Notices
Cayenne 955-957 2003-2010 1st Generation
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Turbo S: Different suspension from Turbo?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-08-2011, 12:17 PM
  #1  
90S2C
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
90S2C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: virginia
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Turbo S: Different suspension from Turbo?

I was wondering if there is anything that would make a Turbo S ride firmer than a regular turbo, other than the 20" wheels.

Continental DWS tires ordered.
Old 08-08-2011, 12:54 PM
  #2  
Dennis C
Rocky Mountain High
Rennlist Member
 
Dennis C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 17,533
Received 1,511 Likes on 950 Posts
Default

I'm not aware of anything different. I'm running Continental DWS on my CS with 20" OEM Sport Technos. I keep my suspension set on "low" and "normal", and the ride is quite good.
Old 08-08-2011, 01:22 PM
  #3  
seankrider
Rennlist Member
 
seankrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: El Dorado Hills, CA
Posts: 724
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I thought the only differences between CTT and CTT-S were:
(1) Larger brakes;
(2) Heftier control arms;
(3) Larger intercoolers;
(4) More aggressive ECM mapping;

Maybe I'm forgetting something. I only remember because it seemed like CTT owners have an almost CTT-S with a few mods. Could be the control arms somehow make it more stiff?
Old 08-08-2011, 02:39 PM
  #4  
90S2C
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
90S2C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: virginia
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think it could be the control arms, yes, if they are in fact heftier.
Old 08-08-2011, 04:25 PM
  #5  
bfly
Advanced
 
bfly's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 90S2C
I think it could be the control arms, yes, if they are in fact heftier.
The control arm bushings are different. The CTTS has heavier duty bushings. That could very well account for a difference in ride/handling.
Old 08-08-2011, 05:15 PM
  #6  
Cole
Drifting
 
Cole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Colorado
Posts: 3,212
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

The control arms are actually identical. The bushing is the only difference. Here is a picture from when I put CTTs arms on my CTT.





The CTTs arm is on the left. dispite how it looks the hole in the bushing is actually in the exact same spot. The rubber seems stiffer and obviously the center metal piece is different.

Obviously the CTTs arm is the new one in the picture. FWIW, they cost the same.







The CTTs has a different lowering module in the car so rides a little lower and teh programming may be a bit different. That would account for a ride quality difference. They also got different tie rod ends FWIW. That seems to be the only actual phyical differences I can find so far.









....
Old 08-08-2011, 09:57 PM
  #7  
90S2C
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
90S2C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: virginia
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Fantastic responses, thank you.

The ride today in city driving actually felt improved -- either my body is adjusting or the Yokohama Spec-X tires are getting rid of flat spots, or both.
Old 08-08-2011, 10:42 PM
  #8  
hahnmgh63
Three Wheelin'
 
hahnmgh63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Roy, WA
Posts: 1,743
Received 60 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Yea, the control arms are the same, just the bushings are thicker for a slightly firmer ride. Anyone replacing the bushings in their Turbo should use the Turbo S bushings as they will last longer than the standard ones. The Turbo S also has stiffer steering tie rods and a different height control unit with different front level sensors although I have no idea what changes this makes.
Old 08-08-2011, 11:19 PM
  #9  
90S2C
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
90S2C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: virginia
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hmm...If I want to improve the city pothole ride on my DD Turbo S, should I consider the Turbo bushings?
Old 08-09-2011, 12:42 AM
  #10  
hahnmgh63
Three Wheelin'
 
hahnmgh63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Roy, WA
Posts: 1,743
Received 60 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

I don't know how noticeable it would be, the regular Turbo bushings have a reputation for wearing out early, and I don't know if the bushings alone would make much of a noticeable difference. I think taller sidewall tires would be the way to go. Gentler on the wheels & suspension. The 19" wheels may be the ticket your looking for then with the softest XL rated tire you can find.
Old 08-09-2011, 01:26 AM
  #11  
Cannoli
Instructor
 
Cannoli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: California
Posts: 163
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

There is a difference with the steering rack assembly between the 2004 Turbo and the 2005 Turbo S. Next time you are at a dealership, ask for a EPC print out of the differences - there's a bunch.
Old 08-09-2011, 02:10 AM
  #12  
deilenberger
Banned
 
deilenberger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Spring Lake, NJ, US of A
Posts: 10,085
Received 1,156 Likes on 764 Posts
Default

Interesting. The bushings look identical to the fluid filled ones BMW is so enamored of in the 5 and 7 series (and probably the X5..) Lifetime on them tends to be around 50-60,000 miles. They tear and then all the goodness leaks out of them.

Any sign of staining (may be hard to see on a black control arm) from the defective bushings?
Old 08-09-2011, 05:24 AM
  #13  
bigbuzuki
Pro
 
bigbuzuki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 684
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Quite possible they are fluid filled on the non Turbo S variants as one of the bushings is labelled as 'hydraulic mount' in the PET.
The Turbo S and power kit variants are labelled as 'bonded rubber mounting'.
Old 08-09-2011, 01:28 PM
  #14  
Cole
Drifting
 
Cole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Colorado
Posts: 3,212
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Wink

Originally Posted by Cannoli
There is a difference with the steering rack assembly between the 2004 Turbo and the 2005 Turbo S. Next time you are at a dealership, ask for a EPC print out of the differences - there's a bunch.
First, there is no such thing as a 2005 CTTs. Only 2006. (yes, there re e81 power kit cars in 04/05)

From the part numbers I looked at it's only the rod ends that are different, not the rack.

You can download the PET right from the Porsche.com site and look through part numbers yourselves if you like. That is how I figured out what is "really" different vs. Rumored to be different.
Old 08-31-2011, 02:59 AM
  #15  
Cannoli
Instructor
 
Cannoli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: California
Posts: 163
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Cole
First, there is no such thing as a 2005 CTTs. Only 2006. (yes, there re e81 power kit cars in 04/05)

From the part numbers I looked at it's only the rod ends that are different, not the rack.

You can download the PET right from the Porsche.com site and look through part numbers yourselves if you like. That is how I figured out what is "really" different vs. Rumored to be different.
Ops, you're write about the MY - I am wrong. The 955 Cayenne Turbo S came out in 2006.



Quick Reply: Turbo S: Different suspension from Turbo?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:29 PM.