Thoughts on M2
#121
A few thoughts were posted earlier. Sounds like it is all but confirmed they will make an M2 "CS" with the S54. Will def be faster BUT may be limited, even if not will cost more and the added power might change the balance of power / handling for the worse. If you're in the market go for it. Can always trade if you like the other better.
#122
the S55 had issues with the crank hub spinning mostly in modded engines with high torque. Supposedly this is a new revision with that part staked so it can't be loosened.
#127
#128
that's supposed to be the M2 CSL. That edition/variant will likely have the S55 engine as rumored. the standard M2 will retain the N55
the S55 had issues with the crank hub spinning mostly in modded engines with high torque. Supposedly this is a new revision with that part staked so it can't be loosened.
the S55 had issues with the crank hub spinning mostly in modded engines with high torque. Supposedly this is a new revision with that part staked so it can't be loosened.
#130
Surprised as I never liked turbo car but I don't think of my m2 as a car with turbo lag. Thought it was actually quite good in that area.
either way was out at Willow springs with it yesterday. Ran a 1:30:6 in it. Not too shabby on KW CS/RE71r
Three consecutive laps 1:30:6-1:30:8
gps speed are off as wsir has terrible reception but times are from transponder
either way was out at Willow springs with it yesterday. Ran a 1:30:6 in it. Not too shabby on KW CS/RE71r
Three consecutive laps 1:30:6-1:30:8
gps speed are off as wsir has terrible reception but times are from transponder
#131
Surprised as I never liked turbo car but I don't think of my m2 as a car with turbo lag. Thought it was actually quite good in that area.
either way was out at Willow springs with it yesterday. Ran a 1:30:6 in it. Not too shabby on KW CS/RE71r
Three consecutive laps 1:30:6-1:30:8
gps speed are off as wsir has terrible reception but times are from transponder
https://youtu.be/Uygb49R7HgM
either way was out at Willow springs with it yesterday. Ran a 1:30:6 in it. Not too shabby on KW CS/RE71r
Three consecutive laps 1:30:6-1:30:8
gps speed are off as wsir has terrible reception but times are from transponder
https://youtu.be/Uygb49R7HgM
#132
I am running an M2 as DD and also agree there is very little lag. Lots of torque down low but as with modern turbo engines vs really good NA engines you don't get the high revs to a steep peak power figure, and the whereas the NA engine is still sharp off gas the turbo isn't.
Still its a fun car and easy DD with all the things you need at a good price point. Whats not to like?
Still its a fun car and easy DD with all the things you need at a good price point. Whats not to like?
#133
I love my 2017 M2 with new revised I-Drive but may sell soon for a TTRS in June just to toy around and buy a M2 CS a when released.
The M2 is just a nice driver's car. I was so impress I got a E46 to remind myself how the original felt .
Can't wait for next week to see what Porsche may be releasing. May change my lineup.
The M2 is just a nice driver's car. I was so impress I got a E46 to remind myself how the original felt .
Can't wait for next week to see what Porsche may be releasing. May change my lineup.
#135
Ok, so i've now had the car for a couple of weeks and been able to put a few hundred miles on it. so far i really love it! It fits my situation perfectly. great handling, solidly quick, comfortable, back seats an adult can fit into...my Cayenne GTS is getting very lonely. for $53k after a $2k USAA discount, it's a hell of a car for the money.
I prefer it to a mustang or camaro, i just couldn't see myself driving around in either of those, but agree they are performance bargains.
I prefer it to a mustang or camaro, i just couldn't see myself driving around in either of those, but agree they are performance bargains.