turbo sizing help
#17
Professional Hoon
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 7,090
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
http://fuelinjectorclinic.com/flow-calculator
Cylinders: 4
Fuel pressure: 3bar fpr + boost (25 psi) = 68psi
Engine aspiration: Turbo charged
Horsepower: wheels
Duty cycle: 90
#19
Race Car
#20
Race Car
I doubt that.
http://fuelinjectorclinic.com/flow-calculator
Cylinders: 4
Fuel pressure: 3bar fpr + boost (25 psi) = 68psi
Engine aspiration: Turbo charged
Horsepower: wheels
Duty cycle: 90
http://fuelinjectorclinic.com/flow-calculator
Cylinders: 4
Fuel pressure: 3bar fpr + boost (25 psi) = 68psi
Engine aspiration: Turbo charged
Horsepower: wheels
Duty cycle: 90
#21
I doubt that.
http://fuelinjectorclinic.com/flow-calculator
Cylinders: 4
Fuel pressure: 3bar fpr + boost (25 psi) = 68psi
Engine aspiration: Turbo charged
Horsepower: wheels
Duty cycle: 90
http://fuelinjectorclinic.com/flow-calculator
Cylinders: 4
Fuel pressure: 3bar fpr + boost (25 psi) = 68psi
Engine aspiration: Turbo charged
Horsepower: wheels
Duty cycle: 90
458hp with #72
415hp with #48
463hp with #55
479hp with #72
461hp with #55
401hp with #48
416hp with #55
5 of these are still 2.5L as well so why cant i make the same power as these guys with the same or better supporting mods?
#23
Race Car
It's not really a rising rate FPR. It's 1-1
When dealing with pressure, it's about the pressure differential. The MAP cancels out the added pressure.
Imagine 0/0 nothing comes out. Same happens when 25/25. The base pressure is the only real pressure.
A rising rate uses a different rate ie 2:1 etc
When dealing with pressure, it's about the pressure differential. The MAP cancels out the added pressure.
Imagine 0/0 nothing comes out. Same happens when 25/25. The base pressure is the only real pressure.
A rising rate uses a different rate ie 2:1 etc
#24
Professional Hoon
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 7,090
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
on lindsey racings dyno page they have the following results with injectors...
458hp with #72
415hp with #48
463hp with #55
479hp with #72
461hp with #55
401hp with #48
416hp with #55
5 of these are still 2.5L as well so why cant i make the same power as these guys with the same or better supporting mods?
458hp with #72
415hp with #48
463hp with #55
479hp with #72
461hp with #55
401hp with #48
416hp with #55
5 of these are still 2.5L as well so why cant i make the same power as these guys with the same or better supporting mods?
it's not about the supporting mods with choosing injectors.
Injectors can only give you so much fuel. with so much fuel, you get only so much power. or you'll just run out of injector
#25
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist
Small Business Partner
Rennlist Member
Rennlist
Small Business Partner
I.E. At 0psi of boost, the fuel pressure is, say, 43psi. The injectors have 0psi on one side, and 43psi on the other. So the pressure drop across the injectors is 43-0=43psi.
At 10psi of boost, the fuel pressure is 43+10=53psi. The injectors see 10psi on one side, and 53psi on the other. So the pressure drop across the injector is 53-10=43psi.
During vacuum, say -5psi, the fuel pressure is 43+(-5)=38psi. The injectors see -5psi on one side, and 38psi on the other. So the pressure drop across the injector is 38-(-5)=43psi.
Now a rising rate regulator is going to be something other than 1:1, such as 1:4. In this case, fuel pressure increases 4psi for every 1psi of boost.
So, at 0psi of boost the fuel pressure is 43psi. But, with the 1:4 regulator, at 10psi of boost, fuel pressure is now 43+10*4=83psi.
#26
Professional Hoon
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 7,090
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Most fuel pressure regulators are a 1:1 rate (not rising-rate). This keeps the pressure delta across the injectors the same regardless of boost pressure, or vacuum.
I.E. At 0psi of boost, the fuel pressure is, say, 43psi. The injectors have 0psi on one side, and 43psi on the other. So the pressure drop across the injectors is 43-0=43psi.
At 10psi of boost, the fuel pressure is 43+10=53psi. The injectors see 10psi on one side, and 53psi on the other. So the pressure drop across the injector is 53-10=43psi.
During vacuum, say -5psi, the fuel pressure is 43+(-5)=38psi. The injectors see -5psi on one side, and 38psi on the other. So the pressure drop across the injector is 38-(-5)=43psi.
Now a rising rate regulator is going to be something other than 1:1, such as 1:4. In this case, fuel pressure increases 4psi for every 1psi of boost.
So, at 0psi of boost the fuel pressure is 43psi. But, with the 1:4 regulator, at 10psi of boost, fuel pressure is now 43+10*4=83psi.
I.E. At 0psi of boost, the fuel pressure is, say, 43psi. The injectors have 0psi on one side, and 43psi on the other. So the pressure drop across the injectors is 43-0=43psi.
At 10psi of boost, the fuel pressure is 43+10=53psi. The injectors see 10psi on one side, and 53psi on the other. So the pressure drop across the injector is 53-10=43psi.
During vacuum, say -5psi, the fuel pressure is 43+(-5)=38psi. The injectors see -5psi on one side, and 38psi on the other. So the pressure drop across the injector is 38-(-5)=43psi.
Now a rising rate regulator is going to be something other than 1:1, such as 1:4. In this case, fuel pressure increases 4psi for every 1psi of boost.
So, at 0psi of boost the fuel pressure is 43psi. But, with the 1:4 regulator, at 10psi of boost, fuel pressure is now 43+10*4=83psi.
So regardless, this guys injectors are to small.
#27
Professional Hoon
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 7,090
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
It's not really a rising rate FPR. It's 1-1
When dealing with pressure, it's about the pressure differential. The MAP cancels out the added pressure.
Imagine 0/0 nothing comes out. Same happens when 25/25. The base pressure is the only real pressure.
A rising rate uses a different rate ie 2:1 etc
When dealing with pressure, it's about the pressure differential. The MAP cancels out the added pressure.
Imagine 0/0 nothing comes out. Same happens when 25/25. The base pressure is the only real pressure.
A rising rate uses a different rate ie 2:1 etc
#28
Rennlist Member
I think it's important not to get too hung-up on a particular figure.
I'm trying to optimise a 2.5 litre - but within set parameters i.e boost pressure which is comaptible with pump fuel & good reliability & retaining the stock RPM range so as to ensure valve-train life.
I'm aiming to maximise the VE within those constaints - the ultimate power figure will be whatever it turns out to be, but the driveability has to be top notch - minimal lag, a widish torque/power band and a strong top-end.
Forget shooting for a specific number - it can result in making some unacceptable compromises.
I'd have thought 400 rwhp for a 2.5 would be a very impressive figure! Not that it matters!
I'm trying to optimise a 2.5 litre - but within set parameters i.e boost pressure which is comaptible with pump fuel & good reliability & retaining the stock RPM range so as to ensure valve-train life.
I'm aiming to maximise the VE within those constaints - the ultimate power figure will be whatever it turns out to be, but the driveability has to be top notch - minimal lag, a widish torque/power band and a strong top-end.
Forget shooting for a specific number - it can result in making some unacceptable compromises.
I'd have thought 400 rwhp for a 2.5 would be a very impressive figure! Not that it matters!
#29
Rennlist Member
I think it's important not to get too hung-up on a particular figure.
I'm trying to optimise a 2.5 litre - but within set parameters i.e boost pressure which is comaptible with pump fuel & good reliability & retaining the stock RPM range so as to ensure valve-train life.
I'm aiming to maximise the VE within those constaints - the ultimate power figure will be whatever it turns out to be, but the driveability has to be top notch - minimal lag, a widish torque/power band and a strong top-end.
Forget shooting for a specific number - it can result in making some unacceptable compromises.
I'd have thought 400 rwhp for a 2.5 would be a very impressive figure! Not that it matters!
I'm trying to optimise a 2.5 litre - but within set parameters i.e boost pressure which is comaptible with pump fuel & good reliability & retaining the stock RPM range so as to ensure valve-train life.
I'm aiming to maximise the VE within those constaints - the ultimate power figure will be whatever it turns out to be, but the driveability has to be top notch - minimal lag, a widish torque/power band and a strong top-end.
Forget shooting for a specific number - it can result in making some unacceptable compromises.
I'd have thought 400 rwhp for a 2.5 would be a very impressive figure! Not that it matters!
#30
well those numbers came off of dyno charts so they either got the correction screwed up or they lied about the mods on several of their customers cars for some reason. i definitely see what your saying but i dont see why i cant get similar if not the same or better with what i have done. seeing as its more then a lot of those had listed. would like to make 500hp but would be plenty happy in the 400 range like those dyno charts show.