Notices
992 2019-Present The Forum for the Non-Turbo 911
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Hate the 992??! OFFICIAL VENTING THREAD # Ultimate bashing allowed. Step in the ring.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-22-2019 | 10:47 PM
  #1066  
stout's Avatar
stout
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,919
Likes: 1,334
From: ^ The Bay Bridge
Default

Originally Posted by STG
Was trying to find the exact post, but didn't Stout say they engineers told him the new shifter was made smaller because a larger one would put too much torque and pressure on the transmission??
Something along those lines, but more a matter of the "why" the latest PDK shifter is so small:

In asking a designer, I learned early plans to do what they've done in the past for the PDK shifter were met with an interesting comment from an engineer: If you put a big lever there, humans will feed big torque in it (apparently, we'd all be surprised by just how much). And then, he said, you have to build a new PDK shifter that can deal with that torque, which adds weight to a shifter few use vs the paddles. So, small shifter > less torque fed into it > less weight.
Old 01-22-2019 | 11:46 PM
  #1067  
STG's Avatar
STG
Thread Starter
Race Director
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 13,800
Likes: 200
From: FL
Default

Originally Posted by stout
Something along those lines, but more a matter of the "why" the latest PDK shifter is so small:

In asking a designer, I learned early plans to do what they've done in the past for the PDK shifter were met with an interesting comment from an engineer: If you put a big lever there, humans will feed big torque in it (apparently, we'd all be surprised by just how much). And then, he said, you have to build a new PDK shifter that can deal with that torque, which adds weight to a shifter few use vs the paddles. So, small shifter > less torque fed into it > less weight.

Porsche must be in cahoots with the #MeToo movement. There was a time when a manly shifter was acceptable and thrusting torque was desired

Now they're trying to feminize every male ... there's nothing wrong with a BIG lever. Some guys prefer to FEED BIG TORQUE apparently as you say!

You know this is all some made up excuse for a small, inadequate, (and fugly) shifter. The Porsche engineers aren't fooling me!!! You're sitting in a seat and are literally putting little weight on the shifter. If anything, you'd have more leverage over the *small* shorty stubby shifter.

The only way you'd have a lot of torque pressing down on your shifter is if there was a girl on your lap, but that's another story.

Pete, you don't buy all this engineer nonsense do you??
Old 01-23-2019 | 12:51 AM
  #1068  
ipse dixit's Avatar
ipse dixit
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 17,417
Likes: 12,433
Default

Originally Posted by stout
Something along those lines, but more a matter of the "why" the latest PDK shifter is so small:

In asking a designer, I learned early plans to do what they've done in the past for the PDK shifter were met with an interesting comment from an engineer: If you put a big lever there, humans will feed big torque in it (apparently, we'd all be surprised by just how much). And then, he said, you have to build a new PDK shifter that can deal with that torque, which adds weight to a shifter few use vs the paddles. So, small shifter > less torque fed into it > less weight.
The 991 PDK shifter always looked out of place and it bit clumsy. Like shifter *** *****
Old 01-23-2019 | 12:54 AM
  #1069  
STG's Avatar
STG
Thread Starter
Race Director
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 13,800
Likes: 200
From: FL
Default

Originally Posted by ipse dixit
The 991 PDK shifter always looked out of place and it bit clumsy. Like shifter *** *****


You must really have liked the GT3 shifter then!

You have some weird taste my friend, you are the only one over the years that I've heard mention that did not like the 991 shifter. You're also one of the 3 people on here showing love for nubbin. Hmmmmmmm ... shifter size envy?
Old 01-23-2019 | 01:06 AM
  #1070  
Argon_'s Avatar
Argon_
Pro
 
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 708
Likes: 8
From: CT
Default

Originally Posted by STG
Porsche must be in cahoots with the #MeToo movement. There was a time when a manly shifter was acceptable and thrusting torque was desired

Now they're trying to feminize every male ... there's nothing wrong with a BIG lever. Some guys prefer to FEED BIG TORQUE apparently as you say!

You know this is all some made up excuse for a small, inadequate, (and fugly) shifter. The Porsche engineers aren't fooling me!!! You're sitting in a seat and are literally putting little weight on the shifter. If anything, you'd have more leverage over the *small* shorty stubby shifter.

The only way you'd have a lot of torque pressing down on your shifter is if there was a girl on your lap, but that's another story.

Pete, you don't buy all this engineer nonsense do you??
How about a conspiracy to convince more customers to but a manual car: Make the PDK shifter an emasculating analog, and watch men line up to buy a real stick.
Old 01-23-2019 | 01:14 AM
  #1071  
STG's Avatar
STG
Thread Starter
Race Director
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 13,800
Likes: 200
From: FL
Default

The only reason Porsche still makes manuals is because the Rennlist lynch mob. They would have given up a long time ago #MeToo
Old 01-23-2019 | 01:45 AM
  #1072  
Porsche911GTS'16's Avatar
Porsche911GTS'16
Drifting
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 2,244
Likes: 1,214
From: Playa Del Rey, CA
Default

As one of my orthopaedic surgery mentors would say, the nubbin is a "solution looking for a problem." Perhaps the 911 interior engineers were just looking to mix things up? Perhaps they thought the nubbin was more in keeping with the ethos of the 911 (unlikely)? Perhaps it really was to decrease the torque that the driver has to use in order to drive? For me, that is an over-engineered excuse for an over-engineered nubbin which is - to me and to many others - far uglier than the outgoing gear shifter and without debate less functional.

There are more attractive and more ergonomic ways to go about providing a drive-park-reverse function.

I do not think it is a coincidence that the nubbin does not get any "air time" from Porsche when showing off its newest 911. The nubbin is sure to end up in the "where are they now?" bin of the Porsche engineering laboratory.
Old 01-23-2019 | 02:33 AM
  #1073  
groundhog's Avatar
groundhog
Race Car
 
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 1,092
Default

The nubbin avoids the reach around to switches and buttons - and is neutral relative to a LHD or RHD car. I'm not a fan of it but it is definitely functional (its still looks strange and very much like a shaver).
Old 01-23-2019 | 03:04 AM
  #1074  
Porsche911GTS'16's Avatar
Porsche911GTS'16
Drifting
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 2,244
Likes: 1,214
From: Playa Del Rey, CA
Default

Like I said...a solution looking for a problem. I have never had issue reaching the buttons on the passenger side of the stick shifter. Never even crossed my mind. My biggest gripe with the 991 interior is the cup holder. It is clever but in ways impractical. I have had multiple spills onto said buttons when going over a speed bump. All of that being said, I love the 991 cup holder compared to the 992 black hole, big gulp edition.
Old 01-23-2019 | 03:09 AM
  #1075  
groundhog's Avatar
groundhog
Race Car
 
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 1,092
Default

I have to say I like the cupholders in the 981 and 991 - simple and not an eyesore. The big gulp cup holder looks really out of place in a sportscar or higher end vehicle - at least to me. Just looks odd - can it be replaced with something else?
Old 01-23-2019 | 03:30 AM
  #1076  
Noah Fect's Avatar
Noah Fect
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 6,243
Likes: 1,305
From: Pac NW
Default

The 9x1 shifter was bigger and gaudier than necessary, I agree. If they had been shipping cars with nubbins all along and then unveiled the 992 with the current PDK shifter, people would have been just as vocal in their complaints.

But they've gone way too far in the opposite direction now. What would have been wrong with the Panamera's shifter? Seems like that would have avoided a lot of the criticism.
Old 01-23-2019 | 03:39 AM
  #1077  
arek's Avatar
arek
Instructor
 
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 235
Likes: 149
From: Germany
Default

Originally Posted by groundhog
The nubbin avoids the reach around to switches and buttons - and is neutral relative to a LHD or RHD car. I'm not a fan of it but it is definitely functional (its still looks strange and very much like a shaver).
I on the other hand don't mind the look of it but will miss being able to shift manually using the lever. Paddles are great on a track but I prefer using the lever on normal roads in 991.
Old 01-23-2019 | 10:01 AM
  #1078  
Senna01's Avatar
Senna01
Instructor
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 207
Likes: 62
From: London, UK.
Default

Originally Posted by groundhog
The nubbin avoids the reach around to switches and buttons - and is neutral relative to a LHD or RHD car. I'm not a fan of it but it is definitely functional (its still looks strange and very much like a shaver).
I don't remember anyone complaining about the similar shaver on the 918



.


Old 01-23-2019 | 10:41 AM
  #1079  
chuckbdc's Avatar
chuckbdc
Race Car
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,599
Likes: 327
From: Maryland USA
Default

Does anyone think they were actually shifting anything more than an electric switch with the "classic" PDK fake gearshift lever? Sure hate to put too much torque on that!
Old 01-23-2019 | 10:42 AM
  #1080  
STG's Avatar
STG
Thread Starter
Race Director
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 13,800
Likes: 200
From: FL
Default

Originally Posted by Senna01
I don't remember anyone complaining about the similar shaver on the 918



That's ugly too..


Quick Reply: Hate the 992??! OFFICIAL VENTING THREAD # Ultimate bashing allowed. Step in the ring.



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:17 AM.