Notices

New Fastrack out

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 21, 2023 | 11:14 AM
  #1  
stellman's Avatar
stellman
Thread Starter
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 225
Likes: 108
From: Texas
Default New Fastrack out

Lots of P-Car proposed changes.

https://cdn.connectsites.net/user_files/scca/downloads/000/066/396/SEB%20March%202023.pdf?1676989491
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2023 | 12:48 PM
  #2  
edfishjr's Avatar
edfishjr
Burning Brakes
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,012
Likes: 223
From: Huntsville, AL
Default

No new Porsches in BS, but they move the Model 3 back from SS to BS, skipping AS in both directions. Seems strange.

I think the turbo-4 718s can compete in AS on courses where turbo-lag doesn't play a big role. I don't know enough about 991s to comment on AS competitiveness.

The 987.1 Cayman would be fun in CS, but I won't own an M96/97 car. The 987.2 non-S in CS would sorely tempt me, but I guess it's not going to happen, though it is no longer competitive in BS. But they put the Supra turbo-4cyl in CS? I wonder what it weighs. That might actually be a threat to the ND2.

Last edited by edfishjr; Feb 21, 2023 at 07:33 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2023 | 01:14 PM
  #3  
Auto_Werks 3.6's Avatar
Auto_Werks 3.6
Quit Smokin'
Rennlist Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,112
Likes: 493
From: Columbus, Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by edfishjr
No new Porsches in BS, but they move the Model 3 back from SS to BS, skipping AS in both directions. Seems strange.

I think the turbo-4 718s can compete in AS on courses where turbo-lag doesn't play a big role. I don't know enough about 991s to comment on AS competitiveness.

The 987.1 Cayman would be fun in CS, but I won't own an M96/97 car. The 987.2 non-S in CS would sorely tempt me, but I guess it's not going to happen, though it is no longer competitive in BS. But they put the Supra turbo-4cyl in CS? I wonder what it weights. That might actually be a threat to the ND2.
The SEB is willing to die on the hill that 981 caymans should stay in AS because one champion caliber driver had success in the GTS PDK version. The GTS having about 20hp and 7% gearing advantage over both transmission versions of the 981S...

They also just decided to say that "the manufacturer doesn't classify a muffler as an emissions device" in regard to the GT4 muffler issue.... The whole complication is that the muffler was covered by the emissions warranty. Why not say that mufflers which serve no other purpose than noise emssions can be replaced in street class, rather than just making up an answer that is only half true?

Those people are so bad at what they do, it's not even worth writing a letter.

Last edited by Auto_Werks 3.6; Feb 21, 2023 at 01:18 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2023 | 02:26 PM
  #4  
chriswd62's Avatar
chriswd62
Pro
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 625
Likes: 366
From: South Jersey
Default

Street Category
#33348 Clarity on rear muffler change allowance in Street Class Thank you for your letter. According to the manufacturer the Cayman GT4 muffler is not classified as an emissions control device. Therefore, it is legal to be replaced per section 13.10.C. Other exhaust components classified as as emissions control devices per the manufacturer may not be replaced regardless of their position in the exhaust system
I'm very happy the SEB finally addressed this formally. You're welcome.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2023 | 04:41 PM
  #5  
RacingChris44's Avatar
RacingChris44
Instructor
 
Joined: Feb 2022
Posts: 114
Likes: 65
Default

How do we provide feedback to the SEB? They are suggesting moving the S and GTS 718's to AS, but nothing of the base 718 to BS...This seems pretty thoughtless
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2023 | 04:44 PM
  #6  
Auto_Werks 3.6's Avatar
Auto_Werks 3.6
Quit Smokin'
Rennlist Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,112
Likes: 493
From: Columbus, Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by RacingChris44
How do we provide feedback to the SEB? They are suggesting moving the S and GTS 718's to AS, but nothing of the base 718 to BS...This seems pretty thoughtless
www.sebscca.com

I'm pretty sure the thoughtlessness is deliberate, for the same reason they won't touch the 981. It probably wasn't completely an after thought

Congrats on your new car, by the way! hope to see you at an event this year!
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2023 | 04:46 PM
  #7  
Auto_Werks 3.6's Avatar
Auto_Werks 3.6
Quit Smokin'
Rennlist Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,112
Likes: 493
From: Columbus, Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by chriswd62
I'm very happy the SEB finally addressed this formally. You're welcome.
Just an FYI, because the SEB handled this improperly, there is already push-back on this decision at a national level. Don't buy your mufflers just yet.

Reply

Trending Topics

Old Feb 21, 2023 | 04:53 PM
  #8  
RacingChris44's Avatar
RacingChris44
Instructor
 
Joined: Feb 2022
Posts: 114
Likes: 65
Default

Thank you! I will be at the Champ Tour showing those C6Z's and (apparently) S and GTS 718's how to go fast in AS. I will say though, while I'm still breaking it in, the T feels phenomenal. Looking forward to racing it for sure!
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2023 | 07:56 PM
  #9  
BmacIL's Avatar
BmacIL
Rennlist Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2021
Posts: 390
Likes: 108
From: Illinois
Default

All this and my 997.1 to BS got a TYFYI. SMH....
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2023 | 08:04 PM
  #10  
Z3papa's Avatar
Z3papa
Rennlist Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2020
Posts: 533
Likes: 187
From: Bloomington, IL
Default

Originally Posted by edfishjr
No new Porsches in BS, but they move the Model 3 back from SS to BS, skipping AS in both directions. Seems strange.

I think the turbo-4 718s can compete in AS on courses where turbo-lag doesn't play a big role. I don't know enough about 991s to comment on AS competitiveness.

The 987.1 Cayman would be fun in CS, but I won't own an M96/97 car. The 987.2 non-S in CS would sorely tempt me, but I guess it's not going to happen, though it is no longer competitive in BS. But they put the Supra turbo-4cyl in CS? I wonder what it weighs. That might actually be a threat to the ND2.
I'm definitely supporting this recommendation and will work on letter and data to support this.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2023 | 08:17 PM
  #11  
sgreer78's Avatar
sgreer78
Burning Brakes
5 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 884
Likes: 700
From: St Louis, MO
Default

My GT4 to HS letter was ignored again.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2023 | 09:48 PM
  #12  
edfishjr's Avatar
edfishjr
Burning Brakes
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,012
Likes: 223
From: Huntsville, AL
Default

Originally Posted by sgreer78
My GT4 to HS letter was ignored again.
I bet they didn't even give you a reply.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2023 | 10:01 PM
  #13  
Formulabob's Avatar
Formulabob
Rennlist Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 148
Likes: 69
From: Florida - East Coast
Default

Originally Posted by Auto_Werks 3.6

They also just decided to say that "the manufacturer doesn't classify a muffler as an emissions device" in regard to the GT4 muffler issue.... The whole complication is that the muffler was covered by the emissions warranty. Why not say that mufflers which serve no other purpose than noise emssions can be replaced in street class, rather than just making up an answer that is only half true?

Those people are so bad at what they do, it's not even worth writing a letter.
Muffler and OAP are emissions devices in California and the 13 states that follow Cali rules. In the other 36 states, neither the muffler nor OAPs are covered by emissions warranty. So, do we follow Cali rules or Federal rules? My letter to the SEB on this (33372) in November 2022 requesting a policy decision apparently still is being reviewed/considered.

Bob L

Last edited by Formulabob; Feb 21, 2023 at 10:04 PM. Reason: Missing “policy decision”
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2023 | 03:44 PM
  #14  
Auto_Werks 3.6's Avatar
Auto_Werks 3.6
Quit Smokin'
Rennlist Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,112
Likes: 493
From: Columbus, Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by Formulabob
Muffler and OAP are emissions devices in California and the 13 states that follow Cali rules. In the other 36 states, neither the muffler nor OAPs are covered by emissions warranty. So, do we follow Cali rules or Federal rules? My letter to the SEB on this (33372) in November 2022 requesting a policy decision apparently still is being reviewed/considered.

Bob L
That sounds about right. I'm not planning on buying a GT4, but it seems like common sense that they should be able to change out a muffler. I messaged with Ron Bauer yesterday, and if I'm understanding correctly he wants to leverage this situation to have the SEB allow more emissions modifications. I'm not sure that makes sense to me, but it would be better than the SEB publishing a comment that is generally known to be untrue instead of doing their job to address actual issues.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2023 | 09:08 PM
  #15  
Z3papa's Avatar
Z3papa
Rennlist Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2020
Posts: 533
Likes: 187
From: Bloomington, IL
Default

Originally Posted by Auto_Werks 3.6
That sounds about right. I'm not planning on buying a GT4, but it seems like common sense that they should be able to change out a muffler. I messaged with Ron Bauer yesterday, and if I'm understanding correctly he wants to leverage this situation to have the SEB allow more emissions modifications. I'm not sure that makes sense to me, but it would be better than the SEB publishing a comment that is generally known to be untrue instead of doing their job to address actual issues.
I just don't get too worked over a cat back exhaust which is so close to where it terminates and as such never considered replacing the OE sport unit that comes with the GTS which isn't necessarily inspiring.
Reply



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:35 AM.