Modifying 991.1 steering software
#46
Rennlist Member
Very good point
My previous GTS had a very aggressive "track" alignment ( from previous owner) and although it was identical to my current GTS, the turning and mid-corner behavior was almost like a different car, (in a very good way)
unfortunately the aggressive alignment meant the car would wander all over the road if the road had any imperfections making it difficult to daily drive. I eventually had the dealer re-align the car to factory spec and it was a night and day difference,
I am not too savvy around the subject of toe/camber changes but those familiar with track focused alignment can probably attest that "turn in" and mid-corner" feedback can be exponentially improved via track alignment.
That said, the EPS software versions can absolutely vary between model line ups and provide very different feedback and experience. Since the software decides how much turn in would be allowed based on steering input from driver, I am imagine it can make a huge difference.
lovig this thread, so much new and interesting information.
#47
Premium Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Very good point
My previous GTS had a very aggressive "track" alignment ( from previous owner) and although it was identical to my current GTS, the turning and mid-corner behavior was almost like a different car, (in a very good way)
unfortunately the aggressive alignment meant the car would wander all over the road if the road had any imperfections making it difficult to daily drive. I eventually had the dealer re-align the car to factory spec and it was a night and day difference,
I am not too savvy around the subject of toe/camber changes but those familiar with track focused alignment can probably attest that "turn in" and mid-corner" feedback can be exponentially improved via track alignment.
That said, the EPS software versions can absolutely vary between model line ups and provide very different feedback and experience. Since the software decides how much turn in would be allowed based on steering input from driver, I am imagine it can make a huge difference.
lovig this thread, so much new and interesting information.
My previous GTS had a very aggressive "track" alignment ( from previous owner) and although it was identical to my current GTS, the turning and mid-corner behavior was almost like a different car, (in a very good way)
unfortunately the aggressive alignment meant the car would wander all over the road if the road had any imperfections making it difficult to daily drive. I eventually had the dealer re-align the car to factory spec and it was a night and day difference,
I am not too savvy around the subject of toe/camber changes but those familiar with track focused alignment can probably attest that "turn in" and mid-corner" feedback can be exponentially improved via track alignment.
That said, the EPS software versions can absolutely vary between model line ups and provide very different feedback and experience. Since the software decides how much turn in would be allowed based on steering input from driver, I am imagine it can make a huge difference.
lovig this thread, so much new and interesting information.
Totally understand that adjusting steering resistance and possibly varying steering ratio is another tool in the tool box. And sounds like fun to play with.
__________________
PCA National Instructor
TPC Racing stats:
2023 Porsche Sprint Challenge 992 Cup Am Champion
2023 Porsche Sprint Challenge GT4 Pro-Am Team Champion
2022 Porsche Sprint Challenge 992 Cup & 991 Cup Champion
2020 IMSA GT3 Cup Challenge 2nd Championship
2018 IMSA GT3 Cup Challenge 2nd Championship
2016 IMSA GT3 Cup Challenge Champion
2013 IMSA GT3 Cup Challenge Champion
2006 Rolex-24 @ Daytona GT Champion
2004 Grand-Am SGS Class Champion
PCA National Instructor
TPC Racing stats:
2023 Porsche Sprint Challenge 992 Cup Am Champion
2023 Porsche Sprint Challenge GT4 Pro-Am Team Champion
2022 Porsche Sprint Challenge 992 Cup & 991 Cup Champion
2020 IMSA GT3 Cup Challenge 2nd Championship
2018 IMSA GT3 Cup Challenge 2nd Championship
2016 IMSA GT3 Cup Challenge Champion
2013 IMSA GT3 Cup Challenge Champion
2006 Rolex-24 @ Daytona GT Champion
2004 Grand-Am SGS Class Champion
The following 2 users liked this post by Tom@TPC Racing:
desmotesta (03-13-2023),
nhnguy12 (03-13-2023)
#48
I would love for someone with much more experience/capability like yourself to try the software calibration changes next time you have a 991.1 C2S on hand and give your thoughts on it.
#49
Three Wheelin'
nhnguy12, i love AZ88. oblig pic from my last drive there.
i'd really like to hear someone else's impression of the difference on a 991.1 with the error from just a drive around the block with the GT3 dropdown checked.
i'd really like to hear someone else's impression of the difference on a 991.1 with the error from just a drive around the block with the GT3 dropdown checked.
The following users liked this post:
nhnguy12 (03-13-2023)
#50
Rennlist Member
Would love to see a newer 991.1/2 successfully try this setting change. If anyone is on Long Island, come on by, only takes a minute. Coding is very different than flashing, which can be scary. Coding is like going to the preferences section of an application and making a setting change vs installing/updating software.
Last edited by AdamSanta85; 03-13-2023 at 01:09 PM.
The following users liked this post:
nhnguy12 (03-13-2023)
#51
Have you had the chance to drive the car quickly since making the update?
The following 2 users liked this post by nhnguy12:
AdamSanta85 (03-13-2023),
jfischet (03-13-2023)
#52
Rennlist Member
To me, having a different steering feel(more or less power assist) does not change the tire grip. A lot of drivers like zero toe, which can make the feel "very neutral" or reduced resistance or can also be interpreted as less feel. Some drivers prefer the very neutral, some not. Example, toe-in generally increase resistance that can be interpreted as more feel.
Totally understand that adjusting steering resistance and possibly varying steering ratio is another tool in the tool box. And sounds like fun to play with.
Totally understand that adjusting steering resistance and possibly varying steering ratio is another tool in the tool box. And sounds like fun to play with.
#53
Three Wheelin'
no, i haven't pushed it at all just driven around the block a few times.
the last time i swapped back to normal i could feel the difference in reverse pulling out of the driveway. it feels as thought the EPS is actively adding resistance in normal mode.
#54
Rennlist Member
https://cobbtuning.atlassian.net/wik...rsche+PIWIS+II
My assumption is updating EPS firmware will be similar to updating PDK firmware shown above
My assumption is updating EPS firmware will be similar to updating PDK firmware shown above
The following users liked this post:
nhnguy12 (03-13-2023)
#55
Hello again! I believe I found the way to deactivate the error thrown by the EPS module. I went into engineering mode and singled out all the MFD warning lights that mention "steering":
I think the most likely suspect is code (121). I would change that to "nicht aktiv" and take the car out for a spin before going too crazy with trying to force-update the module or replacing any physical components. Based off jfischet's feedback it seems like calibration runs fine without changing anything else on the car. Hopefully someone can test this out and let us know if it works.
I think the most likely suspect is code (121). I would change that to "nicht aktiv" and take the car out for a spin before going too crazy with trying to force-update the module or replacing any physical components. Based off jfischet's feedback it seems like calibration runs fine without changing anything else on the car. Hopefully someone can test this out and let us know if it works.
#56
Three Wheelin'
Hello again! I believe I found the way to deactivate the error thrown by the EPS module. I went into engineering mode and singled out all the MFD warning lights that mention "steering":
I think the most likely suspect is code (121). I would change that to "nicht aktiv" and take the car out for a spin before going too crazy with trying to force-update the module or replacing any physical components. Based off jfischet's feedback it seems like calibration runs fine without changing anything else on the car. Hopefully someone can test this out and let us know if it works.
I think the most likely suspect is code (121). I would change that to "nicht aktiv" and take the car out for a spin before going too crazy with trying to force-update the module or replacing any physical components. Based off jfischet's feedback it seems like calibration runs fine without changing anything else on the car. Hopefully someone can test this out and let us know if it works.
I'll try to update this setting this weekend and report back.
i also had been thinking about trying some of the other steering maps to see if i could feel the difference.
(if, for example, the 4S map feels exactly the same as the GT3 map then that could mean the error is valid and the steering software is going into some sort of default mode, which is why it feels very different from the S map.)
Last edited by jfischet; 03-25-2023 at 02:10 AM.
The following users liked this post:
nhnguy12 (03-24-2023)
#57
great work!
I'll try to update this setting this weekend and report back.
i also had been thinking about trying some of the other steering maps to see if i could feel the difference.
(if, for example, the 4S map feels exactly the same as the GT3 map then that could mean the error is valid and the steering software is going into some sort of default mode, which is why it feels very different from the S map.)
I'll try to update this setting this weekend and report back.
i also had been thinking about trying some of the other steering maps to see if i could feel the difference.
(if, for example, the 4S map feels exactly the same as the GT3 map then that could mean the error is valid and the steering software is going into some sort of default mode, which is why it feels very different from the S map.)
#58
Three Wheelin'
i was able to test again tonight.
first: confirmed, setting (120) and (121) to inactive suppresses the warning on the dash.
second: the C4/S setting feels almost exactly the same as the C2/S one and the GT3 file feels much different, better, lighter. this was still just around the neighborhood.
not going to be able to get in a good drive until after the end of next week.
first: confirmed, setting (120) and (121) to inactive suppresses the warning on the dash.
second: the C4/S setting feels almost exactly the same as the C2/S one and the GT3 file feels much different, better, lighter. this was still just around the neighborhood.
not going to be able to get in a good drive until after the end of next week.
#59
i was able to test again tonight.
first: confirmed, setting (120) and (121) to inactive suppresses the warning on the dash.
second: the C4/S setting feels almost exactly the same as the C2/S one and the GT3 file feels much different, better, lighter. this was still just around the neighborhood.
not going to be able to get in a good drive until after the end of next week.
first: confirmed, setting (120) and (121) to inactive suppresses the warning on the dash.
second: the C4/S setting feels almost exactly the same as the C2/S one and the GT3 file feels much different, better, lighter. this was still just around the neighborhood.
not going to be able to get in a good drive until after the end of next week.