Notices
993 Forum 1995-1998
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Truth about 2S

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-11-2012, 01:51 AM
  #76  
Opo
Nordschleife Master
 
Opo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: katy texas
Posts: 5,027
Received 208 Likes on 76 Posts
Default :)


Last edited by Opo; 07-03-2014 at 01:20 AM.
Old 05-11-2012, 02:37 AM
  #77  
gonzilla
Rennlist Member
 
gonzilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
Posts: 3,995
Received 102 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 77'3.6vram
Was the 73' RS narrow-bodied? I do not think so.
No, you're right. Looks narrow compared to everything that came after it. That being said, the 964 RS retained the NB fenders, no?
Old 05-11-2012, 02:59 AM
  #78  
77'3.6vram
Banned
Thread Starter
 
77'3.6vram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default What's your point?

Originally Posted by gonzilla
No, you're right. Looks narrow compared to everything that came after it. That being said, the 964 RS retained the NB fenders, no?
That is my point.You are supporting my argument. Porsche believed putting a WB was only needed when there was a significant power increase(10% or more). Like the 964 RSR. Other than that the WB or turbo-look cars were only for posers( "The perfect Kings Road 911").
Old 05-11-2012, 03:39 AM
  #79  
gonzilla
Rennlist Member
 
gonzilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
Posts: 3,995
Received 102 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 77'3.6vram
That is my point.You are supporting my argument. Porsche believed putting a WB was only needed when there was a significant power increase(10% or more). Like the 964 RSR. Other than that the WB or turbo-look cars were only for posers( "The perfect Kings Road 911").
Wait. What's your argument again?
Old 05-11-2012, 05:54 AM
  #80  
Magdaddy
Rennlist Member
 
Magdaddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Oneida, New York
Posts: 4,942
Received 267 Likes on 198 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 77'3.6vram
That is my point.You are supporting my argument. Porsche believed putting a WB was only needed when there was a significant power increase(10% or more). Like the 964 RSR. Other than that the WB or turbo-look cars were only for posers( "The perfect Kings Road 911").
hi, my name is Joe...and I'm a poser.
Old 05-11-2012, 08:34 AM
  #81  
77'3.6vram
Banned
Thread Starter
 
77'3.6vram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by gonzilla
Wait. What's your argument again?
Again, The NB is the better more well balanced drivers car than the WB's.
Old 05-11-2012, 10:45 AM
  #82  
PecosBill
Rennlist Member
 
PecosBill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 266
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I don't understand the issue. Lovers of the C2S usually find that they are due to the aesthetic aspects of the car, I don't think I've ever heard anybody claim that the wide hips gave any performance advantage. The fact that they are less aerodynamic, and that the wider tires provide higher rolling resistance, is common knowledge, and has been since its introduction. If one doesn't find themselves attracted to the WB, they should count themselves lucky, it is like not being attracted to gorgeous women... saves you quite a bit of money. It all seems pretty moot to me though, because if you're looking for the highest performance car, the 993 isn't going to be your cup of tea anyway.

With any enthusiast vehicle, or even any other collectable item on the planet, there will be reasons to knock it. Most of the time people have the manners to keep their opinions to themselves, but every once in a while someone comes along that feels the need to **** in somebody else's bowl of Cheerios.
Old 05-11-2012, 10:57 AM
  #83  
inkatouring
Three Wheelin'
 
inkatouring's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: nowhere, but at least I'm getting there fast!
Posts: 1,382
Received 59 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PecosBill
I don't understand the issue.
That's because you going about it wrong -- you're applying logic to an argument on an Internet forum....
Old 05-11-2012, 12:37 PM
  #84  
boman993
Drifting
 
boman993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Toronto, ON Canada
Posts: 2,677
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PecosBill
I don't understand the issue. Lovers of the C2S usually find that they are due to the aesthetic aspects of the car, I don't think I've ever heard anybody claim that the wide hips gave any performance advantage. The fact that they are less aerodynamic, and that the wider tires provide higher rolling resistance, is common knowledge, and has been since its introduction. If one doesn't find themselves attracted to the WB, they should count themselves lucky, it is like not being attracted to gorgeous women... saves you quite a bit of money. It all seems pretty moot to me though, because if you're looking for the highest performance car, the 993 isn't going to be your cup of tea anyway.

With any enthusiast vehicle, or even any other collectable item on the planet, there will be reasons to knock it. Most of the time people have the manners to keep their opinions to themselves, but every once in a while someone comes along that feels the need to **** in somebody else's bowl of Cheerios.
THIS! ^^^^^^^
Old 05-11-2012, 12:43 PM
  #85  
77'3.6vram
Banned
Thread Starter
 
77'3.6vram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Let's start from the beginning! Some can't read!

Originally Posted by 77'3.6vram
I love all variants of the 993. I think it is time to remember what the seasoned professional Porsche writers/testers and owners had to say about the 2S before all the hype started.
All of the quotes are taken from GT Purely Porsche 2002 to 2005.

August 2004 issue:
"First,back in September 2002, we lambasted the S for it's hyper-active road manners,calling it the perfect King's Road 911."
"In February of this year we ran a 993 2S and 4S buyers guide.The author of that feature announced that the wide-bodied cars are not as good to drive as a standard Carrera 2. On the track or perfectly smooth blacktop you wouldn't complain, but when it came to driving the car every day on the UK's pitiful highways, it was certainly not handling as fluently as it should. He went on to say: Many owners
found they couldn't live with the S on a day-to-day basis and quickly
sold them. Our Pure Data section in the magazine, meanwhile ,
describes the 2S as a 'best avoided. The wide-boy 993 is, it would
appear , is something of a dichotomy- a flawed genius."

December 2005 issue:
"....in execution the Carrera S ,with it's two-wheel drive running gear, 17-inch wheels and standard brakes proved to be a bit of a disappointment. Admittedly it looked fantastic, those wide hips and a drop in ride height giving the S a menacing, ground-hugging appearance, but there was none of the finesse of the standard Carrera 2 about the car. Where the Carrera 2 glided over surface imperfections, the C2S crashed and thumped, hunting cambers and demanding frequent corrections. As an overall package this was the most compromised of the 993 range."

There are numerous other negative opinions given about the 2S. The
30 extra kilos reduced its performance and make it a difficult
machine to drive. There was and is justification for GT Purley Porsche
to have ,for seven years, given it a "Best Avoided" rating in there
Pure Data section.
The OP contained quotes from GT Purley Porsche. Colin Belton of NineMeister is quoted throughout the same articles.
Old 05-11-2012, 02:02 PM
  #86  
Mark in Baltimore
Rennlist Member
 
Mark in Baltimore's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 23,303
Received 499 Likes on 320 Posts
Default

....
Attached Images  
Old 05-11-2012, 02:18 PM
  #87  
Mike in Chi

Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Mike in Chi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The Flying Turtle Ranch
Posts: 12,321
Received 176 Likes on 112 Posts
Default

Mark

I was thinking maybe a couple of the regular 993 board trolls could be locked in a room together. Then thought better of the whole idea. While it would be amusing to watch at first, I fear it could end in a black hole into which the entire 993 board would disappear.
Old 05-11-2012, 02:36 PM
  #88  
Mike in Chi

Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Mike in Chi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The Flying Turtle Ranch
Posts: 12,321
Received 176 Likes on 112 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PecosBill
Most of the time people have the manners to keep their opinions to themselves, but every once in a while someone comes along that feels the need to **** in somebody else's bowl of Cheerios.
PecosBill
Old 05-11-2012, 02:37 PM
  #89  
Serge944
Rennlist Member
 
Serge944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: California
Posts: 8,022
Likes: 0
Received 55 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

Can we start a thread on how the 993 4S sucks...might give me some ammunition to haggle on the price.

Loosen up guys.
Old 05-11-2012, 02:44 PM
  #90  
Mike J
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Mike J's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 8,363
Received 71 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

I LOVE my wide-assed car - but I also have 400+HP to push her ***.

And the view from behind - !!

If I had less power - still stupendous!

Cheers,

Mike


Quick Reply: Truth about 2S



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:05 PM.