he’s just stating why he likes his car. It’s okay to like something over something else. People keep posting videos that have nothing to do with the OP so I’ll add another video that I like as well:

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?lis..._SvdBc7j2KkAX0

You Tube

That’s just the thing. If you crave rawness in the sense where you need an N/A screaming behind you without a smaller DI engine and turbo homogenization, the .2 will impress you by power, but none are replacements for a 9K revving, atmospheric engine. I loved the GTS for how it kicks the tail out brutally. But every run up, every downshift was disappointing in terms of sound and communication. Like you’re getting ultimate performance though a load of refinement-filtering.

It did everything better than my .1 C2. But at over double the cost of what my car goes for right now, it’s a tough proposition (for me) to spend that kind of dough and miss the way my 350 HP Carrera sounds and communicates when I rev it, or downshift it (downshifts on .2’s even with PSE sound like a practically silent luxury car, while its utter raucousness is one of my favorite aspects on my car), or its at-one-with-car nearly analogue throttle response. The base .2 (no performance options) was maybe the most disappointing test drive I’ve ever had. I was shocked at how civil and just muted it felt, like the experience factor had been filtered out. Incredibly refined and grown up. Again, fundamentally better than my car in probably every way, but I literally couldn’t run fast enough (I enjoyed the GTS MUCH more thanks to its more violent power more so compensating for the lack of sound, and how much tighter it felt overall) from it. Driving an older car and feeling genuinely BETTER about it after getting out of a newer model is a rarity, which is the case with the Base I drove.

If you don’t feel the same way, then for you perhaps in the .2 gen, there is a close enough “replacement” for the GT3. For me, personally, not at all.

You are correct, the rear seats are a game changer.

Regarding your other point, you keep saying that he is "factually incorrect". I just watched the video again an only caught one fact that I thought was incorrect. He called the seats "fixed back" but they looked like the Euro-only folding backed buckets. Which likely would account for his comment regarding the seating position.

Other er than that, I cannot one FACT that he makes that he is incorrect on. In fact, he basically agrees with everything you say with regards to its capability and performance. He praises the chassis, says the engine has a lot more low down torque, calls it a better car overall than the previous. So what does he say that is a FACT, not opinion, that is incorrect?

There is nothing he said that’s factually incorrect. It’s a classic argument one puts out when they don’t like what’s being said (throwing the word “fact” around as opinion).