Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Consolidated 991RS thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-06-2014, 01:17 PM
  #1456  
Mike in CA
Race Director
 
Mike in CA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: North Bay Area, CA
Posts: 11,969
Received 127 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

The issue with hybrids is weight; batteries are heavy.
Old 08-06-2014, 02:00 PM
  #1457  
Petevb
Rennlist Member
 
Petevb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,728
Received 704 Likes on 282 Posts
Default

Flywheels are quite limited. Audi uses a flywheel at Le Mans, but only because its gone for the minimum size hybrid system- a flywheel would be too heavy if they'd gone for a system with 3x the capacity like Toyota and Porsche. The gyroscopic effect of the flywheel also effects handling in the larger sizes.

Batteries on the other hand are getting better. An F1 car's battery pack is ~45 to ~55 lbs, rules prevent it from being lighter, and that's enough to power a 160 hp motor. The complete system, electric motor plus batteries and wiring, likely delivers a power to weight ratio comparable to the very best road-going IC engines, and nearly twice as good as something like the GT3's engine.

Clearly there are issues with practicality, as you'd expect with any technology from F1. The batteries are pushed so hard that their lifespan is measured in races, and don't ask what it costs. But if you step back and consider that just a few years ago teams were electing not to use KERS because they couldn't get it working well enough, you'll realize how quickly this stuff is moving. Hybrid systems are already at the point where they're roughly competitive with an IC engine purely on performance, many would argue they are ahead, even when you ignore efficiency. But while I'm a huge fan of both performance and efficiency, as I've said before emotions are more important to me.
Old 08-06-2014, 02:10 PM
  #1458  
JasonAndreas
Technical Guru
Rennlist Member

 
JasonAndreas's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: USVI
Posts: 8,138
Received 112 Likes on 90 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Nizer
Among the options, Porsche could always opt to pay the penalty for the relatively low-production run GT3 series and pass it on to buyer....

I don't think that's the route Porsche will go as it's pretty clear they're keen to embrace hybrid technology
Penalities for failing to meet CAFE standards are just a cost of business for Porsche. And while I'm sure they always do what they can to reduce payments, they have always been fined and absolutely will not allow the fear of penalties to dictate the total direction of their engine programs.


Code:
1985 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $1,253,580.00 Jul-87 IP
1986 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $823,440.00 Feb-89 IP
1987 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $948,480.00 Jun-89
1988 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $1,048,905.00 May-90
1989 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $1,875,125.00 May-90
1990 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $2,033,770.00 Jul-91
1991 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $1,871,470.00 Feb-94
1992 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $781,575.00 Feb-94
1993 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $668,500.00 Oct-94
1994 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $804,600.00 Dec-96
1995 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $1,949,520.00 Dec-96
1996 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $2,127,600.00 Nov-98
1997 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $2,525,820.00 Nov-98
1998 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $1,613,865.00 Mar-00 
1999 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $4,884,627.00 Jul-00
2000 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $3,720,816.00 Jun-01
2001 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $4,997,190.00 Aug-02
2002 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $4,357,782.00 Mar-04 
2003 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $3,348,609.00 Dec-04
2003 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $189,634.50 Dec-04 
2004 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $3,225,453.00 Jun-05
2004 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $3,171,564.00 Jun-05
2005 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $2,238,082.00 Aug-06
2005 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $1,977,250.00 Aug-06
2006 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $3,010,518.50 Aug-07
2006 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $1,589,346.00 Aug-07
2007 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $1,237,500.00 Jul-08
2008 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $1,143,994.50 Dec-09
2008 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $2,584,587.50 Dec-09
2009 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $1,487,145.00 Oct-10
2010 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $1,121,373.00 Nov-11
2010 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $656,370.00 Nov-11
Old 08-06-2014, 03:02 PM
  #1459  
4forme
Burning Brakes
 
4forme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 809
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by allans
^^^ Sorry it's March. My sources are good too. But, I hope you are right. Allan
I have heard March as well. It was originally going to be Oct but the engine replacements moved it back.
Old 08-06-2014, 03:55 PM
  #1460  
sunnyr
Three Wheelin'
 
sunnyr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,343
Received 105 Likes on 59 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Reza
GT4 is PDK-S only, detuned 3.8 engine
Detuned 3.8 GT3 engine or detuned 3.8 Carrera S engine?
Old 08-06-2014, 04:08 PM
  #1461  
Zeus
Rennlist Member
 
Zeus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Washington State
Posts: 382
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Guest89
Probably way too early for anything 100% definitive from the manufacturer; Georg Kacher is likely the best connected journalist (who writes for English-speaking audiences anyway).
Thank you.

Originally Posted by TRAKCAR
A million dollars. At least.



Did AP quit?



Its invaluable.
Not sure. Would hate to see him go because of the GT3 issue.

Originally Posted by Petevb
I strongly suspect that you'll either get normally aspirated with hybrid or turbo, but not normally aspirated alone, and probably not manual transmissions. It seems a question of when, not if. If I get a chance I will certainly ask...
I thought about asking you first actually, but didn't want to be a bother... Thank you, if you do. It would certainly make for an 'excellent' article, I think.

Originally Posted by Nizer
Bear in mind that there's lots of flexibility built into meeting CAFE standards. See here for more details: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corpora...e_Fuel_Economy

Among the options, Porsche could always opt to pay the penalty for the relatively low-production run GT3 series and pass it on to buyer. This is a pretty small hit under today's rules:

"Currently, the CAFE penalty is $55 USD per vehicle for every 1 mpg under the standard. For the year 2006 Mercedes-Benz drew a $30.3 million penalty for violating fuel economy standards by 2.2 MPG,[89] or $122 per vehicle.[90] According to the government "fueleconomy.gov" website violating CAFE by 2.42 MPG means consuming extra 27 barrels (4.3 m3) (1,134 US gallons (4,290 L)) of mostly imported fuel in 10 years which is worth $3,490 (Based on 45% highway, 55% city driving, 15,000 annual miles and a fuel price of $2.95 per gallon) that is 13.4% more and also it means emitting extra 14 Tons of CO2 in 10 years that is 12.7% more. These numbers are based on comparison of 2010 Mercedes ML 350 4MATIC with CAFE Unadjusted Average Fuel Economy of 21.64 MPG (this model meets 2006 CAFE requirements of 21.6 MPG) and 2010 Mercedes ML 550 4MATIC with CAFE Unadjusted Average Fuel Economy of 19.22 MPG.[91] So consuming extra $3,490 worth of mostly imported fuel and emitting extra 14 Tons of CO2 draws a penalty of only $122 for a single luxury car buyer. $122 is only 0.3% of the price of $40,000 car (average 2010 price of a luxury car). Several experts stated that this is not enough of a monetary incentive to comply with CAFE.[88]"

I don't think that's the route Porsche will go as it's pretty clear they're keen to embrace hybrid technology as evidenced by the GT3 R Hybrid, 918 and the 919. On this front I expect to see hybrid technology eventually make it's way into the GT3 series. I'm less convinced regarding the adoption of turbocharging, at least for the next five years. It goes against the GT3 ethos and also encroaches on 911 Turbo territory.
Agree 100%. Great info.


Originally Posted by CAlexio
Hybrid is more benign than turbo in my gearhead mind. You can use hybrid to augment or torque fill a power curve, while turbo mangles it. Hybrid also doesn't kill exhaust sound like a turbo does by killing the engine's distinct sounds and turning everything into a generic whoosh. If hybrid power can come from a lighter source than batteries (an inertia wheel like on the gt3 hybrid car from a few years back) then the future isn't so dark.

I just really really dislike turbos.
McLaren P1, 650S, pretty much any V8 'Benz that is turbo'd sounds great. Although not as great as a 9,000 rpm NA engine.

Originally Posted by Mike in CA
The issue with hybrids is weight; batteries and electric motors are heavy.
+1 & fixed it for you.

Originally Posted by JasonAndreas
Penalities for failing to meet CAFE standards are just a cost of business for Porsche. And while I'm sure they always do what they can to reduce payments, they have always been fined and absolutely will not allow the fear of penalties to dictate the total direction of their engine programs.


Code:
1985 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $1,253,580.00 Jul-87 IP
1986 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $823,440.00 Feb-89 IP
1987 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $948,480.00 Jun-89
1988 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $1,048,905.00 May-90
1989 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $1,875,125.00 May-90
1990 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $2,033,770.00 Jul-91
1991 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $1,871,470.00 Feb-94
1992 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $781,575.00 Feb-94
1993 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $668,500.00 Oct-94
1994 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $804,600.00 Dec-96
1995 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $1,949,520.00 Dec-96
1996 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $2,127,600.00 Nov-98
1997 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $2,525,820.00 Nov-98
1998 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $1,613,865.00 Mar-00 
1999 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $4,884,627.00 Jul-00
2000 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $3,720,816.00 Jun-01
2001 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $4,997,190.00 Aug-02
2002 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $4,357,782.00 Mar-04 
2003 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $3,348,609.00 Dec-04
2003 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $189,634.50 Dec-04 
2004 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $3,225,453.00 Jun-05
2004 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $3,171,564.00 Jun-05
2005 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $2,238,082.00 Aug-06
2005 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $1,977,250.00 Aug-06
2006 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $3,010,518.50 Aug-07
2006 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $1,589,346.00 Aug-07
2007 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $1,237,500.00 Jul-08
2008 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $1,143,994.50 Dec-09
2008 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $2,584,587.50 Dec-09
2009 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $1,487,145.00 Oct-10
2010 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $1,121,373.00 Nov-11
2010 Porsche Cars North America, Inc. $656,370.00 Nov-11
This gives me hope and makes my day. Porsche, I'll pay the penalty. Pass it on.
Old 08-06-2014, 04:47 PM
  #1462  
GrantG
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
GrantG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Denver
Posts: 17,771
Received 4,721 Likes on 2,691 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Macca
I have no info on GT4. based on your source I would suspect sub 400 bhp headline power.
The 991 current sports 3 different 3.8L motors making 400, 430, and 475hp. No need to be so pessimistic to think the detuned motor is the least of these (I'm personally told it's the middle one, but we'll see evenyually). "PDK-S only" is the worst of the rumors I've heard recently and likely a deal-killer for me
Old 08-06-2014, 04:57 PM
  #1463  
Larry Cable
Rennlist Member
 
Larry Cable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: S.F Bay Area
Posts: 25,540
Received 3,443 Likes on 2,250 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GrantG
The 991 current sports 3 different 3.8L motors making 400, 430, and 475hp. No need to be so pessimistic to think the detuned motor is the least of these (I'm personally told it's the middle one, but we'll see evenyually). "PDK-S only" is the worst of the rumors I've heard recently and likely a deal-killer for me
sigh that is disappointing news... 430bhp in a Cayman would *rock* and I suspect might even (oh oh) out perform the current GT3?
Old 08-06-2014, 05:03 PM
  #1464  
hf1
Rennlist Member
 
hf1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Northeast
Posts: 10,392
Likes: 0
Received 1,639 Likes on 1,122 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JasonAndreas
Penalities for failing to meet CAFE standards are just a cost of business for Porsche. And while I'm sure they always do what they can to reduce payments, they have always been fined and absolutely will not allow the fear of penalties to dictate the total direction of their engine programs.
If they focused their engineering efforts on making their GT cars lighter instead of adding more HP, nannies, PDKs, and batteries they may have ended up paying less or even no penalties on what would be better cars to boot.
Old 08-06-2014, 05:16 PM
  #1465  
Zucc
Burning Brakes
 
Zucc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Southeast, USA
Posts: 966
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

They still have some room to tweak the Gt3 without going to hybrid or turbos. They could make 7th gear an overdrive, which would probably be more useful 90% of the time for street use. The could also put on the silly stop start feature to pick up an extra mile or two. Fortunately, that feature is easily disabled.
Old 08-06-2014, 05:31 PM
  #1466  
GrantG
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
GrantG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Denver
Posts: 17,771
Received 4,721 Likes on 2,691 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Larry Cable
430bhp in a Cayman would *rock* and I suspect might even (oh oh) out perform the current GT3?
No, X51 redlines at 7800rpm, 1200 sooner than GT3 and has 10% less power before slight detuning. Extra power and better gearing will ensure the GT3's dominance, not to mention facelift 991.2 GT3 coming soon with even more juice.
Old 08-06-2014, 05:57 PM
  #1467  
markow
Racer
 
markow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 4forme
I have heard March as well. It was originally going to be Oct but the engine replacements moved it back.
my allocation said november but now it says march on it, delivery a bit later.
i still hope for presentation in paris this fall.
peter
Old 08-06-2014, 07:21 PM
  #1468  
Guest89
Drifting
 
Guest89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: CHI / ATL
Posts: 2,793
Received 198 Likes on 116 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GrantG
No, X51 redlines at 7800rpm, 1200 sooner than GT3 and has 10% less power before slight detuning. Extra power and better gearing will ensure the GT3's dominance, not to mention facelift 991.2 GT3 coming soon with even more juice.
Soon?

2017 or so, right?
Old 08-06-2014, 07:41 PM
  #1469  
Mike in CA
Race Director
 
Mike in CA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: North Bay Area, CA
Posts: 11,969
Received 127 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TRAKCAR
Did AP quit?
Originally Posted by Zeus
Not sure. Would hate to see him go because of the GT3 issue.
I "think" TRACKCAR was being facetious, but in any case, no he definitely did not.
Old 08-06-2014, 07:43 PM
  #1470  
0Q991
Drifting
 
0Q991's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,743
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mike in CA
I "think" TRACKCAR was being facetious, but in any case, no he definitely did not.
That's good to hear, Mike!


Quick Reply: Consolidated 991RS thread



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:24 PM.