Techart/H&R vs GT3 height
#1
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Techart/H&R vs GT3 height
I am beating myself up over suspension choice. Originally I had decided on KW HAS but now I am thinking for nearly the same money I can get H&R or Techart springs and a DSC controller. My experience with coilover height has always been set it and forget it. My car has S-PASM. I love the way it rides. In a perfect world I want the car to drive the same and be GT3 height.
I am also afraid the Techart will ride softer than stock after seeing people with base Carerra saying it rides like stock. The base Carerra spring rates are very soft. This C2S is on the plusher side of what I want out of a 911.
Does anyone know the height of GT3 vs height of H&R or Techart? I feel like the Techart look slightly higher, and H&R lower, then GT3.
H&R
Techart
GT3
I am also afraid the Techart will ride softer than stock after seeing people with base Carerra saying it rides like stock. The base Carerra spring rates are very soft. This C2S is on the plusher side of what I want out of a 911.
Does anyone know the height of GT3 vs height of H&R or Techart? I feel like the Techart look slightly higher, and H&R lower, then GT3.
H&R
Techart
GT3
Last edited by AdamSanta85; 07-13-2019 at 01:08 PM.
#2
Rennlist Member
I don’t know the numbers but it is very slight if at all. I had a 991.1 with TechArts on it and I have a 991.2 GT3 and a 991.2 Cab. The GT3 might be a very little bit lower. I will add that my GT3 settled after a bit and the TechArts settle after a few months as well. That said I will never put TechArts on my cars again. I also have a 991.2 cab and while it sits a bit higher than I would like I won’t lower it until there is a coil over setup that works with PASM (Like the PSS9).
To make a long story short I installed the TechArts early in the ownership cycle and drive the car for 4 years. During that time I had not driven another 991.1. I went a test drove a 991.2 and was shocked how much better it rode than my car. I had noticed that the car had a tendency to porpoise a bit but thought it was normal. After riding in a stock car there was no going back to the crap bouncy TechArts.
Good luck,
Roy
To make a long story short I installed the TechArts early in the ownership cycle and drive the car for 4 years. During that time I had not driven another 991.1. I went a test drove a 991.2 and was shocked how much better it rode than my car. I had noticed that the car had a tendency to porpoise a bit but thought it was normal. After riding in a stock car there was no going back to the crap bouncy TechArts.
Good luck,
Roy
#3
Instructor
Get the KW HAS or H&R has something similar called the VTF. I had H&R springs on my car then went with the H&R VTF.. ride is still very stiff, but lowered it to my liking. H&R drop was not low enough for me.
#4
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
-------
I am going to give H&R a call tomorrow. Their kit is attractive as it is 1/2 the price of the KW. I want to confirm the spring rates vs the KW and PASM-S. I notice the H&R kit does not have helper springs. Also need to confirm it is compatible with PDCC. I would also like to know the spring free length on the KW vs H&R vs PASM-S. Can we maintain OEM spring length using coilover conversion vs springs?
Are PASM-S shocks a different part number/model than the PASM shocks?
I can't shake the feeling that the people that some of the complaints about stiffness of new springs are coming from cars with springs that are much softer (Base or PASM).
Spring Rates
Base 991: 24nm/48nm
PASM: 28nm/62nm
PASM-S/GTS?: 33nm/108nm <- me
KW HAS: 44nm/100nm
Elephant Stage 1: 52nm/96nm
KW VTF: ?
GT3: 45nm/120nm
Last edited by AdamSanta85; 07-14-2019 at 11:13 AM.
#5
KW has a coilover kit that does work with PASM.
I have Eibach on my PASM/Cab 991.1 and it is not even a little bouncy. Still not as low as a GT3 but barely lower than a SPASM car. Also, there is no rake like the HR setups I've seen which I don't care for.
I have Eibach on my PASM/Cab 991.1 and it is not even a little bouncy. Still not as low as a GT3 but barely lower than a SPASM car. Also, there is no rake like the HR setups I've seen which I don't care for.
#6
Rennlist Member
I have techart on my .2 it feels pretty similar to stock pasm. Although i have the dsc controller too which made a difference
The following users liked this post:
AdamSanta85 (07-15-2019)
#7
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Giving H&R a call when they open to talk about their VTF/HAS/Coilover conversion kit. After closer analysis I noticed that while they do not have a separate helper/tender spring, they do appear to have that integrated into their primary springs. Additionally they appear to be straight/linear rate, which from what I read, leads to best performance from the PASM system and the DSC sport. I need to confirm they work with PDCC and the rates. If the rates are similar to the KW, and I am struggling to see what (if any) extra value the KW or Elephant add for nearly 2X the price. H&R make all their parts in Germany, TUV approved, high quality.
Last edited by AdamSanta85; 07-15-2019 at 09:47 AM.
Trending Topics
#8
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
H&R kit does NOT work with PDCC. H&R does NOT publish spring rates. Disappointing.
So it looks like if you want a coilover conversion kit for PDCC you have Elephant or KW as your options.
Now not really sure what to do... H&R or Techart are a crap shoot with their unpublished spring rates, or KW or Elephant coilover conversion but damned pricey for what you get.
So it looks like if you want a coilover conversion kit for PDCC you have Elephant or KW as your options.
Now not really sure what to do... H&R or Techart are a crap shoot with their unpublished spring rates, or KW or Elephant coilover conversion but damned pricey for what you get.
Last edited by AdamSanta85; 07-15-2019 at 02:41 PM.
#10
Rennlist Member
H&R kit does NOT work with PDCC. H&R does NOT publish spring rates. Disappointing.
So it looks like if you want a coilover conversion kit for PDCC you have Elephant or KW as your options.
Now not really sure what to do... H&R or Techart are a crap shoot with their unpublished spring rates, or KW or Elephant coilover conversion but damned pricey for what you get.
So it looks like if you want a coilover conversion kit for PDCC you have Elephant or KW as your options.
Now not really sure what to do... H&R or Techart are a crap shoot with their unpublished spring rates, or KW or Elephant coilover conversion but damned pricey for what you get.
#11
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
I have a line on a used V2 DSC Sport box. Just need to determine if I am going to roll the dice on mystery spring rate H&R/Techart vs KW HAS. Huge price diff.... errrr. I wish the Techart was a tiny bit lower in back. The front looks just about perfect.
#12
Rennlist Member
That sounds amazing, and I considered it, but it is too rich for my blood at this time. I promised wife this car wouldn't become a money pit like my last.
I have a line on a used V2 DSC Sport box. Just need to determine if I am going to roll the dice on mystery spring rate H&R/Techart vs KW HAS. Huge price diff.... errrr. I wish the Techart was a tiny bit lower in back. The front looks just about perfect.
I have a line on a used V2 DSC Sport box. Just need to determine if I am going to roll the dice on mystery spring rate H&R/Techart vs KW HAS. Huge price diff.... errrr. I wish the Techart was a tiny bit lower in back. The front looks just about perfect.
I have a set of used TechArt Springs I would sell for pretty cheap from my 991.1. Here's my car on the TechArt.
Dropped on Tech Art
The following users liked this post:
Pure745 (07-15-2019)
#13
Three Wheelin'
I don't know about Techart or H&R re: spring rates since I didn't look at those options, but for KW HAS I found they are.
KW
Front 250 lbin
Rear 570 lbin
Bilstein B16
Front 399 lbin
Rear 423 lbin
The Bilstein rear number seems low to me but that's what I found. If anyone has another number lmk and I'll update.
KW
Front 250 lbin
Rear 570 lbin
Bilstein B16
Front 399 lbin
Rear 423 lbin
The Bilstein rear number seems low to me but that's what I found. If anyone has another number lmk and I'll update.
#14
Rennlist Member
I don't know about Techart or H&R re: spring rates since I didn't look at those options, but for KW HAS I found they are.
KW
Front 250 lbin
Rear 570 lbin
Bilstein B16
Front 399 lbin
Rear 423 lbin
The Bilstein rear number seems low to me but that's what I found. If anyone has another number lmk and I'll update.
KW
Front 250 lbin
Rear 570 lbin
Bilstein B16
Front 399 lbin
Rear 423 lbin
The Bilstein rear number seems low to me but that's what I found. If anyone has another number lmk and I'll update.
Also i know the B16 springs are progressive, so perhaps they have a different way of measuring the spring rate vs a linear spring?
#15
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
PM'ed definitely interested in the springs.