Notices
991 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Carrera T-- rage free thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-25-2017, 04:17 PM
  #46  
R_Rated
Banned
 
R_Rated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Where aspirations are natural
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 0
Received 42 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Macduff
I think the T might be more appealing to those of us looking for a dual purpose street/track car while the 997 GT3 may be more appealing to those who want something track focused but still streetable. Also the 997 GT3 may ultimately have a greater cost of ownership since it is out of warranty (though depreciation/appreciation might be better on the GT3, tbd).

I actually have a track focused but still streetable car right now and am thinking to shift back the other direction as I only track my car ~4-5 weekends per year.
Great points. Warranty is a huge aspect here. I'm not one that ever makes car purchases based on depreciation... I think I put the value on smiles behind the wheel and this discussion gets inflated on here...

There is a 996 GT3 a friend bought for 55K a couple years ago and put KWv2 coil-overs on it which really softened the ride. Obviously there's no warranty but an older gen GT3 is within reach now at these prices.

Without provoking a pissing contest... I'd be curious where the 911T stacks up on lap times in terms of older GT3's as a bechmark. Likely faster than the 996 and could be faster than a 997 GT3. We can all rest assured the GT3's of any year will crush it in terms of sound so we can table this too
Old 10-25-2017, 04:39 PM
  #47  
Crester
Pro
 
Crester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 589
Received 67 Likes on 40 Posts
Default

I wonder if the goal of the 911T is even for lap times??? Porsche openly said manual cars are for enjoyment and PDK cars are for lap times.

Personally I want to know just how much more "raw" the 911T feels in comparison to the regular 991.2. When I drove the 991.2 it just felt too luxurious. Maybe the 911T will bring back some of the more connected feeling.
Old 10-25-2017, 04:45 PM
  #48  
R_Rated
Banned
 
R_Rated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Where aspirations are natural
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 0
Received 42 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Crester
I wonder if the goal of the 911T is even for lap times??? Porsche openly said manual cars are for enjoyment and PDK cars are for lap times.

Personally I want to know just how much more "raw" the 911T feels in comparison to the regular 991.2. When I drove the 991.2 it just felt too luxurious. Maybe the 911T will bring back some of the more connected feeling.
It's not - just like a GT3 touring is not since it's manual only. But for whatever reason that is what we revert to as we type on the interwebz - also why some of us love our slower NA cars. Many of us would perceive the 911T to be perfect with a 3.8 (or even a 3.4) since this would not only add to the experience but also shave >100 pounds off the car. I get it - forced induction is the new platform...

Even though the 911T isn't about lap records - it's still interesting to see how it compares. Even us Cab owners just like to know.
Old 10-25-2017, 04:52 PM
  #49  
72offsuit
Racer
 
72offsuit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Like it! here is what I would build:

PJA22J68

http://www.porsche-code.com/PJA22J68

Last edited by 72offsuit; 10-25-2017 at 09:57 PM.
Old 10-25-2017, 04:56 PM
  #50  
go.illini
Pro
 
go.illini's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: central IL
Posts: 525
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Drifting
Adding back in the radio adds 15 lbs, then Bose is an additional 20lbs on top of that.
911T in the USA will have base radio standard due to DOT requirement of backup camera as of May 2018. So ticking the Sport Chrono box only physically adds the wart.
Old 10-25-2017, 05:09 PM
  #51  
Argon_
Pro
Thread Starter
 
Argon_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: CT
Posts: 708
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by go.illini
911T in the USA will have base radio standard due to DOT requirement of backup camera as of May 2018. So ticking the Sport Chrono box only physically adds the wart.
I hate that the screen is now a requirement. Such bullsh1t. And people wonder why distracted driving deaths are up.
Old 10-25-2017, 05:32 PM
  #52  
go.illini
Pro
 
go.illini's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: central IL
Posts: 525
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

I think the 911T is a great idea but a similarly spec'd 911S isn't that much more.

911S
$105,100 base
$810 Sport Seat Plus
$6460 Sport Package
$890 PASM Sport
$115,030 incl delivery

911T
$102,100 base
$2090 Rear Axle Steering
$320 Sport Chrono
$105,560 incl delivery

So comparing apples-to-apples with the same options the difference is $9470 to get an S. I realize the 911T has some differences with the finishes, glass, sound deadening, etc but I personally place little value on those.

Finally it's possible to get 6% or more off an S while I'm sure there will be no discounting the 911T at least in the short term (and more likely ADM) which narrows the difference down to less than $3000.

$3k for better brakes and 50 more HP seems like a no-brainer.
Old 10-25-2017, 05:42 PM
  #53  
quattr0
Instructor
 
quattr0's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 102
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Just in case anyone on the fence PDK or Manny on the T, manual is 44 lbs lighter. Get an after market exhaust which should be another 20 lbs...lighter battery....--> heaven on earth!
Old 10-25-2017, 05:45 PM
  #54  
quattr0
Instructor
 
quattr0's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 102
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by go.illini
I think the 911T is a great idea but a similarly spec'd 911S isn't that much more.

911S
$105,100 base
$810 Sport Seat Plus
$6460 Sport Package
$890 PASM Sport
$115,030 incl delivery

911T
$102,100 base
$2090 Rear Axle Steering
$320 Sport Chrono
$105,560 incl delivery

So comparing apples-to-apples with the same options the difference is $9470 to get an S. I realize the 911T has some differences with the finishes, glass, sound deadening, etc but I personally place little value on those.

Finally it's possible to get 6% or more off an S while I'm sure there will be no discounting the 911T at least in the short term (and more likely ADM) which narrows the difference down to less than $3000.

$3k for better brakes and 50 more HP seems like a no-brainer.
With exact build vs my 991.2 base, the T is 5K more. It's well worth it if I could do it again!!!
Old 10-25-2017, 05:51 PM
  #55  
Joec500
Rennlist Member
 
Joec500's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,003
Received 1,009 Likes on 600 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by quattr0
With exact build vs my 991.2 base, the T is 5K more. It's well worth it if I could do it again!!!
From an initial purchase price, this makes total sense. It will be interesting to see if these hold their re-sale as they age, since there will be fewer of them. I suspect there is a reasonable possibility they will hold their values better than a standard 'S'. Which in the long run, could make them a better buy as I look at the true cost of owning a car, the depreciation, not the actual purchase price.

Sorry I was referring to the previous message you replied to

Last edited by Joec500; 10-25-2017 at 05:52 PM. Reason: replied to wrong message on this thread
Old 10-25-2017, 06:02 PM
  #56  
sticky
Banned
 
sticky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Laguna, CA
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pfbz
All of which is great. To which Porsche adds:
  • Limited Slip
  • Standard sport exhaust.
  • Standard 20" dark wheels.
  • Standard GT sports steering wheel with mode selector
  • Standard short shifter.
  • Some nice interior and exterior cosmetic tweaks.
  • Wart-less sport chrono option. (this one should have been bundled standard as well)

Other than the idea that $105K+ for a 'base' car from anyone sounds a bit preposterous, I love the idea. And given how much performance headroom is thought to be in these 3.0 turbos, it really might be the ultra-hot ticket for those who like a less expensive, lower option, more visceral 911. And hopefully one that is actually obtainable rather than another mega-customer/speculator/flipper intentionally production throttled car.

Parts bin special? Sure... Just like the GTS, R, and most every other 'special' edition.

Not much of a weight reduction? Yup, that's a bit of a stretch. But pull-tab door openers are cool.

Would I want one? Absofukinlutely.
This.

Anyone want a 991.2 base with 3000 miles on it?
Old 10-25-2017, 06:03 PM
  #57  
Drifting
Rennlist Member
 
Drifting's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Rocky Mountains
Posts: 5,156
Received 1,293 Likes on 681 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by go.illini
911T in the USA will have base radio standard due to DOT requirement of backup camera as of May 2018. So ticking the Sport Chrono box only physically adds the wart.
True.

My point was that for car defined in many ways by its weight, adding Bose for another 20lbs may not be the best idea.
Old 10-25-2017, 06:08 PM
  #58  
sticky
Banned
 
sticky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Laguna, CA
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by go.illini
I think the 911T is a great idea but a similarly spec'd 911S isn't that much more.

911S
$105,100 base
$810 Sport Seat Plus
$6460 Sport Package
$890 PASM Sport
$115,030 incl delivery

911T
$102,100 base
$2090 Rear Axle Steering
$320 Sport Chrono
$105,560 incl delivery

So comparing apples-to-apples with the same options the difference is $9470 to get an S. I realize the 911T has some differences with the finishes, glass, sound deadening, etc but I personally place little value on those.

Finally it's possible to get 6% or more off an S while I'm sure there will be no discounting the 911T at least in the short term (and more likely ADM) which narrows the difference down to less than $3000.

$3k for better brakes and 50 more HP seems like a no-brainer.
It's a fair point but the 911 T with the rear seat delete, buckets, and then the PCCB's will undercut the S by over 150 pounds.

With less sound deadening and for those who like a manual the gearing change will definitely make the 911 T more involving.

The 911 T also has going for it that 'limited' aspect which should pad values.

Does anyone know the production run or how many will be produced?
Old 10-25-2017, 08:25 PM
  #59  
worf928
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
worf928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,445
Received 1,612 Likes on 1,052 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by go.illini
So comparing apples-to-apples with the same options the difference is $9470 to get an S. I realize the 911T has some differences with the finishes, glass, sound deadening, etc but I personally place little value on those.

Finally it's possible to get 6% or more off an S while I'm sure there will be no discounting the 911T at least in the short term (and more likely ADM) which narrows the difference down to less than $3000.

$3k for better brakes and 50 more HP seems like a no-brainer.
In my case an apples-to-apples T vs. an S is a ~$13k (list) difference and the S still ends up with a rather drab interior.

Still, $13k for 50 bhp and bigger brakes is cheap in the Porsche List Price world.
Old 10-25-2017, 08:29 PM
  #60  
R_Rated
Banned
 
R_Rated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Where aspirations are natural
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 0
Received 42 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by worf928
In my case an apples-to-apples T vs. an S is a ~$13k (list) difference and the S still ends up with a rather drab interior.

Still, $13k for 50 bhp and bigger brakes is cheap in the Porsche List Price world.
Remember too that you can achieve a 5-7% discount on a "run of the mill" S so that pricing delta quickly closes in.


Quick Reply: Carrera T-- rage free thread



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:12 AM.