Notices
992 2019-Present The Forum for the Non-Turbo 911
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

992 Base Carrera Build (Flat 6 Motorsports)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-06-2022, 01:14 PM
  #31  
Flat6Motorsports
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

Thread Starter
 
Flat6Motorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 583
Received 797 Likes on 271 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cst
We know theres alot of power potential in the base engine ..but...
What about suspension and handling? I cant imagine throwing some lowering springs on a base will match a T with the SPASM, torque vectoring and limited slip even if one was not to opt for rear axle steering on a T.

Im anxiously waiting for your results with the Bilstein coilovers. interested to see if those will pick up the deficit the base has over a SPASM c2S .
M-engineering did mention somewhere about programming an e-,limited slip as a potential idea....

Either way.....keep up the good work!
We'll have a lot of impressions and data. I'm interested to see how the car behaves with more power as we go with larger turbochargers particularly on corner exit. The 992 base PASM with the stock ride height produced a bit of body roll and pitch making it feel a tad soft to me. I had the opportunity to run my 992 and 996 Carrera back to back on the track. My 996 has all new everything suspension, Ohlins R&T coilovers, Eibach sway bars, and Tarett adjustable end-links with a proper alignment (riding on Michelin P4S it also has a built 3.8L engine). The 992 was significantly faster, even in cornering speeds.

I haven't had the H&R setup on track yet but we have a small handling circuit we use by the shop to get a quick feel. The turn in is a lot better and the car sets a lot quicker. I noticed a little more oversteer but the tires weren't fully warm so that could have been a factor. I really need to get it out on the track to get real data but the car feels more direct. It seems like the base PASM works fine with the H&R springs. The ride height is perfect for me as well. I'm not a huge fan of the PTV on the 991.2 Carrera T (with PDK). I can feel the differential/vectoring processing real time. I suspect a PTV car will do better on the track with lap times as even on stock power, there are areas where the traction wanted to kick in a little (with PSM off).

In terms of needs, we've been doing this for a while with Carreras and Turbos. Porsche makes a great car that is capable of handling much more power than they provide stock. I don't see any major deficiencies in the platform with more power. It would only rear it's head on track when you are trying to put it down on slower/tighter corner exits. We just did a 991.2 Carrera (base) with GTS turbos, full bolt-ons, tuning, etc. that made about 525whp (~600HP crank) and that didn't have any issues on the street. A very fun car! We love the value of the modern Carreras.
__________________
Flat 6 Motorsports
Porsche Aftermarket Specialists
www.flat6motorsports.com
Instagram / Facebook / YouTube
The following users liked this post:
timjab (12-09-2022)
Old 12-06-2022, 01:18 PM
  #32  
Pc997
Intermediate
 
Pc997's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 30
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Flat6Motorsports
A few shots from our day testing at the FIRM in Starke/Keystone Heights, FL.





Is this Base 992 with brake upgrade?
Old 12-06-2022, 01:23 PM
  #33  
Flat6Motorsports
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

Thread Starter
 
Flat6Motorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 583
Received 797 Likes on 271 Posts
Smile

Originally Posted by Pc997
Is this Base 992 with brake upgrade?
No, the previous owner had the calipers painted. We will be doing a brake upgrade later this week if I can fit it in!
The following users liked this post:
mattchow (12-06-2022)
Old 12-06-2022, 01:37 PM
  #34  
Pc997
Intermediate
 
Pc997's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 30
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Flat6Motorsports
No, the previous owner had the calipers painted. We will be doing a brake upgrade later this week if I can fit it in!
Thanks. Curious on the brake upgrade..
Old 12-06-2022, 01:56 PM
  #35  
Mike Murphy
Rennlist Member
 
Mike Murphy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 8,883
Received 1,701 Likes on 1,053 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Flat6Motorsports;[url=tel:18501486
18501486[/url]]We have that written backwards but the data points are the same. Max should be the essentially the largest gain between the two runs, meaning you're making 101whp over stock at a certain RPM. The peak number is the highest overall number, so the top number is up 48whp over stock. The same applies to torque gains, one is the largest delta or increase and one is the largest absolute gain.

It seems Porsche underrates the base power. At the crankshaft, stock it makes roughly 430HP. With the M-Engineering tune it has 485HP at the crank. So basically just software gives you GTS power.

It's important to analyze the area under the curve both in HP and TQ. You can see the darker regions showing the gains.

Horsepower (WHP):
Once you are into the throttle and boost ramps, the power is quite obvious. It holds strong until about 6.5K rpms with huge gains over stock. This is common with turbocharged vehicles as increases to boost pressure can add torque/power pretty instantly. Up top the gains are not as dramatic because of the airflow restrictions in the stock intake/exhaust and the turbo geometry. To make more power up top, we'll need to increase airflow and reduce restriction. We'll do that through some bolt-ons and custom tuning here shortly. We'll also be doing the S/GTS (and Pure) turbochargers as well along in the build so will be able to compare the effect of turbo sizing.

Torque (FT-LBS):
Here you can also see the massive increase to torque delivery which is what is making the power. This is a massive area under the curve! This is important because this is essentially a graph of "real world" feel. You're going to feel that huge increase in torque every time you push into the throttle. Most 992s will live in the 3-5K RPM range running around town and even having a little fun/joy with the car.
While area under the curve is impressive here, I wonder if smoothing out that massive torque bump at 3500 would have any effect on how the car feels? I’m sure it would slow the car down a tad, but maybe the car would feel more consistent? I don’t know. I’m not complaining, just wanting to understand. My old R53 mini coolper S has a peak between 3000-3800 that could be felt.

All in all, looks awesome!
Old 12-06-2022, 08:05 PM
  #36  
mattchow
Rennlist Member
 
mattchow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 653
Received 389 Likes on 209 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Flat6Motorsports
Yes, it actually makes it easier, you just remove the clock and replace it with out mount and banks gauge.
I meant more along the lines that I wanted to keep my SC and add the banks gauge somewhere in the car.
Old 12-06-2022, 08:09 PM
  #37  
mattchow
Rennlist Member
 
mattchow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 653
Received 389 Likes on 209 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Flat6Motorsports
We'll have a lot of impressions and data. I'm interested to see how the car behaves with more power as we go with larger turbochargers particularly on corner exit. The 992 base PASM with the stock ride height produced a bit of body roll and pitch making it feel a tad soft to me. I had the opportunity to run my 992 and 996 Carrera back to back on the track. My 996 has all new everything suspension, Ohlins R&T coilovers, Eibach sway bars, and Tarett adjustable end-links with a proper alignment (riding on Michelin P4S it also has a built 3.8L engine). The 992 was significantly faster, even in cornering speeds.

I haven't had the H&R setup on track yet but we have a small handling circuit we use by the shop to get a quick feel. The turn in is a lot better and the car sets a lot quicker. I noticed a little more oversteer but the tires weren't fully warm so that could have been a factor. I really need to get it out on the track to get real data but the car feels more direct. It seems like the base PASM works fine with the H&R springs. The ride height is perfect for me as well. I'm not a huge fan of the PTV on the 991.2 Carrera T (with PDK). I can feel the differential/vectoring processing real time. I suspect a PTV car will do better on the track with lap times as even on stock power, there are areas where the traction wanted to kick in a little (with PSM off).

In terms of needs, we've been doing this for a while with Carreras and Turbos. Porsche makes a great car that is capable of handling much more power than they provide stock. I don't see any major deficiencies in the platform with more power. It would only rear it's head on track when you are trying to put it down on slower/tighter corner exits. We just did a 991.2 Carrera (base) with GTS turbos, full bolt-ons, tuning, etc. that made about 525whp (~600HP crank) and that didn't have any issues on the street. A very fun car! We love the value of the modern Carreras.
how much were the GTS turbos? no one has really presented options other than the pure turbo upgrades from m engineering. the m engineering do the tune for the GTS turbos?
Old 12-07-2022, 01:06 AM
  #38  
ipse dixit
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
ipse dixit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 16,848
Likes: 0
Received 11,524 Likes on 5,053 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Flat6Motorsports
Hey all, this is Jon from Flat 6 Motorsports. We recently picked up a 992 Carrera that we've done and will be doing a lot of testing and development on. I thought I'd start a thread to share some updates as we have data/testing results and pictures, info and insights.

We'll be testing about 15 different exhaust combinations, tuning, suspension, intercoolers, turbos, water/meth, etc.

Just a quick running list of parts/solutions we'll be testing:
  • M-Engineering ECU Tune
  • M-Engineering PDK Tune
  • Flat 6 Banks Chrono + Kit
  • Flat 6 Wheel Spacer Kit
  • OEM S/GTS Turbos
  • CSF Intercooler
  • H&R Lowering Springs
  • Bilstein EVO Coilovers
  • Exhausts from Soul, Kline, Akrapovic, iPE, Link Pipes w/ PSE
  • Flat 6 LED Side Markers
  • Flat 6 Water/Meth Injection Kit
  • AWE Foilers
  • OEM PCCB Calipers w/ Girodisc 2-Peice Steel Rotors (410mm/390mm)
  • Do88 Inlets/Hoses
  • BC Forged RZ05 Wheels / Michelin Cup 2 Tires
  • Pure Turbos
You should take the car in for a warranty claim and sell tickets.

I bet you'd probably make as much money as you would selling the mods.
Old 12-07-2022, 09:18 AM
  #39  
Flat6Motorsports
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

Thread Starter
 
Flat6Motorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 583
Received 797 Likes on 271 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Pc997
Thanks. Curious on the brake upgrade..
I'll have a post later today discussing it and pictures later this week. We had to wait on 2 more bolts that come today from Porsche.

Originally Posted by mattchow
I meant more along the lines that I wanted to keep my SC and add the banks gauge somewhere in the car.
Ahh, it comes with a universal mounting clamp. I'm not sure a good place to mount it without it looking sort of out of place but you could probably stick it near the a-pillar.

Originally Posted by mattchow
how much were the GTS turbos? no one has really presented options other than the pure turbo upgrades from m engineering. the m engineering do the tune for the GTS turbos?
We're working on offering a kit. I don't have finalized pricing yet but we're hoping to come in around the 991.2 upgrade kit we offer. We'll probably offer just the turbos but also working on a kit that includes turbos, all the OEM gaskets, seals, o-rings, and tuning from M-Engineering.

Originally Posted by ipse dixit
You should take the car in for a warranty claim and sell tickets.
I bet you'd probably make as much money as you would selling the mods.
We're not concerned about warranty. We've been pushing the 3.0L over 700HP for 4-5 years now without any issues. The 9A2/9A2 EVO motors are very stout and impressive. A lot of shared parts with the new Turbo motor.
The following users liked this post:
tourenwagen (12-09-2022)
Old 12-07-2022, 09:27 AM
  #40  
Flat6Motorsports
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

Thread Starter
 
Flat6Motorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 583
Received 797 Likes on 271 Posts
Default

I just wanted to share some updates/photos after doing a few aesthetic modifications. I thought the base 992 Carrera looked a little too soft and too upright in the front. I wanted a lower/more aggressive look and just clean up the overall color palette with the car.

Here’s what we swapped out:I really love the look and the lower center of gravity. You feel a little more road coming through the slightly stiffer spring rate but it’s still comfortable and turn-in on the car is dramatically improved. I’m excited to get this on the track to feel the difference at the limit. It looks a lot more aggressive now, to me it feels more special. All of the lighting and OEM parts were simple to install. The side markers don’t even require any tools to swap!

Up next, we have a fun project. I purchased the car with 6K miles on it from a dealership. The previous owner had the calipers repainted in yellow. It’s a bit brighter of a yellow than Porsche uses on the PCCB calipers but unfortunately, whoever did the work…they put the Porsche logos on upside down on the driver’s side! The brakes held up well at the track with Motul RBF 600 (all else stock) but since I need to fix the caliper issue (and I like Big Brakes, I cannot lie), so we’re doing a PCCB conversion. We’ll be using the OEM PCCB calipers for the 992 (shared with the 991.2 Carrera or Turbo) and I’ll be pairing them with stainless steel brake lines from Goodridge, Ferodo DS2500 pads and Girodisc 2-Piece rotors. This will really fill out the wheels and make the car look even more aggressive. It will also enhance braking performance with a larger surface area and improved pad compound. More details, weights, impressions, and pics to follow!







The following 8 users liked this post by Flat6Motorsports:
3RsInCarrera (12-07-2022), boilermaker_yv (12-16-2023), mattchow (12-07-2022), OnPole (12-13-2022), SamD (12-18-2022), surquhar (12-08-2022), tmslc (02-26-2023), tourenwagen (12-09-2022) and 3 others liked this post. (Show less...)
Old 12-08-2022, 06:50 PM
  #41  
reddsektor
Pro
 
reddsektor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Dallas
Posts: 619
Received 508 Likes on 261 Posts
Default

I can't wait for your exhaust comparisons between Akra, Soul, and Kline for sound and performance. I have catless downpipes + PSE on my C2S but looking at akra or soul exhaust soon for an even more pronounced tone.

Last edited by reddsektor; 12-08-2022 at 06:52 PM.
The following 3 users liked this post by reddsektor:
911Gr8tness (12-09-2022), Flat6Motorsports (12-08-2022), mattchow (12-09-2022)
Old 12-09-2022, 12:10 AM
  #42  
mattchow
Rennlist Member
 
mattchow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 653
Received 389 Likes on 209 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by reddsektor
I can't wait for your exhaust comparisons between Akra, Soul, and Kline for sound and performance. I have catless downpipes + PSE on my C2S but looking at akra or soul exhaust soon for an even more pronounced tone.
we just need to meet at some point lol.
The following 2 users liked this post by mattchow:
Chris Connor (07-14-2023), reddsektor (12-09-2022)
Old 12-09-2022, 09:40 AM
  #43  
Stoney901
Instructor
 
Stoney901's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Posts: 177
Received 160 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

Subscribed.

@Flat6Motorsports May be interested in the old calipers if you decide to sell them.
The following users liked this post:
Flat6Motorsports (12-13-2022)
Old 12-09-2022, 09:58 AM
  #44  
PHX
Burning Brakes
 
PHX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Naples, FL
Posts: 1,089
Received 664 Likes on 431 Posts
Default

Excellent work and to me, awesome improvements.

I do like the look much better being lowered a tad and the wheels punched out a little bit too. Makes a world of difference.

I am very happy to see a FL shop work on a "base" C2, instead of all the higher end specs. Yes, that's what I have, a lowly poverty spec C2. ​​​​​​​
The following 2 users liked this post by PHX:
Flat6Motorsports (12-13-2022), kj71109 (12-16-2022)
Old 12-09-2022, 02:55 PM
  #45  
992cs.ind
AutoX
 
992cs.ind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2022
Posts: 12
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Flat6Motorsports
Hey all, this is Jon from Flat 6 Motorsports. We recently picked up a 992 Carrera that we've done and will be doing a lot of testing and development on. I thought I'd start a thread to share some updates as we have data/testing results and pictures, info and insights. We'll be testing about 15 different exhaust combinations, tuning, suspension, intercoolers, turbos, water/meth, etc. Just a quick running list of parts/solutions we'll be testing:M-Engineering ECU TuneM-Engineering PDK TuneFlat 6 Banks Chrono + KitFlat 6 Wheel Spacer KitOEM S/GTS TurbosCSF IntercoolerH&R Lowering SpringsBilstein EVO CoiloversExhausts from Soul, Kline, Akrapovic, iPE, Link Pipes w/ PSEFlat 6 LED Side MarkersFlat 6 Water/Meth Injection KitAWE FoilersOEM PCCB Calipers w/ Girodisc 2-Peice Steel Rotors (410mm/390mm)Do88 Inlets/HosesBC Forged RZ05 Wheels / Michelin Cup 2 TiresPure Turbos
Why no plenum?
The following users liked this post:
recarv (12-31-2023)


Quick Reply: 992 Base Carrera Build (Flat 6 Motorsports)



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:59 AM.