Notices
997 GT2/GT3 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Porsche North Houston

Mk 2 RS Track Alignment How much Neg Camber?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-03-2010, 03:44 PM
  #1  
Bob Rouleau

Still plays with cars.
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Thread Starter
 
Bob Rouleau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Montreal
Posts: 15,078
Received 256 Likes on 119 Posts
Default Mk 2 RS Track Alignment How much Neg Camber?

Has anyone figured out the right camber settings yet? I began with neg 1.5 all around. No enough. Then went to 2.1 in front and 1.8 in the rear. Fairly even wear on the Hoosier R6 in back but the fronts show too much wear on the outside.

Conventional wisdom is that the Mk 2 needs less camber than the Mk 1. On the 2007 RS I ran neg 2.5 in front and neg 2.2 in the rear.

Is the 2010 version really different? With wider front wheels than the 07 model I can see slightly less neg camber in front. If nobody has a better idea, I plan on trying neg 2.3 Front and Neg 2.0 in back.

Best,
Old 06-03-2010, 04:11 PM
  #2  
TRAKCAR
Rennlist Member
 
TRAKCAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: S. Florida
Posts: 29,419
Received 1,665 Likes on 773 Posts
Default

I began with -2 all around, car felt great, even temps across the tires.
I tried -1.5 front and it was no good. I will go -2R and -2.5F next time out also.

I ran -2.3F and -1.8R on my MKI GT3.
Old 06-03-2010, 04:57 PM
  #3  
997gt3north
Drifting
 
997gt3north's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,188
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bob Rouleau
Has anyone figured out the right camber settings yet? I began with neg 1.5 all around. No enough. Then went to 2.1 in front and 1.8 in the rear. Fairly even wear on the Hoosier R6 in back but the fronts show too much wear on the outside.

Conventional wisdom is that the Mk 2 needs less camber than the Mk 1. On the 2007 RS I ran neg 2.5 in front and neg 2.2 in the rear.

Is the 2010 version really different? With wider front wheels than the 07 model I can see slightly less neg camber in front. If nobody has a better idea, I plan on trying neg 2.3 Front and Neg 2.0 in back.

Best,
my guess is that it will be the exact same setup
many mk1 users were running 9" front rims for track tires
most ended up in the -2.5F, -2.2R range (for combo track street setup)

the 2010 cup cars running at Mosport in the World Challenge 2 weeks ago on 18" R888s (the spec tire) were running basically (-2.8F, -2.5r) - i was there, i knew a driver, hang out with the team and specifically asked this question

2007 cups running Mich Slicks run -4 on all corners at Mosport - the even front to back camber is because of the much smaller rear tire width compared to our street setup and the World Challenge Setup I quoted above

yes suspension stuff has changed between 996, 997mk1 and 997mk2 but it still seems similar cambers work on all these cars, slightly more in the front than the rear with slightly lower rear camber as the rear rim and tire has gotten wider

Last edited by 997gt3north; 06-03-2010 at 06:12 PM.
Old 06-03-2010, 05:07 PM
  #4  
lawjdc
Three Wheelin'
 
lawjdc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Bob, are you running 18's or 19's with your Hoosiers?
Old 06-03-2010, 05:11 PM
  #5  
Nizer
Rennlist Member
 
Nizer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Wishing I Was At The Track
Posts: 13,658
Received 1,883 Likes on 971 Posts
Default

Are you running stock ride height?
Old 06-03-2010, 05:37 PM
  #6  
NJ-GT
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
NJ-GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Los Everglades
Posts: 6,583
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bob Rouleau
Conventional wisdom is that the Mk 2 needs less camber than the Mk 1. On the 2007 RS I ran neg 2.5 in front and neg 2.2 in the rear.
Bob, you meant conventional assumption.

Nothing has changed drastically in the GT3 suspension since the 1999. The car is still using struts-type up front and multi-link (5) in the rear. Porsche has stiffen the body, the sway bars the spring rates, made the wheels and tires widers, but the essential suspension design is the same.

The 1998 GT3 Cup up to the current 2010 GT3 Cup are running very similar alignment settings. They run more negative camber due to slicks. They also run more negative camber in the front compared to the rear. The Cup cars have experienced more drastic changes than the street GT3s.

Typically the 996/997 requires -0.5 to -1.0 extra negative camber in the front compared to the rear. However, the street settings provide -1.0 more negatice camber in the rear compared to the front (to promote the safe understeer).

Hoosier R6/A6 (very common track tires) recommends -3.0 degrees camber. I ran them at -2.5 to -3.5 front and -2.5 rear. I liked the car balance better with -3.5 front and -2.5 rear.

For street driving, I would just run the stock settings, but I don't setup my cars for street driving.
Old 06-03-2010, 06:50 PM
  #7  
roberga
Nordschleife Master
 
roberga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: SEATTLE
Posts: 5,165
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TRAKCAR
I began with -2 all around, car felt great, even temps across the tires.
I tried -1.5 front and it was no good. I will go -2R and -2.5F next time out also.

I ran -2.3F and -1.8R on my MKI GT3.
that worked well on my 996 and 997 GT3s. -2.0 f -2.5 r. The only issue is if you put street miles on it the rears will cords out quickly.
Old 06-03-2010, 09:49 PM
  #8  
Bob Rouleau

Still plays with cars.
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Thread Starter
 
Bob Rouleau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Montreal
Posts: 15,078
Received 256 Likes on 119 Posts
Default

Thanks guys. On my 07 RS I ran 2.5 neg F and 2.2 Neg R which was perfect on Hoosier R6 18 inch tires.

I think I'll go for the same setup and see what happens. I can confirm that 2.1 Neg in front is not enough using 245 18 inch Hoosiers.

Best,
Old 06-03-2010, 10:18 PM
  #9  
mooty
GT3 player par excellence
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
mooty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: san francisco
Posts: 43,464
Received 5,747 Likes on 2,353 Posts
Default

i drove RS on track 2x. i took temp and i cannot see how anything less than 2 would work.
Old 06-03-2010, 10:28 PM
  #10  
roberga
Nordschleife Master
 
roberga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: SEATTLE
Posts: 5,165
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

mooty, what is going on with the blue tape? A detail before Sears Point?
Old 06-03-2010, 10:34 PM
  #11  
mooty
GT3 player par excellence
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
mooty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: san francisco
Posts: 43,464
Received 5,747 Likes on 2,353 Posts
Default

new girls always get detailed first. i need to feel them up before i take them out.
Old 06-04-2010, 07:44 AM
  #12  
Nizer
Rennlist Member
 
Nizer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Wishing I Was At The Track
Posts: 13,658
Received 1,883 Likes on 971 Posts
Default

Looks like a Griot's Garage advertisement.
Old 06-04-2010, 07:15 PM
  #13  
malmasri
Rennlist Member
 
malmasri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: close to Mid- Ohio
Posts: 2,044
Received 50 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bob Rouleau
Thanks guys. On my 07 RS I ran 2.5 neg F and 2.2 Neg R which was perfect on Hoosier R6 18 inch tires.

I think I'll go for the same setup and see what happens. I can confirm that 2.1 Neg in front is not enough using 245 18 inch Hoosiers.

Best,
Bob: We are waiting for you to finnaly post the appropriate and final set up
worth noting that there is a tremendous difference with a Guards LSD installed...perhaps prior to messing with the Camber..etc.
Old 06-04-2010, 08:43 PM
  #14  
Bob Rouleau

Still plays with cars.
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Thread Starter
 
Bob Rouleau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Montreal
Posts: 15,078
Received 256 Likes on 119 Posts
Default

Agree about the effects of a better LSD but with so few track miles on my car the wear on the outside edges is strictly a lack of negative camber. I now have neg 2.4 in front neg 2.2 in back. I was able to get 2.4 without rotating the struts or adding shims. Off to the track tomorrow to test. I suspect that the setup will end up being the same as the Mk 1 RS. I would have gone for neg 2.5 in front but I did not have shims handy.
Old 06-05-2010, 12:12 AM
  #15  
mooty
GT3 player par excellence
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
mooty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: san francisco
Posts: 43,464
Received 5,747 Likes on 2,353 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Nizer
Looks like a Griot's Garage advertisement.
u think?

good eyes!
i buy speedshine & spray on wax 20 gallon at a time.
over 400 cotton towels (white with red edges, you know what i am talking about if you recognized griots)
over 200 microfiber clothes.
and......

why i have so many. when i wash towels with wax smell, i get chewed out by wife. so with 600+ towels i wash them every 2.5 months or so (i wash at least one car a week for therapy), so i only get scolded every 2. 5 months. when i used to wash them every weekend.... i get yelled at every week...

i supposed washing kids clothes with towels drenched in 3M adhesive remover didn't help... but i LOVE that smell.... explains why i am a little off the wall.


Quick Reply: Mk 2 RS Track Alignment How much Neg Camber?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:46 PM.