my 3L dyno
#33
Drifting
I don't know about your cylinder head but Lindsey racing stage 3 2.5L 8v head will flow just over 250cfm intake. A 2.7 head flows 263 stock and a ported 16v head can reach 350 cfm intake. Your cylinder head is the weak link is what I'm saying if you want more power, regardless of the porting and big valves. Your head will probably produce near the same power on a 2.5L with a matched turbo but not as nice of a power curve as you have. But you have a 3.0 with a ported/big valve 2.5 8v head which I would say you maxed out with 91 octane fuel. A smaller turbo would move that power curve down a bit. I would find a 2.7 head and send it to LR to work it over. You need more CFM flow in the cylinder head if you want more power and you could bring that boost down some. The 968 turbo rs has about the same power that you have and they use a stock 2.7 head. If you port a 2.7 head the flow will dramatically increase because it's already a big intake port head. You would need to modify the water port (LR could probably do that) and use 951 exaust valves or have LR work that side over too. George D I believe said he used white lighting ceramic coating on the inside of the exhaust ports on his 2.7 head to help aid with the heat so that maybe something to look into or ask him. Also did you get Alberts 2.5" header/crossover? That helps with exhaust back pressure if you already have a big turbo and exhaust from the turbo out. That's just what I see. It's an air pump and the head CFM flow is the major factor. I bet with a 2.7 head with a port and polish with modified water port would realy show what that 3.0 could put down. But with your ported/big valve 2.5 head your about maxed out IMO.
#34
Rainman
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
I don't know about your cylinder head but Lindsey racing stage 3 2.5L 8v head will flow just over 250cfm intake. A 2.7 head flows 263 stock and a ported 16v head can reach 350 cfm intake. Your cylinder head is the weak link is what I'm saying if you want more power, regardless of the porting and big valves. Your head will probably produce near the same power on a 2.5L with a matched turbo but not as nice of a power curve as you have. But you have a 3.0 with a ported/big valve 2.5 8v head which I would say you maxed out with 91 octane fuel. A smaller turbo would move that power curve down a bit. I would find a 2.7 head and send it to LR to work it over. You need more CFM flow in the cylinder head if you want more power and you could bring that boost down some. The 968 turbo rs has about the same power that you have and they use a stock 2.7 head. If you port a 2.7 head the flow will dramatically increase because it's already a big intake port head. You would need to modify the water port (LR could probably do that) and use 951 exaust valves or have LR work that side over too. George D I believe said he used white lighting ceramic coating on the inside of the exhaust ports on his 2.7 head to help aid with the heat so that maybe something to look into or ask him. Also did you get Alberts 2.5" header/crossover? That helps with exhaust back pressure if you already have a big turbo and exhaust from the turbo out. That's just what I see. It's an air pump and the head CFM flow is the major factor. I bet with a 2.7 head with a port and polish with modified water port would realy show what that 3.0 could put down. But with your ported/big valve 2.5 head your about maxed out IMO.
Also, the 968 turbo used what was essentially a 944T head made to fit the 3.0 block (like what Lindsey does)...968T head had 944T-size intake ports and small exhaust ports.
Surely user 968TurboS (Raj) will be along soon, as he has some Rennlist alarm that goes off when people talk about the 968T, and he can set us all straight.
Dear Mr. Brown...I wonder what the graph would look like with the stock intake manifold back on it.
#35
Pro
here are the mods..
flanged steel sleeved block w/ negative o-ring
88mm crank
104mm bore
forged pistions and rods
alberts "RACE" Cam
6262 with billet wheel
ported head and bigger intake valves
tial 44mm wg
lindsey 3 inch all the way back
race springs and reatainers
Intake manifold made by albert
SPR front mount
EBC
Electromotive tec s
1600cc injectors for e 85 later on
flanged steel sleeved block w/ negative o-ring
88mm crank
104mm bore
forged pistions and rods
alberts "RACE" Cam
6262 with billet wheel
ported head and bigger intake valves
tial 44mm wg
lindsey 3 inch all the way back
race springs and reatainers
Intake manifold made by albert
SPR front mount
EBC
Electromotive tec s
1600cc injectors for e 85 later on
#36
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NY
Posts: 1,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#37
Drifting
I think those quoted flow numbers are pretty optimistic, based on other people's projects shared on here not getting those results on heavily worked heads.
Also, the 968 turbo used what was essentially a 944T head made to fit the 3.0 block (like what Lindsey does)...968T head had 944T-size intake ports and small exhaust ports.
Surely user 968TurboS (Raj) will be along soon, as he has some Rennlist alarm that goes off when people talk about the 968T, and he can set us all straight.
Dear Mr. Brown...I wonder what the graph would look like with the stock intake manifold back on it.
Also, the 968 turbo used what was essentially a 944T head made to fit the 3.0 block (like what Lindsey does)...968T head had 944T-size intake ports and small exhaust ports.
Surely user 968TurboS (Raj) will be along soon, as he has some Rennlist alarm that goes off when people talk about the 968T, and he can set us all straight.
Dear Mr. Brown...I wonder what the graph would look like with the stock intake manifold back on it.
And I totally forgot about the intercooler, that is very true. I was focused on the long block, exhaust and turbo. And I was thinking if the intake manifold was custom then the intercooler would have been addressed with an updated unit as well.
He beat me to my post, he does have a FMIC.
#43
Pro
Not a fan of the intake manifold design. It doesn't take into account the pressure waves bouncing back and forth. In this design, the pressure waves basically go off in different directions instead of traveling back down the runners.
Edit: And, the plenum is enormous. Great for top end, but I'm really curious about how that would affect throttle response in normal driving situations.
Edit: And, the plenum is enormous. Great for top end, but I'm really curious about how that would affect throttle response in normal driving situations.
Last edited by jmj951; 12-11-2015 at 01:26 AM.
#44
Rennlist Member
Nor of the air filter position. Be an idea to check out that vented LH light cover if you're going to leave it there. And/or some hood vents to encourage some underhood flow.