Notices
997 Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Any 2006 Range Rover Sport Supercharged owners out there?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-04-2007, 07:32 PM
  #1  
victor108
AutoX
Thread Starter
 
victor108's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Any 2006 Range Rover Sport Supercharged owners out there?

I currently have a 997S and was thinking of pick up a clean used 2006 Range Rover Sport Supercharged. I have heard of some electrical issues and wanted to get any ones opinions out there.


Thanks in advance,

Victor victor108@yahoo.com

Last edited by victor108; 09-04-2007 at 07:35 PM. Reason: forgot email
Old 09-04-2007, 08:01 PM
  #2  
Edgy01
Poseur
Rennlist Member
 
Edgy01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 17,699
Received 231 Likes on 126 Posts
Default

People would admit to OWNING one of those? Beware Lucas...Prince of Darkness...
Old 09-04-2007, 08:05 PM
  #3  
nkhalidi
Rennlist Member
 
nkhalidi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: NYC / FL
Posts: 1,311
Received 10 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

When a RR Sport SC is slower, more expensive, and has worse residuals than a Cayenne S, why bother?
Old 09-04-2007, 08:42 PM
  #4  
LvnLrg213
Intermediate
 
LvnLrg213's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Coral Gables, Florida
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Wonderful truck, its my daily driver. Would highly recommend. 12,000 miles, no issues. PM with any questions.
Old 09-04-2007, 10:22 PM
  #5  
Rick in Colorado
Instructor
 
Rick in Colorado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Evergreen, CO
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Have you considered a Jeep Grand Cherokee with the Hemi? Or, if you don't live in the snowbelt, a GC SRT8. Both are cheaper brand new than a used RR.

Jeep is the basically the (unofficial) "official" SUV of the Rockies. They're tough and make a statement about practicality over flash. Quicker than the RR as well (especially the SRT8).
Old 09-04-2007, 10:32 PM
  #6  
Carcam
Rennlist Member
 
Carcam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,328
Received 238 Likes on 98 Posts
Default

I have the '07 Rover SC and really like it. No electrical issues (yet). It's my 5th Rover and I've had a few minor issues with previous ones but nothing big (steering wheel not returning to preset, air suspension). It's a very capable and quiet cruiser, great visibilty and comfort. Actually had more problems with my Cayenne Turbo (first year intro things). The power is just right for an SUV- not overpowering but more than adequate. A great complement to the 911.
Old 09-04-2007, 11:04 PM
  #7  
oalvarez
Three Wheelin'
 
oalvarez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: los angeles
Posts: 1,341
Received 53 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

we're on our 4th rover. we own a '06 sport (not supercharged) and have been nothing but pleased with it along with the previous three (knock on wood). nothing but a pleasant experience and we're working on the beginning of our third year with it.

not certain what your needs are but you might consider an RS4 before the Rover unless you absolutely need the utility space that the truck offers.

best success
Old 09-04-2007, 11:19 PM
  #8  
ELUSIVE
Rennlist Member
 
ELUSIVE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,883
Received 22 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nkhalidi
When a RR Sport SC is slower, more expensive, and has worse residuals than a Cayenne S, why bother?
Because it's not ugly.
Old 09-05-2007, 12:04 AM
  #9  
STATMAN
Rennlist Member
 
STATMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 627
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Victor,

Go for the Cayenne S or Cayenne Turbo. In either case, you will have a faster and more sporting vehicle that is likely to be on the road (as opposed to in the shop) a lot more than the RR. With the new 2008 body style, you could pick up a used 2006 or earlier model for a good price. I love my CS.
Old 09-05-2007, 10:09 AM
  #10  
Alstoy
Burning Brakes
 
Alstoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 941
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Victor,

I got an odd call from the local dealer to test-drive the RRS over the weekend. I was not in the market for a 14 mph SUV, but I really liked it. IMHO there is a lot of BMW in the genes, specially on the inside. The ride is not soft or hard, but a compromise. It is a very heavy car. This may sound silly but, it is very nice looking. From what I gather the ride quality on the SC is more harsh and the extra 90 hp will get you from slow to less slow. Others here can speak more to this. I also liked the fact that a lot of the stuff is standard. Not like our cars where we have to pay $3,000 for wiper blades (joke). The RRS comes standard with NAV, BT, phone, etc. A base price of about $60k or SC for about $72k gets you a lot.

My advise would be to call up your local dealer to see if they have the same weekend test-drive.

Cheers.
Old 09-05-2007, 10:25 AM
  #11  
1Carnut
Pro
 
1Carnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 593
Received 75 Likes on 47 Posts
Default

I have a Range Rover not a sport, and it is a great SUV, mine has the luxury pack and the monitors behind the seats for my boys. It goes through anything, is big and unlike my Cayenne Turbo it does not need two sets of wheels and tires, and has had spent alot less time at the dealer. It was the only Porsche (out of 39 total) I ever regretted buying.
Old 09-05-2007, 10:58 AM
  #12  
texas911
Race Car
 
texas911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 4,053
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I have a RRS S/C. Love it. Enough power and the Active suspension is awesome. Buy a sports car from a sports car company, buy an SUV from an SUV company. Plus, its easily the best looking SUV out there. Not a lick of problem with mine, and LR still has free maintenance so that's not a worry. Its funny that people are saying that Cayennes are reliable. I recommend it, but I wouldn't consider it a bargain at $70K.
Old 09-05-2007, 12:33 PM
  #13  
villajoe
Advanced
 
villajoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: SW FL
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ELUSIVE
Because it's not ugly.
+1
Old 09-05-2007, 12:40 PM
  #14  
villajoe
Advanced
 
villajoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: SW FL
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rick in Colorado
Have you considered a Jeep Grand Cherokee with the Hemi? Or, if you don't live in the snowbelt, a GC SRT8. Both are cheaper brand new than a used RR.

Jeep is the basically the (unofficial) "official" SUV of the Rockies. They're tough and make a statement about practicality over flash. Quicker than the RR as well (especially the SRT8).
The SRT8 Jeep clocked 0-60 in 4.4 seconds I think in Motor Trend or C&D...that is nuts! Faster than the Cayenne Turbo S and the RR of course. Curious on the overall driving characteristics though.
Old 09-05-2007, 12:44 PM
  #15  
Carrera 69
Advanced
 
Carrera 69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ELUSIVE
Because it's not ugly.
+2


Quick Reply: Any 2006 Range Rover Sport Supercharged owners out there?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:03 AM.