Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

turbo sizing help

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-29-2014, 01:16 AM
  #1  
sl2ner
Track Day
Thread Starter
 
sl2ner's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question turbo sizing help

hey guys im in the middle of a 2.5 turbo build and im stuck between 2 turbos. most of its time will be driven on the street but will also see a lot of the drag strip and possibly a few road courses. looking to make around 500 whp. some of the supporting mods are....

-2.5 block .40 over
-JE 8.5:1 .40 over pistons
-carillo H-beam rods
-ARP head studs and rod nuts
-large oil cooler
-lindsey racing intake manifold and big TB
-lindsey valve springs
-titanium retainers
-272 cam
-port and polished head
-lindsey solid lifter package
-speed force racing blow through MAF
-#72 injectors
-speed force racing fuel system(pump, rail, and reg.)
-speed force racing turbo and cross over manifold
-3 inch down pipe connected to straight 3 inch out the back

the two turbos in question are both turbonetics GT-K series turbos, the 550 and the 650. the 550 is a 61mm turbo and has a .82 a/r exhaust housing and the 650 is a 66mm turbo with a .63 a/r exhaust housing. problem is im thinking the .82 a/r on the 550 might lag too much and im thinking the 66mm compressor side on the 650 might be too big and come in contact with the bottom of the intake. if both of these are going to be too laggy im probably going to go with the precision 6262 but one of the gt-k turbos would be nice since i got a deal on them.

so can any of you big HP guys help me sort out my delima? any help or advice on the project is much appreciated!

Last edited by sl2ner; 05-29-2014 at 03:50 AM.
Old 05-29-2014, 01:24 AM
  #2  
Paulyy
Professional Hoon
Rennlist Member
 
Paulyy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 7,090
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I did look into those turbos a few years ago. Because not many people use them here, you should search what the WRX guys with the 2.5 are getting. you'll have some indication of boost curves and power outputs.

From what i've been told, they are quite laggy turbos to begin with. But if i had to choose. the 650 will be the one. Because i don't have compressor maps to read and not sure how much boost you're planning on, you'll get a better chance with a 650 and running higher boost.
Old 05-29-2014, 01:24 AM
  #3  
xxxabc123
1st Gear
 
xxxabc123's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hi Friends,

I am new here , according to me you must see any expert person in the related
field.

------------------------------

Top Ten classified website
Old 05-29-2014, 04:52 AM
  #4  
sl2ner
Track Day
Thread Starter
 
sl2ner's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

haha ya ive been looking at the subby guys and the others running similar displacement engines. thinking i might run a precision 5858. seems like the perfect match for these cars and can support a little over 500hp.
Old 05-29-2014, 05:49 AM
  #5  
Paulyy
Professional Hoon
Rennlist Member
 
Paulyy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 7,090
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

500 rwhp has been done on a gt3076R before
His head and cam where pretty wild. just a little milder than mine IICR (same builder)

https://rennlist.com/forums/944-turb...oppin-***.html
Old 05-29-2014, 06:01 AM
  #6  
Penguinracer
Rennlist Member
 
Penguinracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: London, UK
Posts: 597
Likes: 0
Received 46 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

A quick question.

Why did you decide to go with a re-bore/alusil etch rather steel/nikasil liners?

Tim
Old 05-29-2014, 06:31 AM
  #7  
Thom
Race Car
 
Thom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,329
Received 41 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

Looking at the spec sheet for both turbos I would suggest the 550.
The 650 uses a smaller A/R turbine housing, and even if we suppose it flows more than the 550's larger A/R turbine housing/smaller turbine wheel (which I doubt), the larger compressor wheel of the 650 suggests you may get a peakier but narrower powerband.

Originally Posted by Paulyy
500 rwhp has been done on a gt3076R before
If Patrick in OZ makes 500 actual whp with a GTX3582R, a much-prepped head and 1.5 bar of boost, I do not see how it would be possible to get anywhere close with a GT3076R.
Old 05-29-2014, 08:03 AM
  #8  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,916
Received 96 Likes on 79 Posts
Default

Our numbers have been proven to be upside down in Australia...fact!
Old 05-29-2014, 08:51 AM
  #9  
Paulyy
Professional Hoon
Rennlist Member
 
Paulyy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 7,090
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Thom
Looking at the spec sheet for both turbos I would suggest the 550.
The 650 uses a smaller A/R turbine housing, and even if we suppose it flows more than the 550's larger A/R turbine housing/smaller turbine wheel (which I doubt), the larger compressor wheel of the 650 suggests you may get a peakier but narrower powerband.



If Patrick in OZ makes 500 actual whp with a GTX3582R, a much-prepped head and 1.5 bar of boost, I do not see how it would be possible to get anywhere close with a GT3076R.
Well i don't know how much the us dynos lie, but if you look at the link from spooln51s car, he dynos just under 500rwhp with a gt3076r after he has increased the boost. mind you this was at 7000 rpm he was getting these numbers.
Old 05-29-2014, 09:10 AM
  #10  
gruhsy
Drifting
 
gruhsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Calgary
Posts: 2,559
Received 51 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

The air turns the other way which is aided by the curvature of the turbo

Originally Posted by 333pg333
Our numbers have been proven to be upside down in Australia...fact!
Old 05-29-2014, 09:14 AM
  #11  
Thom
Race Car
 
Thom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,329
Received 41 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

Well, I just do not trust US dynos.
With "high hp" engines the error factor increases with the output of the engine.
Old 05-29-2014, 12:16 PM
  #12  
Paulyy
Professional Hoon
Rennlist Member
 
Paulyy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 7,090
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Thom
Well, I just do not trust US dynos.
With "high hp" engines the error factor increases with the output of the engine.
I get your point.

Well looking at the gt30R compressor map, he would have been pushing it at it's limit to get "actual" 500rwhp. 23-25 psi = 1.5 - 1.7 bar = 2.5-2.7 absolute. Which is right on the ballpark on the map at it's limits.

He shouldn't have a problem with the GTX3076R though. at 25 psi you'll get 60 lbs/min which would be on par with the goals.
Just hope the head will flow enough air.

George D Ran a GTK 650. Looking at videos and the dyno by SFR it looked very laggy indeed. IICR he mentioned it too and swapped it out for something with more midrange. that was on a 3.1
Old 05-29-2014, 05:18 PM
  #13  
sl2ner
Track Day
Thread Starter
 
sl2ner's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Penguinracer
A quick question.

Why did you decide to go with a re-bore/alusil etch rather steel/nikasil liners?

Tim
read there were problems with certain steel motors so i decided to just stay with alusil. didnt seem like there would be any problems other than actually finding someone to do the machine work with alusil.

Originally Posted by Thom
Looking at the spec sheet for both turbos I would suggest the 550.
The 650 uses a smaller A/R turbine housing, and even if we suppose it flows more than the 550's larger A/R turbine housing/smaller turbine wheel (which I doubt), the larger compressor wheel of the 650 suggests you may get a peakier but narrower powerband.



If Patrick in OZ makes 500 actual whp with a GTX3582R, a much-prepped head and 1.5 bar of boost, I do not see how it would be possible to get anywhere close with a GT3076R.
ya these gt-ks seem like they might be too laggy for this project. thinking about running either a 5858 or s 6262 from precision. would like the 6262 but if im only revving the 6.5k it might not be the best choice.

Originally Posted by Paulyy
I get your point.

Well looking at the gt30R compressor map, he would have been pushing it at it's limit to get "actual" 500rwhp. 23-25 psi = 1.5 - 1.7 bar = 2.5-2.7 absolute. Which is right on the ballpark on the map at it's limits.

He shouldn't have a problem with the GTX3076R though. at 25 psi you'll get 60 lbs/min which would be on par with the goals.
Just hope the head will flow enough air.

George D Ran a GTK 650. Looking at videos and the dyno by SFR it looked very laggy indeed. IICR he mentioned it too and swapped it out for something with more midrange. that was on a 3.1
ya i did a lot of research around george d's red car using the gt-k 650 but didnt come up with a whole lot of info, just some basic specs. but i did see as your stated that he changed the turbo out but i didnt know the reasoning. figured it might be the lag.
Old 05-29-2014, 05:19 PM
  #14  
sl2ner
Track Day
Thread Starter
 
sl2ner's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

decided to go with some precision but still stuck between a couple turbos. the 5858 seems like probably the best choice but wouldnt mind the bigger 6262 if it would work with this application.
Old 05-29-2014, 09:43 PM
  #15  
blown 944
Race Car
 
blown 944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Firestone, Colorado
Posts: 4,826
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Id go 62 62. I don't trust us dynos either. Only trap speeds.

500 hp is not going to be easy with a 2.5

What are the head flow numbers?

Your injectors are also going to be too small.


Quick Reply: turbo sizing help



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:17 AM.