991.2 Carrera T vs. Carrera S
#16
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
IMHO as a T owner, probably the biggest difference day-to-day is the suspension tuning. I still need to go through and figure out what (if any) parts are different between the T / Base / S, but the T suspension is tuned to be more lively - and I've confirmed this firsthand in back-to-back drives in other Base / S cars (including at PEC-ATL). I suspect this is primarily driven by SPASM damping rate maps, but only the development engineers really know :-)
SSK is an easy $500 bolt-on upgrade. Door pulls are a bit harder - but I think there's at least one person that's done that mod. T interior would be somewhat hard to retrofit. LW Glass should be a drop-in (if pricey). Everything else should be available on either the Base or the S.
Honestly though, they are all great cars - just drive a few - it will usually be obvious which one works best in your hands for your needs.
Good luck with the hunt!
SSK is an easy $500 bolt-on upgrade. Door pulls are a bit harder - but I think there's at least one person that's done that mod. T interior would be somewhat hard to retrofit. LW Glass should be a drop-in (if pricey). Everything else should be available on either the Base or the S.
Honestly though, they are all great cars - just drive a few - it will usually be obvious which one works best in your hands for your needs.
Good luck with the hunt!
#17
Burning Brakes
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Man, it just never fails...
Brownbear, here is a similar thread/title from last year:
https://rennlist.com/forums/991/1103...carrera-s.html
Good on you for asking. TL/DR (and who could blame you for 233 posts of some of that hijinks...): Using ß maths, it would cost you about 15k more to spec a "comparable" S. Now that the 991.2 run is over, much of that has been OBE. And 'comparable' is, of course, completely subjective here, as they are two different cars that just happen to look a lot alike.
I dropped the muffler on mine, but other than that it's as produced from the factory. I'm not even sure if I will pursue a tune at this point (although some guys are doing so and creating beasts!) as the car is absolutely awesome without it in my and many others opinions.
A large difference that hasn't been touched on yet, the only thing you gain with a PDK T is the bespoke T interior and glass, if the car even was spec'd with those. You lose the glass if you spec'd a rear wiper. Otherwise a PDK T is mechanically the exact same as a Base Carrera. The MT T provides you with the shorter ratios (taken from the higher HP Carreras with the larger turbo internals, such as an S) and a mLSD. It really has its own character with the makeup that Porsche created for only this car. One of about 2,000 on the world. Less if you are looking MT vice PDK.
Call it 'Short Stick Syndrome' or hype or marketing, or whatever you care to but the T really is that good. Listen to people who actually own the car. Read facts, not opinions or hyperbole. The combination of all the things that comprise a T makes for a lightweight, fun, individual car. If, and I mean if, there are a lot left on lots at this point and one is in the spec you like, pretty sure you'll be happy with it. And good for you, as that should also help you secure a great deal.
Good luck!
ẞ
Brownbear, here is a similar thread/title from last year:
https://rennlist.com/forums/991/1103...carrera-s.html
Good on you for asking. TL/DR (and who could blame you for 233 posts of some of that hijinks...): Using ß maths, it would cost you about 15k more to spec a "comparable" S. Now that the 991.2 run is over, much of that has been OBE. And 'comparable' is, of course, completely subjective here, as they are two different cars that just happen to look a lot alike.
I dropped the muffler on mine, but other than that it's as produced from the factory. I'm not even sure if I will pursue a tune at this point (although some guys are doing so and creating beasts!) as the car is absolutely awesome without it in my and many others opinions.
A large difference that hasn't been touched on yet, the only thing you gain with a PDK T is the bespoke T interior and glass, if the car even was spec'd with those. You lose the glass if you spec'd a rear wiper. Otherwise a PDK T is mechanically the exact same as a Base Carrera. The MT T provides you with the shorter ratios (taken from the higher HP Carreras with the larger turbo internals, such as an S) and a mLSD. It really has its own character with the makeup that Porsche created for only this car. One of about 2,000 on the world. Less if you are looking MT vice PDK.
Call it 'Short Stick Syndrome' or hype or marketing, or whatever you care to but the T really is that good. Listen to people who actually own the car. Read facts, not opinions or hyperbole. The combination of all the things that comprise a T makes for a lightweight, fun, individual car. If, and I mean if, there are a lot left on lots at this point and one is in the spec you like, pretty sure you'll be happy with it. And good for you, as that should also help you secure a great deal.
Good luck!
ẞ
The following users liked this post:
seis-speed (10-04-2019)
#18
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
All, thank you for all the responses. Very helpful. Appreciate all the support/advise this forum provides.
I will be spending much more time test driving both the manual T and the manual S to make the final decision but a few follow-up questions for those that have driven both:
I will be spending much more time test driving both the manual T and the manual S to make the final decision but a few follow-up questions for those that have driven both:
- Is the T a significantly harsher ride than an S with the sports package?
- Please do not judge me for mentioning another car brand but how does the ride of the T compare to a BMW M3 in terms of general ride comfort for a daily commute?
- Is the T significantly louder than an S with the sports exhaust? I will on occasion want to take a call from the car.
#19
Burning Brakes
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Apples to apples on the T and S ride comfort. Both are PASM Sport height, same tires, and not enough weight difference to matter. Per above, there is possibly some difference in the T setup, which I believe, but my time in an S didn't allow me to do what I've subjected my T to. I'm happy with what I've got.
I've had a BMW. I'll never have another.
Take and make calls in my T all the time. For me, the reduced insulation provides more tire/road and gravel noise than engine noise. You can close the valves and reduce your revs if you need more quiet, but if the road is grooved or gravelly, you're going to hear it.
I've had a BMW. I'll never have another.
Take and make calls in my T all the time. For me, the reduced insulation provides more tire/road and gravel noise than engine noise. You can close the valves and reduce your revs if you need more quiet, but if the road is grooved or gravelly, you're going to hear it.
#20
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I owned and daily drove an F80 M3 sedan with competition package for 2.5 years mostly in comfort and sport setting (20” wheels also). the Carrera T to me feels less harsh and crashy over rough road surfaces in all settings. not sure what it had to do with perhaps the slightly taller tire profile on the T vs the M3 (when i had snow tires on the M3 with OEM 19s instead of the competition package 20s it felt like and handled like i was driving on 4 balloons). both with Michelin Pilot Sports but the T has PS4s where the M3 had the super sports IIRC.
The following users liked this post:
spyderbret (10-04-2019)
#21
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
All, thank you for all the responses. Very helpful. Appreciate all the support/advise this forum provides.
I will be spending much more time test driving both the manual T and the manual S to make the final decision but a few follow-up questions for those that have driven both:
I will be spending much more time test driving both the manual T and the manual S to make the final decision but a few follow-up questions for those that have driven both:
- Is the T a significantly harsher ride than an S with the sports package?
- Please do not judge me for mentioning another car brand but how does the ride of the T compare to a BMW M3 in terms of general ride comfort for a daily commute?
- Is the T significantly louder than an S with the sports exhaust? I will on occasion want to take a call from the car.
911's ride very well especially in Normal Mode, the Sports Exhaust flaps can be closed, so it can be comfy and quiet when needed.
The following users liked this post:
S S (10-04-2019)
#22
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The PSE in my C4S 7M doesn't drone or aggravate. Even in the Florida summer heat I drive mine in "Sport" mode with the windows open to enjoy the sound as much as I can.
If you need to take/make a phone call, raise the windows, turn the A/C on and you will have zero issues hearing the call with the PSE on. I do it all the time. There's a thread on this forum in regards to the PSE and it was one of the most satisfying options that was selected by owners.
I've put 7500 miles on mine since I picked it up in January; Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, North Carolina, Dragon's Tail, Cherohala and Blue Ridge Parkways and to the Barber PTX in Alabama.
All of those miles were in "Sport" mode (except for some really miserable South Carolina secondary roads which would have been a pain in any car) and the ride has been more than tolerable.
I drove a T when shopping and the dealer was keen to highlight the car but it wasn't the right combination. I was also set on AWD, which I've had on other vehicles, so the T didn't make the cut. Hence the C4S. One thing about AWD, when you ACCELERATE, the front end lifts and the car GOES, no drama or wheel spin, just the traffic shrinking in the rear view mirror.
Set down what you need to have, maybe should have, and what you can do without, go from there.
BTW, the Sport Chrono is worth the cost just for the rev match in the manual, wouldn't do without it.
Lastly, availabilty may be the deciding factor. Finding the "right" one led me to an ordered car. 991.2 production may be done. Check with a dealer soon if you're ordering.
If you need to take/make a phone call, raise the windows, turn the A/C on and you will have zero issues hearing the call with the PSE on. I do it all the time. There's a thread on this forum in regards to the PSE and it was one of the most satisfying options that was selected by owners.
I've put 7500 miles on mine since I picked it up in January; Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, North Carolina, Dragon's Tail, Cherohala and Blue Ridge Parkways and to the Barber PTX in Alabama.
All of those miles were in "Sport" mode (except for some really miserable South Carolina secondary roads which would have been a pain in any car) and the ride has been more than tolerable.
I drove a T when shopping and the dealer was keen to highlight the car but it wasn't the right combination. I was also set on AWD, which I've had on other vehicles, so the T didn't make the cut. Hence the C4S. One thing about AWD, when you ACCELERATE, the front end lifts and the car GOES, no drama or wheel spin, just the traffic shrinking in the rear view mirror.
Set down what you need to have, maybe should have, and what you can do without, go from there.
BTW, the Sport Chrono is worth the cost just for the rev match in the manual, wouldn't do without it.
Lastly, availabilty may be the deciding factor. Finding the "right" one led me to an ordered car. 991.2 production may be done. Check with a dealer soon if you're ordering.
The following 2 users liked this post by Ceepe:
AdamSanta85 (10-04-2019),
K C (10-11-2019)
#24
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The only thing that could take me out out of the T was a GT3 manual.
Even then, on the street, the T is tuned just about perfect.
I drove the base, S, GTS Carreras. I wanted a narrow body car and I really liked the T over the S. There are big differences in feel, noise, etc.
I also kept things simple. Manual. No RAS. Car feels awesome. I did throw the glass sunroof in the car. Call it a mismatch but this is a summer car for me that never sees the track.
Even then, on the street, the T is tuned just about perfect.
I drove the base, S, GTS Carreras. I wanted a narrow body car and I really liked the T over the S. There are big differences in feel, noise, etc.
I also kept things simple. Manual. No RAS. Car feels awesome. I did throw the glass sunroof in the car. Call it a mismatch but this is a summer car for me that never sees the track.
The following 2 users liked this post by ClassJ:
S S (10-04-2019),
seis-speed (10-04-2019)
#25
Burning Brakes
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I did a nation wide search a month ago on Autotrader and every new T available was pdk. The reason new Ts are available and sitting on lots is most people who buy a T want a manual in my opinion. Maybe the sales numbers over the past two years say otherwise?
#26
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Came from F80 M3 to manual RAS Carrera T. Have multiple GT cars. Drove base, S, and GTS. The T just feels different. Closest to it a GTS. Not sure if its the shorter ratios, short shift, or PASM tuning. but it feels "better". The T in a manual really is a sweet sweet modern throw back type car. With a simple tune and sport cats-you have a 500hp/500+tq, 3150 lb, rear drive manual 991 that goes like stink. As someone above wrote, the only move that would NOT be a lateral one, would be Gt3 Touring.
The following 4 users liked this post by rosenbergendo:
#27
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
2. GTS and S w/SPASM are same suspension
3. The T is down 80hp to a GTS, a S is down 30.
4. The S has the same brakes as GTS (save for PCCB option)
Could be the short throw shifter... but that is also available on the other models, and costs $250.
Last edited by AdamSanta85; 10-04-2019 at 03:38 PM.
#28
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The standard 911 summer tires are optimized for the dry, the AWD gives an added measure of traction/safety in the wet and launching in all conditions. The AWD takes away some of the oversteer characteristics the RWD has but that OK for me (that's for the track and the more talented/aggressive drivers).
Porsche thinks that AWD has merits and offers it as standard in the 911 Turbo, Panamera GTS/Turbo, and all the Macans and Cayennes.
It's all about personal choice. I don't "get" why someone would put a PDK in a 911, but I understand why they do it.
#29
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
As you're not domiciled in Florida, it's likely you haven't experienced the rain and thunderstorms we get.
The standard 911 summer tires are optimized for the dry, the AWD gives an added measure of traction/safety in the wet and launching in all conditions. The AWD takes away some of the oversteer characteristics the RWD has but that OK for me (that's for the track and the more talented/aggressive drivers).
Porsche thinks that AWD has merits and offers it as standard in the 911 Turbo, Panamera GTS/Turbo, and all the Macans and Cayennes.
It's all about personal choice. I don't "get" why someone would put a PDK in a 911, but I understand why they do it.
The standard 911 summer tires are optimized for the dry, the AWD gives an added measure of traction/safety in the wet and launching in all conditions. The AWD takes away some of the oversteer characteristics the RWD has but that OK for me (that's for the track and the more talented/aggressive drivers).
Porsche thinks that AWD has merits and offers it as standard in the 911 Turbo, Panamera GTS/Turbo, and all the Macans and Cayennes.
It's all about personal choice. I don't "get" why someone would put a PDK in a 911, but I understand why they do it.