Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Consolidated 991RS thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-01-2014, 09:57 PM
  #1696  
Macca
Rennlist Member
 
Macca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 14,140
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

^^^^^ PAG made the decision on this many months ago I am sure (they need lead times for outsourced parts partners etc).

The GT3 always comes at the end of the first model life cycle (i.e. with 996 was launch 1999 after 996 was launched 1996, with 997 launched 2004 the first GT3 was launched Geneva March 2006 etc).

Now that all being said the "facelift" version of each GT3 (996.2/997.2) has typically come out within 12 months of the facelift on the standard car. So for 996.2 GT3 was 2002 and 997.2 was 2009.

So if PAG are releasing the 991.2 in September 2015 (MY2016) - probably launch would be around mid year at an international show, then it would make sense that the 991.2 GT3 may be launched at Geneva March 2016 for production MY2017 September 2016 onwards as is the norm.

Of course all of this being said there is one very noticeable difference between today and 997 days in regards to PAG and that is they are now VWAG. So anything can change and probably will change. Even the way they handled the engine replacement with compensation up to 35,000 USD for our cousins in Europe for loss of use was distinctly "non Porsche" of old (usually handle through warranty and never admit fault like issues with 997/4.0RS intake manifolds, CLs and earlier M96 engine failures - much greater than the 2-3% threshold etc).

Anything we say here is pure speculation till PAG talk.
Old 09-01-2014, 10:10 PM
  #1697  
amfp
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
amfp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,229
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Macca
This makes even less sense. Mark2 versions of GT3 rarely happen in the first 12 months of the facelift. MY2016 is September 2015 and seems way too early for a Mark 2 version but stranger things have happened!
My earlier post was speculation on my part. I just don't see the factory producing 991 GT3's after the RS run. But never know, if based on demand.

These were the spy photos:

http://www.automobilemag.com/feature...-chassis-code/
Old 09-01-2014, 10:21 PM
  #1698  
Macca
Rennlist Member
 
Macca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 14,140
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Hey no dramas! Its all speculation around here right now but still an interesting debate..

The facelift doesn't look like its going to be remarkably different in the sheet metal than the original. Im imagining we are talking front and rear valence, maybe rear engine cover but little in terms of suspension and motive power although my guess is LED headlights will become standard soon and probably software updates for PDK and improvements to electric steering in line with changes made to the 991 GT3 which seem to have arrested many journalists criticism of the earlier system in the 991S.
Old 09-01-2014, 10:25 PM
  #1699  
Macca
Rennlist Member
 
Macca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 14,140
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

P.S. I doubt after we have seen all these 991 GT3 RS test mules, an "accidentally leaked" Minichamps 1/43rd model of the RS and a recently published patent drawings that they are going to rip all that up and wait for 991.2 makeover. After all the .2 revision will be mostly cosmetic and the bodywork and underpinnings of the GT3 are already along way removed form the stock 991. I dont believe the engine issues delayed teh 991.2 GT3RS programme significantly as it was already well under test by then and actually the extra efforts on the replacement engines was beneficial to both model platforms. I agree there has been a spanner thrown in the works with the 991 Gt3 engine issue but suggest its more a marketing/perception and liability concern rather than an outright engineering resource derived issue...
Old 09-01-2014, 10:27 PM
  #1700  
TRAKCAR
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
TRAKCAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: S. Florida
Posts: 29,422
Received 1,670 Likes on 775 Posts
Default

Well, if the 992 facelift debuts soon they better get to it and introduce the RS.
Old 09-01-2014, 10:40 PM
  #1701  
Nizer
Rennlist Member
 
Nizer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Wishing I Was At The Track
Posts: 13,659
Received 1,886 Likes on 972 Posts
Default

And if past is prologue, 991.1 RS will be better looking than 991.2 RS, albeit with a marginal performance deficit.
Old 09-01-2014, 11:29 PM
  #1702  
dntlvet
Pro
 
dntlvet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 604
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Seems like a lot of hype. It is fun to guess what and when the GT3RS will appear and how it will be configured. This is common in all auto forums.
Those with GT3 build dates; just rest and smile.
Old 09-02-2014, 07:55 AM
  #1703  
Tre
Racer
 
Tre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The constant speculation is truly enjoyable, especially when everything seems to be up in the air. I'm just amazed at how the release dates for pretty much every 991 including the facelifted 992 has been (or is) known, but there's this strange aura of mystery around the RS.
Old 09-02-2014, 11:26 AM
  #1704  
Ronan
Rennlist Member
 
Ronan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,727
Received 110 Likes on 66 Posts
Default

It will be built. Components are being built as we speak. I talked to someone involved in fabricating the roof.
Old 09-02-2014, 11:33 AM
  #1705  
9972RS
Burning Brakes
 
9972RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: VA/NJ
Posts: 854
Likes: 0
Received 34 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

^ carbon?
Old 09-02-2014, 12:48 PM
  #1706  
Ronan
Rennlist Member
 
Ronan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,727
Received 110 Likes on 66 Posts
Default

Magnesium.
Old 09-02-2014, 12:52 PM
  #1707  
9972RS
Burning Brakes
 
9972RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: VA/NJ
Posts: 854
Likes: 0
Received 34 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

Really? Mg stronger and lighter than carbon?


Google-fu

http://incar.thyssenkrupp.com/4_05_0...m.html?lang=en

I didn't know the targa roof was Mg
http://www.engineeringtv.com/video/D...nesium-Retract
Old 09-02-2014, 02:37 PM
  #1708  
rosenbergendo
Drifting
 
rosenbergendo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,729
Received 646 Likes on 308 Posts
Default

I have heard MG as well. No carbon? Not sure why.
Old 09-02-2014, 03:09 PM
  #1709  
madmurdock
Rennlist Member
 
madmurdock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Homeless traveler
Posts: 945
Received 87 Likes on 59 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rosenbergendo
I have heard MG as well. No carbon? Not sure why.
I have a friend who glued the roofs and said it's made of magtanium fiber
Old 09-02-2014, 04:47 PM
  #1710  
milban
Rennlist Member
 
milban's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 165
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I thought it was unobtanium.


Quick Reply: Consolidated 991RS thread



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:33 PM.