Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Production has begun!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-18-2013, 03:49 PM
  #46  
MaxLTV
Rennlist Member
 
MaxLTV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: West Vancouver and San Francisco
Posts: 4,254
Received 1,217 Likes on 600 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mooty

let me know too!

my is far down the road.
Of course, we can have our inagural "cars & coffee" meeting right at the dealership
Old 11-19-2013, 05:41 PM
  #47  
CAlexio
Race Director
 
CAlexio's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Hypercar Invitational
Posts: 10,233
Received 1,973 Likes on 917 Posts
Default

More like "drool and coffee" for those of us still waiting :-)
Old 11-19-2013, 08:52 PM
  #48  
karlleonard
Banned
 
karlleonard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dublin Ireland
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

just got my completion date yesterday...due to me in the uk 19 dec

gt silver..ceramics..cant wait

need to clear my 997 cup cars quick lol
Old 11-19-2013, 08:57 PM
  #49  
frayed
Race Car
 
frayed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,972
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by karlleonard
just got my completion date yesterday...due to me in the uk 19 dec

gt silver..ceramics..cant wait

need to clear my 997 cup cars quick lol
Just curious to hear you logic on going ceramics?
Old 11-19-2013, 09:13 PM
  #50  
Nizer
Rennlist Member
 
Nizer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Wishing I Was At The Track
Posts: 13,627
Received 1,863 Likes on 963 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by karlleonard
gt silver..ceramics..cant wait
Maximum bling. I like it.
Old 11-19-2013, 10:15 PM
  #51  
Mike in CA
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
Mike in CA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: North Bay Area, CA
Posts: 11,969
Received 128 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by frayed
Just curious to hear you logic on going ceramics?
Me too. Having chosen PCCB's, additional moral support is welcome.....
Old 11-19-2013, 10:51 PM
  #52  
roberga
Nordschleife Master
 
roberga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: SEATTLE
Posts: 5,165
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mike in CA
Me too. Having chosen PCCB's, additional moral support is welcome.....
Because you wanted them and can afford them. All the reason you need.

BTW: had PCCB on 996GT3: 20,000 miles (40% track) replaced fronts. sold car wit 60,000 miles ( 45% track) never did a thing with rears. Ran p-50 most of the time.

997GT3 40,000 miles 30% track rotors were fine when I sold the car. Never had TC on.
Old 11-19-2013, 11:03 PM
  #53  
fbirch
Burning Brakes
 
fbirch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Metairie, LA
Posts: 792
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by roberga
Because you wanted them and can afford them. All the reason you need.

BTW: had PCCB on 996GT3: 20,000 miles (40% track) replaced fronts. sold car wit 60,000 miles ( 45% track) never did a thing with rears. Ran p-50 most of the time.

997GT3 40,000 miles 30% track rotors were fine when I sold the car. Never had TC on.
That's amazing! To put this in perspective, 45% of 60K mi = 27K track mi. Even on a track w/ very high avg. speed (say 90 MPH), 27K track mi = 300 track hours. At 2.5 hours per track day, 300 track hours = 120 track days = 60 track weekends. It's truly amazing you could get 60 weekends out of one set of rotors.

BTW, did you ever need to refresh the engine at any time, or did it deliver 300 track hours without opening? I've heard claims all over the place for the # of track hours one can milk out of a Mezger. Seems as if the 3.6L in the 996 is among the more robust iterations of the Mezger.
Old 11-19-2013, 11:51 PM
  #54  
roberga
Nordschleife Master
 
roberga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: SEATTLE
Posts: 5,165
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

the first year the car was track use only and saw time at VIR, the Glenn, Sebring before shipped out west. The engine was had a dyno at about 55,000 miles and was about 356. Car ended up as a track car in California. No nothing about it after it left.
Old 11-20-2013, 12:19 AM
  #55  
Mike in CA
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
Mike in CA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: North Bay Area, CA
Posts: 11,969
Received 128 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by roberga
Because you wanted them and can afford them. All the reason you need.

BTW: had PCCB on 996GT3: 20,000 miles (40% track) replaced fronts. sold car wit 60,000 miles ( 45% track) never did a thing with rears. Ran p-50 most of the time.

997GT3 40,000 miles 30% track rotors were fine when I sold the car. Never had TC on.
Reassuring feedback.....thanks.
Old 11-20-2013, 10:23 AM
  #56  
Conekilr
Burning Brakes
 
Conekilr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: The Great White North
Posts: 982
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by roberga
Because you wanted them and can afford them. All the reason you need.

BTW: had PCCB on 996GT3: 20,000 miles (40% track) replaced fronts. sold car wit 60,000 miles ( 45% track) never did a thing with rears. Ran p-50 most of the time.

997GT3 40,000 miles 30% track rotors were fine when I sold the car. Never had TC on.
I think tracking with TC off contributes to longer lasting rotor and pad wear. I always track withTC off, however the new GT3 also have torque vectoring plus which uses the rear brakes which I don't think can be turned off so that will contribute to additional rear rotor wear. Having said that, the rear rotors on the PCCB's are thicker....
Old 11-20-2013, 12:29 PM
  #57  
reidry
Three Wheelin'
 
reidry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Cocoa, FL
Posts: 1,633
Received 11 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Conekilr
I think tracking with TC off contributes to longer lasting rotor and pad wear. I always track withTC off, however the new GT3 also have torque vectoring plus which uses the rear brakes which I don't think can be turned off so that will contribute to additional rear rotor wear. Having said that, the rear rotors on the PCCB's are thicker....
Does someone have confirmation that Torque Vectoring Plus uses the brakes? I thought on the GT3, the Plus part was that it used the electronically variable locking differential instead of the brakes to accomplish torque vectoring.

Ryan
Old 11-20-2013, 12:32 PM
  #58  
Manifold
Rennlist Member
 
Manifold's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mid-Atlantic (on land, not in the middle of the ocean)
Posts: 13,004
Received 4,331 Likes on 2,464 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by reidry
Does someone have confirmation that Torque Vectoring Plus uses the brakes? I thought on the GT3, the Plus part was that it used the electronically variable locking differential instead of the brakes to accomplish torque vectoring.

Ryan
I thought it was the brakes and the e-diff. Speaking of which, I'm starting to wonder about how durable the e-diff will be with track use. I heard that the standard mechanical LSD in the 997 GT3 wasn't durable, and that was certainly my experience with the LSD in the Cayman R.
Old 11-20-2013, 12:39 PM
  #59  
CAlexio
Race Director
 
CAlexio's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Hypercar Invitational
Posts: 10,233
Received 1,973 Likes on 917 Posts
Default

All my excitement of tracking the gt3 after purchase has disappeared reading ab these durability questions from you veterans. Could they have really built a car which is so fragile knowing how mucus track use is a part of the equation?
Old 11-20-2013, 12:44 PM
  #60  
Manifold
Rennlist Member
 
Manifold's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mid-Atlantic (on land, not in the middle of the ocean)
Posts: 13,004
Received 4,331 Likes on 2,464 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CAlexio
All my excitement of tracking the gt3 after purchase has disappeared reading ab these durability questions from you veterans. Could they have really built a car which is so fragile knowing how mucus track use is a part of the equation?
The durability questions apply mainly to those who'll be beating on the car mercilessly at the track, many days a year. The durability should be fine for everyone else (I hope!).


Quick Reply: Production has begun!



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:14 PM.