996 vs 928 buying advice
#77
I bought a '99 with 63k miles. Indy PPI said the clutch was ready for replacement.
So, I went ahead and did the IMS retrofit. Maybe unnecessary, but what the hell. You just have do decide what helps you sleep better at night. Besides whiskey and Ambien.
#78
This makes sense to me, kind of.
I bought a '99 with 63k miles. Indy PPI said the clutch was ready for replacement.
So, I went ahead and did the IMS retrofit. Maybe unnecessary, but what the hell. You just have do decide what helps you sleep better at night. Besides whiskey and Ambien.
I bought a '99 with 63k miles. Indy PPI said the clutch was ready for replacement.
So, I went ahead and did the IMS retrofit. Maybe unnecessary, but what the hell. You just have do decide what helps you sleep better at night. Besides whiskey and Ambien.
#79
With a base price in the mid-high 80's, and nicely equipped 996's originally selling for $100K and more, it's hard to VASTLY overpay...I paid $30K for my '99 C4- and while that was 4 years ago and the previous owner had dumped over $20K into upgrades, it's still a whole lot more than the $18-20K people seem to be spending these days.
If I could go back knowing what I know now about the car, I still would have bought it...it's been fantastically reliable and I have yet to see a 996.2, 997, or 991 that I would rather own. Sure, maybe a Turbo would have been nice from the power and "yay Mezger" perspectives, but there has not been a single day I have regretted the purchase.
I hope that - even though you paid more than you might have - you can still derive some enjoyment from your 996.
If I could go back knowing what I know now about the car, I still would have bought it...it's been fantastically reliable and I have yet to see a 996.2, 997, or 991 that I would rather own. Sure, maybe a Turbo would have been nice from the power and "yay Mezger" perspectives, but there has not been a single day I have regretted the purchase.
I hope that - even though you paid more than you might have - you can still derive some enjoyment from your 996.
#80
Only if I was buying a car I _knew_ I wanted to turbocharge would I consider an S2000 or a Miata; I don't think the Boxster is a terrific candidate for boost. I think the Z3 was a beautiful roadster, but a Boxster in seal grey with side skirts looks even better.
If you go the 986 route, buy an '03 or later. The glass window may not be a big deal for many folks, but a cloudy or cracked plastic window just looks crappy, especially on an otherwise beautiful car.
While I never, ever even want to contemplate getting rid of my 996 - I truly love this car - I wish I had not sold my 986. The 911 is superior in a number of ways, but you cannot recreate the feeling of powering the top back after a long work day with a sunroof.
I would gladly pay $2K more than I sold it for to get my old Boxster back - I miss it that much. Here's a photo of the one I stupidly let get away...
Last edited by 5CHN3LL; 06-20-2016 at 08:54 PM.
#82
This is probably one of THE best recommendations I have read on RL. I think that if a proper analysis were done, that 1-1.5% has probably already happen to all but a few 99s. There are defective bearings. Any car with even 40k miles would have failed by now. Some were probably from other factors (manufacturing tolerances, misaligned cases, etc.) those also would have happened by 40k. The only ones I think may still be out there are garage queens that sit for months or even years in old oil.
#83
The 986 Boxster is an amazing car. Sure, it has less HP than the 996, but the driving experience is incomparable. I'll get called out for exaggeration, but the Boxster was just...sublime.
If you go the 986 route, buy an '03 or later. The glass window may not be a big deal for many folks, but a cloudy or cracked plastic window just looks crappy, especially on an otherwise beautiful car.
If you go the 986 route, buy an '03 or later. The glass window may not be a big deal for many folks, but a cloudy or cracked plastic window just looks crappy, especially on an otherwise beautiful car.
#85
With a base price in the mid-high 80's, and nicely equipped 996's originally selling for $100K and more, it's hard to VASTLY overpay...I paid $30K for my '99 C4- and while that was 4 years ago and the previous owner had dumped over $20K into upgrades, it's still a whole lot more than the $18-20K people seem to be spending these days.
If I could go back knowing what I know now about the car, I still would have bought it...it's been fantastically reliable and I have yet to see a 996.2, 997, or 991 that I would rather own. Sure, maybe a Turbo would have been nice from the power and "yay Mezger" perspectives, but there has not been a single day I have regretted the purchase.
I hope that - even though you paid more than you might have - you can still derive some enjoyment from your 996.
If I could go back knowing what I know now about the car, I still would have bought it...it's been fantastically reliable and I have yet to see a 996.2, 997, or 991 that I would rather own. Sure, maybe a Turbo would have been nice from the power and "yay Mezger" perspectives, but there has not been a single day I have regretted the purchase.
I hope that - even though you paid more than you might have - you can still derive some enjoyment from your 996.
#86
Would I suggest that someone buying a 15k car spend 4k to fix something that has a 1-1.5% chance of failing? No. In fact my business sometimes takes me to used and new car dealerships and indies, I used to drive my 99 996 to them. All but one of them said, without even looking at the car, "you need to replace the IMSB right away". Guess which one got to service my car.