Notices
993 Forum 1995-1998
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

993SR rear suspension

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-05-2008, 08:30 AM
  #16  
Bill Verburg
Addict
Rennlist Member

Thread Starter
 
Bill Verburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 12,384
Received 574 Likes on 395 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TheOtherEric
Bill - are you going to investigate the rubber in the bushings by chance? I know you were curious about what rubber they use in the RS parts and how that compares to the stock bushings.
As far as I can see the #s on both RS and regular bushes are the same, they are TRW sourced.

The rubber RS parts have green dots and the aluminum RS parts have blue dots on them(you can see the blue dots on the RS A arms above)
Old 12-05-2008, 08:32 AM
  #17  
Bill Verburg
Addict
Rennlist Member

Thread Starter
 
Bill Verburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 12,384
Received 574 Likes on 395 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Noah
Just curious, but what is the general service life of the rubber bushings in the stock parts? Is this something we should be worrying about as we put the miles on our cars? (Mine is about to hit 100K.)
Thats a ood question, it will be interesting to see how worn the parts are upon removal.

The toe links on mine were shot at 85000mi.
Old 12-05-2008, 11:27 AM
  #18  
TheOtherEric
Rennlist Member
 
TheOtherEric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 12,065
Received 36 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Verburg
As far as I can see the #s on both RS and regular bushes are the same, they are TRW sourced.

The rubber RS parts have green dots and the aluminum RS parts have blue dots on them(you can see the blue dots on the RS A arms above)
So the only reason to replace your parts with RS parts is for the weight reduction and greater strength? Just trying to understand this.
Old 12-05-2008, 03:08 PM
  #19  
Akerlie
Burning Brakes
 
Akerlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Norway/Iceland
Posts: 776
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by TheOtherEric
So the only reason to replace your parts with RS parts is for the weight reduction and greater strength? Just trying to understand this.
Weight and strength would be reasons good enough for me
Old 12-05-2008, 03:51 PM
  #20  
Bill Verburg
Addict
Rennlist Member

Thread Starter
 
Bill Verburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 12,384
Received 574 Likes on 395 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TheOtherEric
So the only reason to replace your parts with RS parts is for the weight reduction and greater strength? Just trying to understand this.
Not at all, the green dot bushings are stiffer, the RS specific arms are the A arm and the castor arm(top rear arm). I strongly suspect that the castings are the same for both RS and normal.

here's the RS A - arm casting #


I'll compare to the '95s arms when they are off the car, it will also be interesting to compare to any later arm #s. If you have them please do post them.

The RS eccentrics are also different allowing a greater range of adjustment.
Old 12-05-2008, 03:54 PM
  #21  
TheOtherEric
Rennlist Member
 
TheOtherEric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 12,065
Received 36 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Akerlie
Weight and strength would be reasons good enough for me
Lol, so the cost is irrelevant? I'll be contacting you next time I have some parts for sale.
Old 12-06-2008, 03:19 PM
  #22  
JoeMag
Rennlist Member
 
JoeMag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 1,304
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Here's pic of right A-arm from my car. ...I really have no idea what it is, but webbing looks same as Bill's new parts and casting number is the same. Couldn't tell by bushings because my car has monoballs in all joints.

would be interesting for someone to post known stock pic for comparison.
Attached Images   
Old 12-06-2008, 03:42 PM
  #23  
Hank Cohn
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Hank Cohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 839
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

I did the same project Bill is currently engaged in several years ago. I also bought the RS side member pieces which are the parts that most of this stuff bolts to. The side members allow for more camber in the rear than the stock pieces do. These were about $800-$1000 each, 6 years ago. If you’ve already done the front RS uprights, RS toe links and lower A-arms then this will complete the package. If you just do the front of the car then the rear feels very sloppy and lags behind during changes in direction.

I no longer own a 993 but if I were building a track car then the monoball cartridges would be the route I would go. They really don’t add that much NVH to the car and are very superior at maintaining alignment settings.

That said, Bill is in the midst of a great upgrade and for a dual purpose car it will be perfect not including the price! I drove mine on the street and track for about 20,000 miles with the RS pieces before I sold my RS Replica and it was extremely durable during that time. The car is still around, and from what I hear, still doing well.

Hank
Old 12-06-2008, 03:54 PM
  #24  
Bill Verburg
Addict
Rennlist Member

Thread Starter
 
Bill Verburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 12,384
Received 574 Likes on 395 Posts
Default

Hanks Thanks for the encouragement, the chassis dynamic you described is exactly what i experienced this summer, front was done last year w/ RS upright etc.

the last bit of this appears to be the sidepanels, it just seems to be a tremendous amount of extra work to get solid mounts on them. Currently I can get _2.5 to _ 3.xx of camber w/ the stock side pieces. That seems to be enough.
Old 12-06-2008, 04:04 PM
  #25  
Hank Cohn
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Hank Cohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 839
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Bill,

I should have said that the side members were a waste of money and effort. You are right. There is plenty of camber stroke in the stock pieces as long as you stay on DOT rubber. If you were going to run slicks then you might consider it. For me, it was one of those “While you’re in there” decisions that later became a regretted expenditure.

Good luck with your project. Once the car is all RS Spec, and it looks like you are really really close, you’re going to be very happy. The trick will be to stop modifying at that point.

Hank
Old 12-06-2008, 05:26 PM
  #26  
MB965
Rennlist Member
 
MB965's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 429
Received 63 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

Bill,

I concluded the same, the RS side members were not worth the price (>$2000) just to get the harder rubber and greater camber range. If you really needed to you could just enlarge the camber slot, although like you I had plenty of adjustment range with the stock side members. I am still looking at working up a way of being able to remove the rubber bushings with the side members on the car.
I want to use your car to try it on! I have worked up some preliminary drawings of the "tool" for doing this. Did you say you have access to lathe?

Also the casting numbers and appearance of my original rear links and control arms were the same as the new RS (and new standard) links and control arms. I do not think there are any differences except the bushings. Even the bushing main part numbers were the same with the difference only being in the suffix numbers. The RS bushings were harder than the originals though.

Mike
Old 12-06-2008, 08:10 PM
  #27  
Bill Verburg
Addict
Rennlist Member

Thread Starter
 
Bill Verburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 12,384
Received 574 Likes on 395 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MB965
Bill,

I concluded the same, the RS side members were not worth the price (>$2000) just to get the harder rubber and greater camber range. If you really needed to you could just enlarge the camber slot, although like you I had plenty of adjustment range with the stock side members. I am still looking at working up a way of being able to remove the rubber bushings with the side members on the car.
I want to use your car to try it on! I have worked up some preliminary drawings of the "tool" for doing this. Did you say you have access to lathe?

Also the casting numbers and appearance of my original rear links and control arms were the same as the new RS (and new standard) links and control arms. I do not think there are any differences except the bushings. Even the bushing main part numbers were the same with the difference only being in the suffix numbers. The RS bushings were harder than the originals though.

Mike
Thanks Mike, yes, I have access to a fair shop down at the Port
Old 12-07-2008, 01:53 PM
  #28  
Stealth 993
Nordschleife Master
 
Stealth 993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 5,477
Received 208 Likes on 126 Posts
Default

Can you please do some side by sides? I'd love to see if all the angles are the same.
Also please weigh both the stock & RSR, I'd love to see how much they differ. I'm on the fence about getting some adjustable arms VS stock race parts.
Old 12-29-2008, 05:42 PM
  #29  
AOW162435
Seared
Rennlist Member
 
AOW162435's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Posts: 16,777
Received 418 Likes on 233 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AC993C2S
And Andreas - I can send you some 3.6 P/Cs to have a go at some "modern art" by the way. ;-)
I just wanted to give a huge thanks to Rob for actually doing this - the Brown Santa stopped by today with a wonderful selection of pistons, cylinders, rods & cams! Very, very cool!


Andreas
Old 12-29-2008, 05:54 PM
  #30  
FLA997
Drifting
 
FLA997's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: FT. LAUDERDALE, FL
Posts: 2,797
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Your very welcome Andreas!

And Bill- your set is on the way also.


Quick Reply: 993SR rear suspension



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:16 AM.