Should we boycott tracks in need of resurfacing?

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

07-11-2007, 02:06 PM

#31

Geoffrey

Nordschleife Master

Join Date: Dec 2001

Location: Kingston, NY

Posts: 8,305

Likes: 0

Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts

I think the paving fee was spent on paving the paddock area.

Reply Like

07-11-2007, 02:24 PM

#32

Mike Buck

Addict
Rennlist Member

Join Date: Feb 2002

Location: North East, MD

Posts: 2,131

Likes: 1

Received 22 Likes on 10 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by LVDell

Watching the race really convinced me that I have no desire to trailer up there for a DE. Seems like a nice layout but the look of the cars going over whoop-di-dos practically the entire circuit was really bad. Makes me really appreciate VIR. Fast, smooth, and well maintained.

I had the same opinion until I found my way up there to watch some racing in person. Having camped out for the Grand-Am weekend the last two years I feel very strongly about coming back and trying the track out in my own car in a race. The Uphill and Downhill turns there are unlike anything i've seen before and I've driven a bunch of tracks on the east coast here (M-O, Glen, Summit, VIR, LCMT, Mosport, Beaverun)

Reply Like

07-11-2007, 04:29 PM

#33

kingleh

Burning Brakes

Join Date: Apr 2003

Posts: 843

Likes: 0

Received 67 Likes on 17 Posts

i havent read anything in this thread...

but if u do that.. they make less money... and wont have enuff to pay for repaving...

so that would suk....

its not like the racetracks that need repaving are some kinda of buisness powerhouse...