 | 02:39 PM
  #51  
Jarez Mifkin's Avatar
Jarez Mifkin
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,817
Likes: 0
From: Mount Juliet, TN
Default

Originally Posted by jester911
So let me get this straight. You make the statement "Why would anyone want to race a 911" on a board where most of the members at the least drive their 911 on the track and some even drive them professionally and you can't figure out why your not getting any warm and fuzzy responses?

Um okay.

Hey now, he's just trying to get his post count up...let him go.
Old 06-05-2008 | 02:43 PM
  #52  
Circuit Motorsports's Avatar
Circuit Motorsports
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist Small
Business Sponsor

 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,183
Likes: 10
From: Durham, NC
Default

This is the last post for me in this thread. I'm leaning towards bobt993's description. Even moreso after his last post.

Originally Posted by MTosi
Circuit Notice how I didn't post how many people I beat in my initial post I was there to have fun....I'm not one to thump my chest, nor am I concerned with that, I intend to race prof. so I don't care about my speed in relation to a bunch of club guys, however I do respect them and won't call their performance pathetic, but you asked......
Yep you waited till the 3rd post to do that numbers thing.
Originally Posted by MTosi

Second no none of them were nationally competetive........whats your point????? just because people don't want to run with the SCCA and run nationally doesn't mean none of them are good......
So, no they weren't nationally competitve is what you are saying and that supports all of our claims that your beating them in an auto-x says nothing about the car, your driving or really anything else for that matter. You can still be nationally competitve and not run SCCA national tour.
Old 06-05-2008 | 02:45 PM
  #53  
Jarez Mifkin's Avatar
Jarez Mifkin
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,817
Likes: 0
From: Mount Juliet, TN
Default

Originally Posted by MTosi
Second no none of them were nationally competetive........whats your point????? just because people don't want to run with the SCCA and run nationally doesn't mean none of them are good......
Yes it does.
Old 06-05-2008 | 02:49 PM
  #54  
MTosi's Avatar
MTosi
Thread Starter
User
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 0
From: Sterling, MA
Default

Originally Posted by jester911
So let me get this straight. You make the statement "Why would anyone want to race a 911" on a board where most of the members at the least drive their 911 on the track and some even drive them professionally and you can't figure out why your not getting any warm and fuzzy responses?

Um okay.

I'm not asking for fuzzy answers, I just didn't expect a bunch of disrespectful attacks....

Ohh and there are people who races Porsche's who don't race 911's, but sorry I forgot we aren't real enthusiasts, and don't drive real "porsches" my mistake I failed to realize how much 911 snobbery still exists......

Ohh and Circuit, now that I think back I did beat a 3 time SCCA national champion......In his FV, by 2.2 seconds.....I forgot he was a national champion because I didn't think he was very quick....so I didn't think it proved anything, but since you seem so enamored with "nationally competetive SCCA" there you go.....still not sure what that proves but you seem to care....
Old 06-05-2008 | 02:55 PM
  #55  
Rassel's Avatar
Rassel
Drifting
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,277
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by MTosi
My point with Porsche as a manuf., is if you had any other company try to race a rear engine car they would be the laughing stock of the field, and in my opinion the only reason the rear engine design has won anything is because porsche ran it......as I recall Porsche did make just a few cars that weren't rear engine and I have some recollection of them winning also.....
I think your opinion is wrong and can not determine how good the rear engine design is. Simply because a race would then always be won by a Porsche because it was made by Porsche and to me there are so many other parameters on who wins a race than just the brand. It's just too simple to make a conclusion like that. I will not go into argue with this.

The list of what makes a certain car win would take forever to make, will never be complete and is still evolving. Porsche Motorsport surely knows how to pick their fights and play the rulebooks, but they also lost races.
Old 06-05-2008 | 02:57 PM
  #56  
jester911's Avatar
jester911
Drifting
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,064
Likes: 0
From: a slippery slope...
Default

Snobbery has nothing to do with it. If you don't think the 911 is for you that is what you should have said. Not asking everyone else why they would possibly want to do it. You are assuming that because you consider yourself a good driver( you may very well be) and your experience driving it didn't meet your expectations then that should speak for everyone else.

You seem to be the one that is putting your nose in the air with this issue.

If we follow your logic then I guess we all should immediately sell our cars and buy something else.
Old 06-05-2008 | 02:57 PM
  #57  
SundayDriver's Avatar
SundayDriver
Lifetime Rennlist Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 4,929
Likes: 4
From: KC
Default

Some technical points:

1) You ran on 10 year old tires. I assume you know, from all your racing experience, that if the tires are questionable, then everything you feel in the car is questionable. If you have the experience you say, then you have felt drastic balance changes in cars as tires run out of grip due to age or heat cycles. Impossible to say if the handling you felt has any relationship to what the car would do on fresh tires.

2) The 911 is a bad design, perfected.

3) I don't follow the tail out comments from the photo. Maybe I am not seeing it, but the avatar looks to me like a car in severe Understeer, not oversteer.

Some non-technical points:

You have not been here long, and really have little clue about the people, personalities and history of this place. You have come on pretty strong, with a lot of near attacks and pretty much a know-it-all attitude. You have said some silly things in other posts - including on directed at me where you implied that you have seen the content of every video ever made of any decent pro driver. I mention that to show that you really have not bothered to develop much credibility here. Now it is your choice if you want to keep doing battle with everyone or figure out how to make friends. This place is like a neighborhood bar - Everyone I have ever seen (and I have been here a long time) has been welcomed. Those who choose to be obnoxious create their own environment.

Now you get to choose what kind of patron of the neighborhood bar you care to be, and most here will then act in response to your decision.
Old 06-05-2008 | 02:59 PM
  #58  
MTosi's Avatar
MTosi
Thread Starter
User
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 0
From: Sterling, MA
Default

Originally Posted by jmorris3
Yes it does.
I think its called they don't want to trailer there car to topeka kansas for 3 runs, lol

Originally Posted by Rassel
I think your opinion is wrong and can not determine how good the rear engine design is. Simply because a race would then always be won by a Porsche because it was made by Porsche and to me there are so many other parameters on who wins a race than just the brand. It's just too simple to make a conclusion like that. I will not go into argue with this.

The list of what makes a certain car win would take forever to make, will never be complete and is still evolving. Porsche Motorsport surely knows how to pick their fights and play the rulebooks, but they also lost races.
There is a reason no other manufacturer has tried......I can't argue its worse, but if there was an advantage to it wouldn't everyone have clamored to make a rear engine car....lets think about other rear engine cars.....hmm the corvair......
Old 06-05-2008 | 03:04 PM
  #59  
Sean F's Avatar
Sean F
NASA Racer
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,778
Likes: 34
From: Westchester, NY
Default

I am the fastest driver here...my mom told me so.

I drive a 911 because when I drive it without wearing underwear I feel sexy.
Old 06-05-2008 | 03:06 PM
  #60  
Gary R.'s Avatar
Gary R.
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 15,605
Likes: 294
From: Valencia, Spain
Default

Check my "start video", I passed you so i'm now the coolest.


Quick Reply: Having now driven a 911, I have to ask why would you ever want to race one????



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:11 AM.