Notices
GT4/Spyder Discussions about the 981 GT4/Spyder
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: APR

strut tower failure

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-28-2019, 12:55 PM
  #721  
hf1
Rennlist Member
 
hf1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Northeast
Posts: 10,392
Likes: 0
Received 1,639 Likes on 1,122 Posts
Default

Starting to get serious when shops are noticing and talking about this. I wonder how long Porsche has been aware of this problem with 981 and 991. They’ve been making them for 6+ years now.
Old 02-28-2019, 01:55 PM
  #722  
jasonturbo
Racer
 
jasonturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: North Vancouver
Posts: 265
Received 78 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

I believe these strut towers are cast based on the geometry and the markings, some have suggested "thinning" of the metal due to the forming (forging) process, I can assure you these are not forged.



Looking at the base of the tower, the purpose of the integrated gussets is to distribute the stress over a larger area, based on what we have seen it would appear that the gusset design is inadequate.

My suggestion to Porsche would be to modify the gusset design and increase the radius of the bend where the tower transitions from horizontal to vertical plane, both of these changes could be very effective in improving the distribution of stresses.

Having said that, for the current crop of affected owners, I have to believe that someone will develop a simple external reinforcement plate to improve the distribution of stresses by transferring the loads away from the bend/tangent area where the failures appear to occur/originate. The plate would be mounted atop the strut tower and would extend down the vertical walls of the tower approximately 50-75mm, the plate would be mounted to the top of the tower using the existing strut assembly hardware and would be glued and riveted to the horizontal wall of the tower.
Old 02-28-2019, 02:01 PM
  #723  
benben01
Rennlist Member
 
benben01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Maryland
Posts: 365
Received 20 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CardiffDweller
There was an update yesterday on youtube's "vehicle villains" channel for that yellow GT4 that had the strut tower fail. ....I had a little laugh when the owner wiped off a big deposit from a flying bird off the fender, smeared it onto the tire, then put his hand right into his pocket, then continued to drink his coffee with that hand and the lid off the cup.
Same here.. Saw the video as well.. Guess that's why those Brits are so wiry..

On a separate note, took off all the plastic trim around the frunk yesterday to adjust the driver side bumper alignment to the fender by the headlight area (my ocd'ness). Took the opportunity to inspect the strut towers carefully per the video. It took less than 5 mins to pull off the trim.. Well worth it for the piece of mind to ensure you don't have any signs damage.
Old 02-28-2019, 02:09 PM
  #724  
GoKart Mozart
Racer
 
GoKart Mozart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 415
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jasonturbo
I believe these strut towers are cast based on the geometry and the markings, some have suggested "thinning" of the metal due to the forming (forging) process, I can assure you these are not forged.



Looking at the base of the tower, the purpose of the integrated gussets is to distribute the stress over a larger area, based on what we have seen it would appear that the gusset design is inadequate.

My suggestion to Porsche would be to modify the gusset design and increase the radius of the bend where the tower transitions from horizontal to vertical plane, both of these changes could be very effective in improving the distribution of stresses.

Having said that, for the current crop of affected owners, I have to believe that someone will develop a simple external reinforcement plate that would extend down the vertical walls of the tower approximately 50-75mm, this plate could be glued and riveted to the horizontal wall of the existing tower (In addition to being secured at the top by the strut assy. bolts) and would greatly improve the distribution of stresses by transferring the loads away from the bend/tangent area where the failures appear to occur/originate.

Smells like a business opportunity...
Definitely a casting, now that I see a picture of the inside. The difficulty in reinforcing this, is that the reinforcement needs to be on the inside, and manufacturing a "cup" that fits exactly inside there would be close to impossible to make, unless you have the CAD design of the current casing. Unless a 3D scanning device is accurate enough, but I am not familiar how precise they are? And even if they are, you would then have to make another casing, meaning you have to make molds, which are really expensive and only get cost effective over time, making a lots of parts off of them. The way I see it, we need for Porsche to come up with a fix or recall.

Personally I just hope for the best and that it won't happen to me. Avoid potholes and going off track where I could hit a big bump at all cost. And if it happens then I will make the insurance or Porsche pay for it. No need to have sleepless nights over it. This shouldn't happen, but because they push the envelope making things as light as possible, $hit does happen. GT4 and GT3 are still amazing cars regardless.
Old 02-28-2019, 02:43 PM
  #725  
Yellow Submarine
Racer
 
Yellow Submarine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Flanders EU
Posts: 281
Received 89 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CardiffDweller
There was an update yesterday on youtube's "vehicle villains" channel for that yellow GT4 that had the strut tower fail. The link is easy to find. It was hard to understand the Scottish mechanic through his thick burr but I think he was saying that the first crack started with one of the vertical bolts on the right side of the tower if facing the windshield. The owner said Porsche told him it wasn't covered due to some sort of external forces verbiage. Interestingly, his repair quote was on the order of 5 or 6k pounds. They discussed removing the fender for the repair, plus some of the panels, and pointed out the glue that Porsche uses to secure the strut tower. None of them mentioned using a jig for the frame straightening so who knows. I had a little laugh when the owner wiped off a big deposit from a flying bird off the fender, smeared it onto the tire, then put his hand right into his pocket, then continued to drink his coffee with that hand and the lid off the cup.
Old 02-28-2019, 02:56 PM
  #726  
jasonturbo
Racer
 
jasonturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: North Vancouver
Posts: 265
Received 78 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GoKart Mozart
Definitely a casting, now that I see a picture of the inside. The difficulty in reinforcing this, is that the reinforcement needs to be on the inside,
Why would it be installed on the inside? Aesthetics?

Mounting the plate on the top of the strut tower (The outside) would not impact the overall suspension setup.
Old 02-28-2019, 03:42 PM
  #727  
GoKart Mozart
Racer
 
GoKart Mozart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 415
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jasonturbo
Why would it be installed on the inside? Aesthetics?

Mounting the plate on the top of the strut tower (The outside) would not impact the overall suspension setup.
Not ascetics, just strength wise. The pressure is coming from the inside.. Mounting something on the outside would to little to nothing, unless it was glued/riveted
Old 02-28-2019, 04:12 PM
  #728  
ajw45
Three Wheelin'
 
ajw45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NYC <> Boston
Posts: 1,624
Received 318 Likes on 168 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Yellow Submarine
They also mentioned wheel damage at the busted corner so not an insignificant impact.....
Old 02-28-2019, 04:44 PM
  #729  
jasonturbo
Racer
 
jasonturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: North Vancouver
Posts: 265
Received 78 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

The load is applied to the underside of the tower, anything that takes the load applied to the underside of the tower and distributes it elsewhere (IE: To the vertical plane of the tower) should contribute to a reduction in strut tower failure.

I agree that mounting something on the outside without glue/rivets would be futile, as would mounting anything on the inside without glue/rivets.

It would be very challenging to develop and manufacture a "contoured insert" that would mount inside the strut tower as a interference fit connection. The tolerance that you would need to maintain to effectively distribute the load away from the horizontal plane to the vertical plane would be virtually unachievable due to standard deviation in the manufacturing process of the vehicle/chassis. Assuming you could develop such a clever insert you would then need to resolve other issues such the differential coefficient of thermal expansion between the insert and the chassis under the wide variety of conditions one expects to encounter with a vehicle driven in varying climates and operating conditions.
Old 02-28-2019, 04:52 PM
  #730  
BioBanker
Drifting
 
BioBanker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: West Vancouver
Posts: 2,106
Received 130 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

^ redirecting the forces such that they are focused elsewhere other than the strut tower is likely too challenging, which is why I feel, as a non-engineer or even a person who knows anything about this, that changing the characteristics of the force is probably the better route - ie, lengthen the duration of it so the same impact is dispersed over a longer period = lower power on the tower.
Old 02-28-2019, 04:54 PM
  #731  
GoKart Mozart
Racer
 
GoKart Mozart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 415
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jasonturbo
............... The tolerance that you would need to maintain to effectively distribute the load away from the horizontal plane to the vertical plane would be virtually unachievable due to standard deviation in the manufacturing process of the vehicle/chassis
This is the main issue IMO also. Thanks for wording it so perfectly.



Old 02-28-2019, 05:15 PM
  #732  
Diablo Dude
Race Car
 
Diablo Dude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: California
Posts: 3,935
Received 2,082 Likes on 1,173 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by O5C4R


yeah he’s a legend, worth half a billion, yet will talk to anyone
https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/ind...-60-and-beyond

Tony Quinn talking about toilets...


Old 03-01-2019, 09:47 AM
  #733  
JPR
Racer
 
JPR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Miami, Fla.
Posts: 404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Are the shock towers on the 718 the same as in the 981?

Jpr
Old 03-01-2019, 10:08 AM
  #734  
okie981
Rennlist Member
 
okie981's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: On a pygmy pony over by the dental floss bush
Posts: 3,285
Received 606 Likes on 415 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JPR
Are the shock towers on the 718 the same as in the 981?

Jpr
According to this website, yes.
https://nemigaparts.com/cat_spares/pet/porsche/

Left part is 991.501.477.00
Right part is 991.501.478.00
Old 03-01-2019, 11:45 AM
  #735  
GoKart Mozart
Racer
 
GoKart Mozart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 415
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by okie981
According to this website, yes.
https://nemigaparts.com/cat_spares/pet/porsche/

Left part is 991.501.477.00
Right part is 991.501.478.00
Ouch! So much for buying a new GT4 and avoiding this issue.......unless Porsche changes the part before they start production. Maybe that is why things are getting delayed.


Quick Reply: strut tower failure



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:46 AM.