Notices
991 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

991 GT3 info from the source!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-03-2011, 09:32 AM
  #136  
MarekN
Racer
 
MarekN's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

To be fair to the Ferrari, 10 secs over 21 km is no big difference. All the NBR times should be taken with a grain of salt in regards to the used tires (the Italia doesn´t come standard with Corsas or Cups), weather, driver, etc.

In roll-on acceleration, I am sure the Ferrari would devour the RS, if only for the simple fact that it has seamless gearshifts which just cannot be matched by our cars. And it´s handy in the corners, too, I am sure.

Nevertheless, I am sorry they don´t make it in manual, would be a very interesting alternative.

Now as for the rumoured RS 4,0, I just hope it happens and blows our minds.

The scary fact is that in terms of performance and track times, the writing on the wall is pointing at the MP4-12C at the moment, so all our cars, including the RS 4,0, will be side-tracked to that end.
That will not make our cars any less magical, just a little overwhelmed.
Old 02-03-2011, 09:47 AM
  #137  
utkinpol
Rennlist Member
 
utkinpol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,902
Received 23 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Larry Cable
I think they are going to have to work hard to find another 72bhp ... Clearly it's possible given the work Porsche have done with the Mezger engine ... Although even that stretches the reliability I can imagine that such an engine may be derived from an 9A1 block but it wil probably need some of the same magic applied to the GT1 block ... All of which were developed for motorsport 1st ...

107bhp/litre vs 126/litre ... I suppose its not beyond belief right?

beers on me!
i would guess they will balance engine better, increase redline to 8500 and here are your 70 more horses.
Old 02-03-2011, 09:50 AM
  #138  
911rox
Rennlist Member
 
911rox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Regretfully not at a track... :(
Posts: 2,571
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

It wasn't intended as a swipe at the F458 Mark, just trying to make the point that the F458 is an example of cutting edge design and manufacturing processes and with bucket loads more power and yet isn't exactly light years ahead in overall performance...

The GT3 and RS do benefit from semi-slicks but the F458 more than makes up for that with the extra 120+ hp and the double clutch...
Old 02-03-2011, 10:02 AM
  #139  
utkinpol
Rennlist Member
 
utkinpol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,902
Received 23 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ADias
From an engineering perspective I see nothing wrong about the use of high tech adhesives in the assembly of modern engines, especially if they are mounted on street cars. Those engines should last 200k miles. If those methods do not make sense on engines destined to be rebuilt every 100 hours, I imagine that those procedures will change when a 9A1 motorsports version is released.
i would think any race motor will have to be rebuild every 100 hours no matter what its brand is. it is just natural wear and tear and safety issue.

but I think if porsche will decide to make a race version of 9a1 they will figure it out, probably. racing teams cannot send engines to germany for service.
Old 02-03-2011, 10:04 AM
  #140  
aussie jimmy
Rennlist Member
 
aussie jimmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: sydney
Posts: 6,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

if people are man enough to put their beloved 458 on the same dyno, same day, as a 3rs, then i would hazard a guess that the numbers may show alot less difference than the claimed numbers would suggest...
Old 02-03-2011, 10:06 AM
  #141  
aussie jimmy
Rennlist Member
 
aussie jimmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: sydney
Posts: 6,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MarekN
To be fair to the Ferrari, 10 secs over 21 km is no big difference. All the NBR times should be taken with a grain of salt in regards to the used tires (the Italia doesn´t come standard with Corsas or Cups), weather, driver, etc.

In roll-on acceleration, I am sure the Ferrari would devour the RS, if only for the simple fact that it has seamless gearshifts which just cannot be matched by our cars. And it´s handy in the corners, too, I am sure.

Nevertheless, I am sorry they don´t make it in manual, would be a very interesting alternative.

Now as for the rumoured RS 4,0, I just hope it happens and blows our minds.

The scary fact is that in terms of performance and track times, the writing on the wall is pointing at the MP4-12C at the moment, so all our cars, including the RS 4,0, will be side-tracked to that end.
That will not make our cars any less magical, just a little overwhelmed.
hi marek,
are czech girls all really as hot as they are depicted?
Old 02-03-2011, 10:52 AM
  #142  
savyboy
Drifting
 
savyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Reno NV
Posts: 3,371
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Rolling start drag race: A 430 pulls from a .2 3RS at every shift. A 458 will destroy a 3RS in a drag. We drag raced for fun during lunch at a track last fall.
Old 02-03-2011, 11:34 AM
  #143  
rosenbergendo
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
rosenbergendo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,711
Received 625 Likes on 299 Posts
Default

A 458 will destroy GT3 and RS from a dig, 0-60, and on any track. The cars are not comparable. I have been on track with three of the 458's as well as got a 10 lap stint in one and the car is unbelievable. The transmission and the extra horses make a BIG difference. I am sure others who track a lot can chime in and back me up here!
Old 02-03-2011, 01:27 PM
  #144  
Larry Cable
Rennlist Member
 
Larry Cable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: S.F Bay Area
Posts: 25,772
Received 3,596 Likes on 2,340 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by utkinpol
i would guess they will balance engine better, increase redline to 8500 and here are your 70 more horses.
I doubt it is that simple; its clearly possible, but extracting 126bhp/litre from any engine is quite a challenge. Even our beloved Mezger GT-1 block only delivers 118bhp/litre in its most potent street/production form, and it took 10 years from 1st (street) production and 4+ variants to attain that output.

996.1 3.6L 360bhp 100bhp/l
996.2 3.6L 381bhp 106bhp/l
997.1 3.6L 415bhp 115bhp/l
997.2 3.8L 435bhp 114bhp/l
997.2 RS 3.8L 450bhp 118bhp/l

just to put it into perspective:

997 GT3 RSR 3.9L 455bhp 116bhp/l
997 GT3 R 3.9L 480bhp 123bhp/l

So what is proposed is, to take an engine that currently develops 408bhp or 107bhp/l and 'tweak' it to produce the same/more bhp/l than the current most powerful 'race' engine ...

Assuming bhp/l is a linear relationship the 9A1 would have to be a 4.4L displacement to generate 480bhp at its current bhp/l (107) abillities.

My point is that this is more than a K&N filter, aftermarket exhaust, headers, and an ECU remap

attaining an increment of 19bhp/l will be no mean feat of engine technology and will most likely require much of the same technology that the GT-1 block
enshrines (in particular Ti components to enable rpms > 6800)

YMMV...
Old 02-03-2011, 02:09 PM
  #145  
utkinpol
Rennlist Member
 
utkinpol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,902
Received 23 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Larry Cable
I doubt it is that simple; its clearly possible, but extracting 126bhp/litre from any engine is quite a challenge. Even our beloved Mezger GT-1 block only delivers 118bhp/litre in its most potent street/production form, and it took 10 years from 1st (street) production and 4+ variants to attain that output.

996.1 3.6L 360bhp 100bhp/l
996.2 3.6L 381bhp 106bhp/l
997.1 3.6L 415bhp 115bhp/l
997.2 3.8L 435bhp 114bhp/l
997.2 RS 3.8L 450bhp 118bhp/l

just to put it into perspective:

997 GT3 RSR 3.9L 455bhp 116bhp/l
997 GT3 R 3.9L 480bhp 123bhp/l

So what is proposed is, to take an engine that currently develops 408bhp or 107bhp/l and 'tweak' it to produce the same/more bhp/l than the current most powerful 'race' engine ...

Assuming bhp/l is a linear relationship the 9A1 would have to be a 4.4L displacement to generate 480bhp at its current bhp/l (107) abillities.

My point is that this is more than a K&N filter, aftermarket exhaust, headers, and an ECU remap

attaining an increment of 19bhp/l will be no mean feat of engine technology and will most likely require much of the same technology that the GT-1 block
enshrines (in particular Ti components to enable rpms > 6800)

YMMV...
i know, for NA car anything above 120 hp/l is quite a rarity.
but i think it is exactly what will happen - 4L+ displacement 9A1 engine in a sport configuration, with 115-120 hp/l. should be doable for porsche to build one. if they will do 4L Mezger then they most likely will stick to 4L. Why not?
With Mezger they were limited by GT1 block, with 9A1 there is more space, hypothetically speaking.

and adding a K&N filter, aftermarket exhaust, headers, and an ECU remap - can`t wait to see it in a flesh.
Old 02-03-2011, 02:21 PM
  #146  
Larry Cable
Rennlist Member
 
Larry Cable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: S.F Bay Area
Posts: 25,772
Received 3,596 Likes on 2,340 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by utkinpol
i know, for NA car anything above 120 hp/l is quite a rarity.
but i think it is exactly what will happen - 4L+ displacement 9A1 engine in a sport configuration, with 115-120 hp/l. should be doable for porsche to build one. if they will do 4L Mezger then they most likely will stick to 4L. Why not?
With Mezger they were limited by GT1 block, with 9A1 there is more space, hypothetically speaking.

and adding a K&N filter, aftermarket exhaust, headers, and an ECU remap - can`t wait to see it in a flesh.
I forgot the Sprint Booster!!!

I agree there is no reason they cannot go to a 39xx displacement to get 123bhp/l but they will have to (I think) replace the major moving components with
Ti in order to rev it ... so I see it as more of a hybrid 9A1 and Mezger engine, using the block from the 9A1 and the pistons etc (at least the technology/methodology) from the GT-1/Mezger ...

WTF do I know anyway!

All I really want to see is a 'better' car; less stupid sh*t in the cockpit for dealers to pre-configure into over-priced luxo-boxes while real enthusiasts cant
get an allocation to build their own dream car, I'd like to see it lighter, I'd like to see PDK S for those that want it, and a manual for those that dont.

Actually since I love my '10 997.2 GT3 I doubt I will care when the 991 comes out, but we will see (I will make sure I have an appropriate hat to eat when that day comes).
Old 02-03-2011, 02:28 PM
  #147  
Steve W
Racer
 
Steve W's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: PV Estates, CA
Posts: 379
Received 103 Likes on 40 Posts
Default

The 997 GT3 RSR 3.8 produces 485 hp breathing through two manditory 30.3 mm restrictors. 4.0 produces 455 hp breathing through two 29.5 mm restrictors. Without restrictors, the engine makes 575 hp, that's 143.75 hp/L.
Old 02-03-2011, 02:34 PM
  #148  
ADias
Nordschleife Master
 
ADias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Southwest
Posts: 8,309
Received 395 Likes on 271 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Larry Cable
... less stupid sh*t in the cockpit for dealers to pre-configure into over-priced luxo-boxes while real enthusiasts cant
get an allocation to build their own dream car, ...
Good luck with that.
Old 02-03-2011, 02:36 PM
  #149  
utkinpol
Rennlist Member
 
utkinpol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,902
Received 23 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Steve W
The 997 GT3 RSR 3.8 produces 485 hp breathing through two manditory 30.3 mm restrictors. 4.0 produces 455 hp breathing through two 29.5 mm restrictors. Without restrictors, the engine makes 575 hp, that's 143.75 hp/L.
well, it may make 575hp, but for how long? restrictors are there for a reason.
Old 02-03-2011, 02:38 PM
  #150  
Larry Cable
Rennlist Member
 
Larry Cable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: S.F Bay Area
Posts: 25,772
Received 3,596 Likes on 2,340 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Steve W
The 997 GT3 RSR 3.8 produces 485 hp breathing through two manditory 30.3 mm restrictors. 4.0 produces 455 hp breathing through two 29.5 mm restrictors. Without restrictors, the engine makes 575 hp, that's 143.75 hp/L.
Thanks, I knew about the restrictors, but not the specs. Its a data point, but it's a Mezger derived *race* engine that doesn't have to adhere to emissions or any of the durability/servicability requirements of a production car, so I am not sure how practical it is as a predictor of 'attainability' for a future 9A1 blocked GT3 production car engine ...

I guess I shall remain a 9A1 sceptic until such time as PAG unveils a 9A1 with an additional 18-20 bhp/l in a norm aspirated product (or motorsports for that matter). I am sure they may ... we'll see!

Regardless, I doubt we the customer will see any particular cost savings from such an engine being passed on in a commensurate discount of the MSRP!


Quick Reply: 991 GT3 info from the source!



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:56 PM.