Notices
997 GT2/GT3 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Porsche North Houston

RA1 vs R6 setup on 2010/11 GT3RS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-20-2012, 05:51 PM
  #91  
TRAKCAR
Rennlist Member
 
TRAKCAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: S. Florida
Posts: 29,387
Received 1,631 Likes on 758 Posts
Default

I've seen your duno proving that the 510 is understated.

You and the Fiat engineers deserve each other.
Old 06-20-2012, 05:52 PM
  #92  
Izzone
Nordschleife Master
 
Izzone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 7,342
Received 292 Likes on 147 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NJ-GT
Originally Posted by Izzone
you get a wing I need a diffuser.....

Ferrari’s engineers worked to increase downforce, adopting a more pronounced profile of the lower bumper’s leading edge, a new central lower flap, more angular front air intakes in the bumper and wider-meshed grilles. At the rear, the gain in downforce over the front axle is balanced by a more prominent nolder on the leading edge of the tail, and a completely re-designed rear diffuser.

In this configuration, the 430 Scuderia’s bodywork generates 75 kg (165 lbs) of downforce at 150 km/h (93 mph) and over 300 kg (660 lbs) at maximum speed.
The same marketing material says that my car weighs 2,750 lbs, and my car has 510Hp.

Dyno proved them wrong. Scales proved them wrong. And Wind tunnel testing by independent source proved them wrong.

Fiat engineers are full of crap.
Then beetle engineers are full of crap too

I guess fiat us wrong , u have 500 who not 510 at crank
Old 06-22-2012, 11:44 PM
  #93  
Veloce Raptor
Rennlist Member
 
Veloce Raptor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Guess...
Posts: 41,755
Received 1,542 Likes on 815 Posts
Default

Update: Juan sent me Aim data that was in the wrong format for Race Studio Analysis. Waiting for the proper format.



Quick Reply: RA1 vs R6 setup on 2010/11 GT3RS



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:53 PM.