Notices
964 Forum 1989-1994
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Singer's really ramping up production

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-25-2017, 05:30 PM
  #91  
Marine Blue
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Marine Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 16,020
Received 807 Likes on 469 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Porschenut_Lee
This thread is really demotivating me to sell my car........... I have been procrastinating for months now because it’s such an emotional decision to sell one of these, especially with pictures of all these Singer donor cars being posted. I know it will be tough to get back into another 964 C2 in the future, and I’ve put a lot of love into this one. All I can do is try my best to make sure my car doesn’t end up in that lot and that it goes to another 964 enthusiast instead of becoming a Singer.
Why would you sell it, keep it and enjoy it! These cares are immensely fun to drive and with so many being bought to be backdated they’re getting just as rare as a Singer!
Old 11-26-2017, 10:02 AM
  #92  
Porschenut_Lee
Rennlist Member
 
Porschenut_Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 668
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Talking

Originally Posted by Marine Blue
Why would you sell it, keep it and enjoy it! These cares are immensely fun to drive and with so many being bought to be backdated they’re getting just as rare as a Singer!
Adding living space to house for kid #3........can’t responsibly go into debt for an addition when I have a toy that would pay for a large chunk of the cost. Believe me......I’ve spent the entire summer trying to justify keeping the car. As you can see I’ve done well so far since we are approaching December and I still have it
Old 11-28-2017, 01:29 PM
  #93  
misterbeverlyhills
Rennlist Member
 
misterbeverlyhills's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 912
Received 225 Likes on 132 Posts
Default

Just guessing but once 964 donor cars become harder to find, and seeing as Singer is now building their own motors with Williams; would Singer not then be able to take 3.2s and SCs as donors for the backdate look? Are the shells that different?
Old 11-28-2017, 01:52 PM
  #94  
Porschenut_Lee
Rennlist Member
 
Porschenut_Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 668
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by misterbeverlyhills
Just guessing but once 964 donor cars become harder to find, and seeing as Singer is now building their own motors with Williams; would Singer not then be able to take 3.2s and SCs as donors for the backdate look? Are the shells that different?
Biggest thing would be suspension I am guessing, as well as interference for mounting G50 gearbox in 915 cars.
Old 11-28-2017, 01:59 PM
  #95  
911Jetta
Rennlist Member
 
911Jetta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: NC
Posts: 7,214
Received 486 Likes on 279 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by misterbeverlyhills
Just guessing but once 964 donor cars become harder to find, and seeing as Singer is now building their own motors with Williams; would Singer not then be able to take 3.2s and SCs as donors for the backdate look? Are the shells that different?
Singer used those older platforms on the earliest cars.... then switched to the 964 shell.
The 964s platform was a total redesign to accommodate coil over suspension, ABS, new crash protection requirements, airbags, 4-wheel drive, etc. (more rigid platform, etc.)
Old 11-28-2017, 02:30 PM
  #96  
misterbeverlyhills
Rennlist Member
 
misterbeverlyhills's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 912
Received 225 Likes on 132 Posts
Default

I'll bet they have a ton of D90s and other interesting wheels for sale. I need some Cobalt interior parts, anyone know how to reach them for that, is there someone selling off the parts they cast off?

I am told they pay $35k for a solid donor, sight unseen.
Old 11-28-2017, 02:44 PM
  #97  
911Jetta
Rennlist Member
 
911Jetta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: NC
Posts: 7,214
Received 486 Likes on 279 Posts
Default

Testing continues!

Old 11-28-2017, 04:56 PM
  #98  
cobalt
Rennlist Member
 
cobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 22,607
Received 2,181 Likes on 1,305 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 911Jetta
Singer used those older platforms on the earliest cars.... then switched to the 964 shell.
The 964s platform was a total redesign to accommodate coil over suspension, ABS, new crash protection requirements, airbags, 4-wheel drive, etc. (more rigid platform, etc.)
The only advantage to the earlier tubs is they are lighter. The improved design and torsional rigidity of the 964/993 tubs is considerably superior to the older cars. The 964 is the only tailing arm tub worth modifying with limited need to rework the entire tub and has enough newer technology that can be reworked or retained to achieve what they are building.. Also crashworthiness of the older tubs isn't close although they seem to be omitting airbags and the impact bars used on the 964/993. I have an issue with that. They are making these lighter and faster and IMO less safe. ABS appears to be the only safety aspect retained. Bigger brakes help but not in an accident and CF shatters.

A 2700 pound 964 with 350hp or so to the wheels is more car than most would need to have fun or even begin to explore its limits. Add 350 torque and it would be a monster but I have not seen torque curves for these engines and to me torque is equally as important as HP.

I guess when the 964 tubs are used up they stop production or start chopping up 993's. Although I don't see the kinematic rear suspension of the 993 as a substitute as they loose that trailing arm feel which is what a backdate IMO should have.
Old 11-29-2017, 10:43 AM
  #99  
J richard
Rennlist Member
 
J richard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,651
Received 43 Likes on 32 Posts
Default

They are looking in the wrong direction, should look at the 99-04c2. The 996 gt3 is basically an evolution of the 964 with water cooled heads/jackets, the transaxle and engine case are basically the same.

They need to to cut some of them up and apply the same technique and air cooled engine package. More room for that engine (that is really not fitting in the 964 anymore), way more room for rubber, surprisingly similar lines, multi link rear suspension and nobody is going to cry if you start cutting up 99-04 C2s with ims failures.....
Old 11-29-2017, 02:45 PM
  #100  
Matt Andrews
Rennlist Member
 
Matt Andrews's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 637
Received 72 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

I would suspect that the supply won't dry up enough for it to make a real impact for a long time. Even if these cars double in value, an additional $35-40k in material cost is only a 5-10% change of pricing if they simply pass all that on to customers.
Old 11-29-2017, 03:02 PM
  #101  
Vandit
Nordschleife Master
 
Vandit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 5,614
Likes: 0
Received 48 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

I still don't understand why Singer didn't use the 993 platform for their new Williams collaboration build. The new car is super engineered, cutting edge power plant, modern aero, etc. All that stuff would be better paired with the 993's superior rear suspension package.
Old 11-29-2017, 03:13 PM
  #102  
Matt Andrews
Rennlist Member
 
Matt Andrews's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 637
Received 72 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

how much of the "new" car is really new? I assume the interior Jigs and other components are a carry over with just a different engine and "body kit"? If so, moving to the 993 probably could have incurred a lot of additional expense. OR the fact that the 993 is OBD2 and will have more emissions issues could be a key determining factor...
Old 11-29-2017, 03:48 PM
  #103  
wallra
Pro
 
wallra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
Received 59 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

Thats what I'm thinking also. You start getting into OBD2 cars the the emission laws change.
Old 11-29-2017, 07:33 PM
  #104  
Jjm4life
Three Wheelin'
 
Jjm4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,496
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by wallra
Thats what I'm thinking also. You start getting into OBD2 cars the the emission laws change.
I think you nailed it.
Old 11-30-2017, 12:58 PM
  #105  
Vandit
Nordschleife Master
 
Vandit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 5,614
Likes: 0
Received 48 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

You can get a '95 993 and it is OBD1, however it won't be a 25yo car until 2020. 25yo is the age where cars start to fall off of the inspection and titling rigor of modern car registration and can be registered as a "classic" or "antique" automobile.


Quick Reply: Singer's really ramping up production



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:20 AM.