Notices
993 Forum 1995-1998
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

OT:Five Killed In A 2008 BMW M5

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-29-2008, 12:47 AM
  #76  
csertich
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
csertich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Germantown, TN
Posts: 3,087
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I was 18 in 1968. A car FREAK from age 4. Had a stock car dirt track a half mile from my house. All my friends were car guys. There were affluent kids we went to school with whose parents bought them big engine corvettes, 396 Camaros, GTO's, Chevelles, Roadrunners, you know. As one should have been able to predict, putting those weapons in the hands of those kids had horrific results in isolated cases.
But we keep doing it over and over again.....

I'm very sorry to hear of this loss. Those who survive these deaths are in my thoughts and prayers. I'm so sorry for the families involved. Please get through this as best you can.

chuck


.
Old 01-29-2008, 02:00 AM
  #77  
Leander
Rennlist Member
 
Leander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Long Beach , CA
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Black993
not sure if it was covered already, but local news is saying now they were "not alone" at the time of the accident. Details to come around 11.


This is fox news local, so take it for what its worth

"Fox News." Those two words don't go together...
Old 01-29-2008, 05:29 AM
  #78  
Toga
Three Wheelin'
 
Toga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Belgium
Posts: 1,547
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Marv
Maybe the answer is how far ahead you can see with your headlights.
As there was a negative difference in height at the end of the runway, I would guess they were just seing a black hole with no obstacle in front of them.The trees are probably below the "horizon" when sitting on the Runway. The best would have been to take some references on the runway markings. It appear, looking on the sat pictures, that starting to brake hard at the Rwy threshold and using the area after that displaced threshold to stop would have been a good start as it looks to be approximatively one third of the Rwy length...But I'm sure we, adults, all know that! But who told them?
Old 01-29-2008, 09:31 AM
  #79  
Woody
Racer
 
Woody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Central Floridan
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That diagram of the runway a few pages back is a bit misleading. The subdivision is an airport community and many people there have airplanes and fly. The high area at the end of the runway is a tall pile of dirt built into a crescent shaped blast shield. It protects the road and traffic at the end of the runway from the jet blast when the big jet at the airport runs up.

I do not know how fast they were going before striking the blast shield, but between seeing the obstruction (braking?) and then hitting the hill, they had to have lost a lot of speed before going airborne. And they still went a long ways airborne before the tree and ripping the car in half. It seems to me the math giving a 68 mph take off speed fails to take into account the energy needed to tear this car in half when it meets the tree.

Does really fast count as a guess for how fast they were going?
Old 01-29-2008, 09:36 AM
  #80  
cabrio993
Race Car
 
cabrio993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Johns Creek, GA
Posts: 4,682
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Woody
That diagram of the runway a few pages back is a bit misleading. The subdivision is an airport community and many people there have airplanes and fly. The high area at the end of the runway is a tall pile of dirt built into a crescent shaped blast shield. It protects the road and traffic at the end of the runway from the jet blast when the big jet at the airport runs up.

I do not know how fast they were going before striking the blast shield, but between seeing the obstruction (braking?) and then hitting the hill, they had to have lost a lot of speed before going airborne. And they still went a long ways airborne before the tree and ripping the car in half. It seems to me the math giving a 68 mph take off speed fails to take into account the energy needed to tear this car in half when it meets the tree.

Does really fast count as a guess for how fast they were going?
Also, I read on the intitial reports, that the skidmarks are not stratight but rather as if he tried to turn away from the dead end as he was breaking.

If this is correct, this means that the car could have gotten airbone sideways, flipping in mid air and meeting the tree roof first. This could explain the car breaking in half.

It would take less force to break the car in half once the roof has collapsed in and all is left is the floor structure.

Regardless of how the hit the tree, I also believe that the speed of impact had to be way more than the calculated 68mph.
Old 01-29-2008, 11:57 AM
  #81  
TRINITONY
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
TRINITONY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: I should be in TNT for Carnival!
Posts: 10,195
Received 311 Likes on 252 Posts
Default

Court records: Driver had received four tickets in past two years


STAR-BANNER
OCALA - Joshua Ammirato, the young man who was behind the wheel of a powerful BMW that sailed off the end of the Greystone Airport runway early Saturday and into a tree, had been ticketed four times in less than two years, court records show.

The last ticket that Ammirato, 18, received was on Jan. 23, just a couple of days before he and four other young men died in the fiery crash. The offense: violation of traffic control device.

Ammirato was first ticketed on March 15, 2006, when law officers said he was driving between 20 and 29 mph over the speed limit. He pleaded guilty and paid a $208.50 fine, the records showed.

In June 2006, Ammirato was stopped again. This time he received a ticket for driving between 1 and 9 mph over the speed limit and for driving with a suspended license. He paid a fine and received a driving curfew, the court records showed.

Florida Highway Patrol investigators believe Ammirato's BMW M5 was traveling at a high rate of speed down the airport runway sometime after 3:30 a.m. Saturday when it went off the end and flew some 200 feet into a tree, where it split in two on impact.

Ammirato died, along with Jacon James Casey, 19; James Devon Hime, 19; Dustin J. Dawe, 19; and Isaac Rubin 20.

Stay tuned to ocala.com for more details throughout the day.
__________________
Old 01-29-2008, 01:02 PM
  #82  
Arrwin
Rennlist Member
 
Arrwin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 3,256
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Kinda eerie...but I was just reading this post on the M5 Board (http://www.m5board.com/vbulletin/sho...d.php?t=111454) where people were skeptical about him being a 18 year old and wise/responsible enough to be driving/own a 500hp car. Many warned him and cared for his well-being. The comment of one member was pretty eerily foreshadowing...

"My only bit of advice matey - If you crash in a big way expect to be on the news."

Here's an article about him consulting the M5 board hours before the accident...

http://www.ocala.com/article/2008012...rtwithcomments
Old 01-29-2008, 01:56 PM
  #83  
Marv
Rennlist Member
 
Marv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Florida Space Coast
Posts: 4,228
Received 1,071 Likes on 572 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Woody
That diagram of the runway a few pages back is a bit misleading. The subdivision is an airport community and many people there have airplanes and fly. The high area at the end of the runway is a tall pile of dirt built into a crescent shaped blast shield. It protects the road and traffic at the end of the runway from the jet blast when the big jet at the airport runs up.

I do not know how fast they were going before striking the blast shield, but between seeing the obstruction (braking?) and then hitting the hill, they had to have lost a lot of speed before going airborne. And they still went a long ways airborne before the tree and ripping the car in half. It seems to me the math giving a 68 mph take off speed fails to take into account the energy needed to tear this car in half when it meets the tree.

Does really fast count as a guess for how fast they were going?
If the runway is flat until the end and the car only moves at speed horizontally, then the only vertical component to the car's path will be due to gravity (9.8 m/s^2). It is simple math to calculate the amount of time an object drops 65 feet (the delta between the distance to the ground minus the height at which it struck the tree).

I can't vouch that the data the report provided is accurate, but given that data, 68 mph is the right number. The math is good, but what the real distances are is another matter.
Old 01-29-2008, 02:42 PM
  #84  
Leander
Rennlist Member
 
Leander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Long Beach , CA
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Marv
If the runway is flat until the end and the car only moves at speed horizontally, then the only vertical component to the car's path will be due to gravity (9.8 m/s^2). It is simple math to calculate the amount of time an object drops 65 feet (the delta between the distance to the ground minus the height at which it struck the tree).

I can't vouch that the data the report provided is accurate, but given that data, 68 mph is the right number. The math is good, but what the real distances are is another matter.

But he could have been going sideways at 68 mph, after having skidded-out from braking at high speed.
Old 01-29-2008, 06:06 PM
  #85  
RSRee
Advanced
 
RSRee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: West Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Such sad, sad story - a clear case of having more money (the kid's parents) than brains.

A clear case of Darwin at work ...
Old 01-29-2008, 06:32 PM
  #86  
vjd3
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
vjd3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Boston
Posts: 3,104
Received 16 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

What's even worse is some guy on the M5 board posted this thread :

*******

http://www.m5board.com/vbulletin/sho...d.php?t=110841

I am in the beginning planning stage w/ another member to investigate what airstrips are available in So. FL. to do 30 to 150 mph run offs just like Gustav did on the airfield.
This will be a great opportunity to run our cars w/o getting in trouble.

I need to get a feel of who would be interested to make this happen. It would be open to other sports cars to get more people to compete.

There is an 11,000 ft. runway in consideration. That's more than enough to go 190 or 200 mph and slow down.

My goal would be to have these events every 3 months depending on the interest, but who wouldn't want to run their car ***** out.

Please respond if you're interested.

Thank you all,
M5Ranger...Juan

********

And on the last day of his life, the kid (AmericanM5) posted "I'm in."

Wonder where he got the idea to put the car on a private airstrip that night?
Old 01-29-2008, 06:45 PM
  #87  
lucycan
Rennlist Member
 
lucycan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,451
Received 480 Likes on 228 Posts
Default

Wow!
Old 01-29-2008, 07:07 PM
  #88  
Marlon
Drifting
 
Marlon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Fairfax Virginia
Posts: 2,373
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

They were obviously travelling in excess of 100 mph when the car left the ground.

Originally Posted by Woody
That diagram of the runway a few pages back is a bit misleading. The subdivision is an airport community and many people there have airplanes and fly. The high area at the end of the runway is a tall pile of dirt built into a crescent shaped blast shield. It protects the road and traffic at the end of the runway from the jet blast when the big jet at the airport runs up.

I do not know how fast they were going before striking the blast shield, but between seeing the obstruction (braking?) and then hitting the hill, they had to have lost a lot of speed before going airborne. And they still went a long ways airborne before the tree and ripping the car in half. It seems to me the math giving a 68 mph take off speed fails to take into account the energy needed to tear this car in half when it meets the tree.

Does really fast count as a guess for how fast they were going?
Old 01-29-2008, 07:44 PM
  #89  
Marv
Rennlist Member
 
Marv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Florida Space Coast
Posts: 4,228
Received 1,071 Likes on 572 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Marlon
They were obviously travelling in excess of 100 mph when the car left the ground.
How did you arrive at that at that number? You may be right, but I didn't see the obvious, I guess.
Old 01-29-2008, 07:53 PM
  #90  
Marv
Rennlist Member
 
Marv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Florida Space Coast
Posts: 4,228
Received 1,071 Likes on 572 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Leander
But he could have been going sideways at 68 mph, after having skidded-out from braking at high speed.
I think that there was evidence cited that the car was tracking sideways (skid marks), so you are probably right.

Regardless of which orientation that car had when it left the runway, if the final velocity really was 68 mph, the trajectory would be about the same. What a horrible fate.


Quick Reply: OT:Five Killed In A 2008 BMW M5



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:14 PM.