All this and for only $53,500.00 - COLLECTOR'S EDITION!!!!
10-27-2010, 03:11 PM
#124
Rennlist Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Paradise Valley, Arizona
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
This is a really terrific place and, to me at least, this thread hardly would give that impression to someone who just got here.
10-27-2010, 03:14 PM
#125
Race Director
Wow, if that truly is the seller she really is bat **** crazy. She is clearly easily insulted/offended.
At the start she was getting mean and nasty about people in their ebay msgs. calling her car a 993 and then in this diatribe she says she always thought it was a 993! I wonder how she found this 993 forum if no such car exists?
At the start she was getting mean and nasty about people in their ebay msgs. calling her car a 993 and then in this diatribe she says she always thought it was a 993! I wonder how she found this 993 forum if no such car exists?
10-27-2010, 03:17 PM
#126
Lets see here....
She's got many cars, but needs to sell the Porsche to pay for Grandma's funeral? If she had to deal with this nutty loon on any regular basis, I'd bet dollars to donuts that Grandma killed herself!
She's got many cars, but needs to sell the Porsche to pay for Grandma's funeral? If she had to deal with this nutty loon on any regular basis, I'd bet dollars to donuts that Grandma killed herself!
10-27-2010, 03:20 PM
#128
Rennlist Member
I agree that this is a great forum with many great people. I just am enjoying the humor thats all!
10-27-2010, 03:23 PM
#129
3rd Gear
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
DO YOU PEOPLE EVER READ???? READ POST # 116
How dare you speak that way about my Grandmother. How dare you?????????????????????? ... I'm not crazy by far and I'm personally sick of you people calling me names and treating me this way. I do not know any of you, nor do I want to but this is the seller and I'm just merely standing up for myself, and I see you're not taking me seriously, but I assure you -- you will when you get notification by mail or through Rennlist about your accounts here. If you don't like it then f*** off. You people came to my listing and treated me like crap just because of a "model issue" that I've explained. You attacked me, you people are the ones that came at me wrong and I'm dealing with a death in my family (DON'T YOU READ??? ... YOU ARE ALL LOSERS AND ********). I found this forum because one of your own sent the link to me and yet you stupid asses think you're doing something still thinking something is funny -- when one of your own contacted me at Ebay and gave me the link. I came here to let all of you know that I've contacted the legal department of Rennlist in CA and my attorney is dealing with them presently. I suggest you watch what you say from this point on because what you've done and are doing is a defamation of character and that's illegal. So if you don't like what I'm saying in this post, then go back and read my detailed one and maybe you'll get the point!! But please, when will you realize that it was you who sought me out, I never asked any of you to come to my listing. You came to me so please save your B.S. I'm sick of you people! Good-bye!
10-27-2010, 03:27 PM
#131
Rennlist Member
Only the crazies feel the need to post in larger bold fonts, the rest of us are confident our words are worthy enough to be read without the need to yell at people.
GET IT, CRAZY?
PS I'm Canadian, your lawyer will tell you not to waste your time trying to reclaim my canuck-bucks
GET IT, CRAZY?
PS I'm Canadian, your lawyer will tell you not to waste your time trying to reclaim my canuck-bucks
10-27-2010, 03:33 PM
#134
Whoever ratted us to Princess Trainwreck, I salute you. 
I look forward to seeing this crazy mess on "Desperate Housewives Of Deer Park" next year.
I feel confident that this is The Best Thread Of The Year.
I look forward to seeing this crazy mess on "Desperate Housewives Of Deer Park" next year.I feel confident that this is The Best Thread Of The Year.
10-27-2010, 03:54 PM
#135
I'm no lawyer, but I did stay at a Holiday Inn last night.
The First Amendment protects statements of opinion, as distinct from statements of fact, against claims of defamation. However, the test is not the author's mere characterization of the statement as "opinion." Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co., 497 U.S. 1 (1990). A statement is an opinion when:
(1) the statement addresses matters of public concern;
(2) the statement expressed in a manner that is not provably true or false; and
(3) the statement cannot be reasonably interpreted as intended to convey actual facts about a person.
Id. at 17.
In addition, the U.S. Supreme Court articulated some standards to assist in determining whether a statement is intended to convey an actual fact about a person, or not:
(1) is the language loose, figurative, or hyperbolic, which would negate the impression that the speaker was seriously maintaining the truth of the underlying facts?
(2) Does the general tenor of the article negate the impression that the speaker was seriously maintaining the truth of the underlying fact? and
(3) is the connotation sufficiently factual to be susceptible of being proved true or false.
However,
“I hope you all burn in hell and I could care less what you say to this post because if you were all here in the State of New York I would slap the living **** out of each one of you ***** assed men, or women whichever or beat your StrekStrekStrekStreking asses for posting this crap this way.”
18 U.S.C. § 875(c) states: "Whoever transmits in interstate or foreign commerce any communication containing any threat to kidnap any person or any threat to injure the person of another, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both."
(1) the statement addresses matters of public concern;
(2) the statement expressed in a manner that is not provably true or false; and
(3) the statement cannot be reasonably interpreted as intended to convey actual facts about a person.
Id. at 17.
In addition, the U.S. Supreme Court articulated some standards to assist in determining whether a statement is intended to convey an actual fact about a person, or not:
(1) is the language loose, figurative, or hyperbolic, which would negate the impression that the speaker was seriously maintaining the truth of the underlying facts?
(2) Does the general tenor of the article negate the impression that the speaker was seriously maintaining the truth of the underlying fact? and
(3) is the connotation sufficiently factual to be susceptible of being proved true or false.
However,
“I hope you all burn in hell and I could care less what you say to this post because if you were all here in the State of New York I would slap the living **** out of each one of you ***** assed men, or women whichever or beat your StrekStrekStrekStreking asses for posting this crap this way.”
18 U.S.C. § 875(c) states: "Whoever transmits in interstate or foreign commerce any communication containing any threat to kidnap any person or any threat to injure the person of another, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both."