Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

My car crushing lap record on Swedens no 1 track

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-09-2014, 06:51 AM
  #91  
Duke
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
Duke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 5,552
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

"Upgrading" from a GTX turbo? Hmmm I'm veeery sceptical From what I've seen of the Precision internal parts they cannot be compared to a GT/GTX turbo. And I won't go over 750 hp so I will stay with this turbo
Old 07-09-2014, 07:12 AM
  #92  
Duke
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
Duke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 5,552
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Olli Snellman
Gustaf,
any chance to see you & car at the Finnish tracks this summer ?
It will be difficult to get that into my calendar this summer. Would be fun to do it at some point!
Old 07-09-2014, 03:04 PM
  #93  
URG8RB8
Drifting
 
URG8RB8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Bangkok, Thailand, Milpitas, CA & Weeki Wachee, FL
Posts: 2,239
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Gustaf:

I am getting ready to order my GTX3582, with Tial V-Band turbine housing. You are using the 1.03 A/R housing correct? Since my car is more for the street, I was thinking maybe the optional smaller compressor housing might be better for my application. It can be ordered with a GT3076R T04E frame 4" inlet, 2" outlet with built in anti surge compressor housing. Any thoughts/opinions?
Old 07-10-2014, 04:05 AM
  #94  
Thom
Race Car
 
Thom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,329
Received 41 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

GTX3582R will be way too large on a 2.5 engine.
Old 07-10-2014, 04:15 AM
  #95  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,924
Received 97 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

Thom, Eric has a big bore motor in the works but I am of the opinion that while you could run that turbo easily enough, I would opt for a bit smaller for a 3Lt road car. Maybe the GT3076 or GTX3076. You would know more than me but I think the 'X' series turbos seem to want to be boosted quite high. I'd like to try my old GT3076.82 on a 3Lt motor.
Old 07-10-2014, 04:26 AM
  #96  
Thom
Race Car
 
Thom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,329
Received 41 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

Ah ok, a GTX35 should be ok then.

I have been back in the ghetto of mid range debauchery... errr I mean been running the stock intake again since last week end (the short intake is momentarily needed for some "side project"...) and intend to run 1.5 bar again on the GTX3076R 1.06. Curious to see if I start to blow the HG like you do.
Old 07-10-2014, 04:44 AM
  #97  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,924
Received 97 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

Keep me in the loop on your findings. We are picking up my block tomorrow after the O ringing. Going to have to wait until next week for the new gasket. Really wonder what the GTX35 will be like at 1.8 bar...(read eek...car is pretty fast already at 1.3bar !)
Old 07-10-2014, 04:50 AM
  #98  
Thom
Race Car
 
Thom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,329
Received 41 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

I believe that increasing boost without improving head flow will only put further strain on the short block. You may solve the hg issue on the medium term but over the long term you may damage something else.
I ran 1.6 bar the other day and even if I got no knock thanks to the opened up cam I could still feel a boost level past which the overall breathing ability of the engine decreased, which I'm pretty sure is caused by the flow limits of the head and/or stock headers.

Our respective set ups are I think comparable, even if yours sits of course on a higher level, so I would suggest not going too wild too early with the boost...

Last edited by Thom; 07-10-2014 at 05:15 AM.
Old 07-10-2014, 05:23 AM
  #99  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,924
Received 97 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

No, we will be very careful. I'm sure you're right re the stock inlet. We will look at what it looks like on the data. We'd only consider running higher boost down the straight in a bigger event. No use on short tighter tracks.

Be interested when Gustaf runs up a bit more boost on his car though??
Old 07-10-2014, 05:28 AM
  #100  
Thom
Race Car
 
Thom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,329
Received 41 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

Agreed... want to see more than just exhaust parts popping out
Old 07-10-2014, 08:27 AM
  #101  
Duke
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
Duke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 5,552
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

The GTX3582R is really a 750 hp capable turbo and too big for most applications. But with a big displacement engine in a race car that mostly runs between 4500-7500 rpm it's a very good choice.

Patrick I wouldn't say it seems to like higher boost better than e.g. the GT3582R. But given it's a "larger" turbo it's more efficient at higher flow (e.g. higher boost) than the GT so it can feel that way.
Old 07-10-2014, 08:41 AM
  #102  
refresh951
Rennlist Member
 
refresh951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Marietta, Georgia
Posts: 3,365
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Duke
The GTX3582R is really a 750 hp capable turbo and too big for most applications. But with a big displacement engine in a race car that mostly runs between 4500-7500 rpm it's a very good choice.

Patrick I wouldn't say it seems to like higher boost better than e.g. the GT3582R. But given it's a "larger" turbo it's more efficient at higher flow (e.g. higher boost) than the GT so it can feel that way.
Eric's motor will be significantly bigger than 3.0L
Old 07-10-2014, 05:31 PM
  #103  
URG8RB8
Drifting
 
URG8RB8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Bangkok, Thailand, Milpitas, CA & Weeki Wachee, FL
Posts: 2,239
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Finally got the RL App back up and running. Not sure what happened but have not been able to log on for quite a while. My engine will be 3.3L minimum, but hopefully 3.5L. However, I am not looking for a screamer. I will be perfectly happy shifting at 6-6.5K. Looking more for down low torque, which I feel I will have more than enough of. This will not be a track car, just a obnoxiously fast daily driver. Well, if it holds together. Any opinions on which compressor housing to use?
Old 07-10-2014, 05:59 PM
  #104  
Duke
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
Duke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 5,552
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

That's a big motor But to determine turbo size I would also take desired maximum boost, head, camshaft, headers and intake into consideration on top of max rpm. To use the GTX3582R with a smaller compressor housing would seem a bit counter productive to me. I would run a smaller turbo and likely have a quicker car.
Old 07-10-2014, 06:01 PM
  #105  
refresh951
Rennlist Member
 
refresh951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Marietta, Georgia
Posts: 3,365
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by URG8RB8
Any opinions on which compressor housing to use?
Start a thread (build thread) and we can discuss. I have some input.


Quick Reply: My car crushing lap record on Swedens no 1 track



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:14 PM.