Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

Just curious about you 3.0L+ guys

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-06-2013 | 01:33 PM
  #91  
Rogue_Ant's Avatar
Rogue_Ant
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist
Small Business Partner

 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 5,252
Likes: 6
From: Denver
Default

Originally Posted by blade7
I cant really see the logic in building a 3.0 engine unless you plan to keep the car for a very long time, barring unexpected wealth or poverty I wouldn't sell the engine.
IMO, possibly the best reason for building a stroker motor is to make it non-interference... That said, the added stroke makes for a much more driveable car.
Old 07-06-2013 | 02:37 PM
  #92  
Darwantae951's Avatar
Darwantae951

 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 11,034
Likes: 25
Default

Originally Posted by Rogue_Ant
IMO, possibly the best reason for building a stroker motor is to make it non-interference... That said, the added stroke makes for a much more driveable car.
+1

I don't care much for the anemic feel of the 2.5s anymore.
Old 07-06-2013 | 03:54 PM
  #93  
blade7's Avatar
blade7
Drifting
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,267
Likes: 35
From: England UK
Default

Originally Posted by Rogue_Ant
IMO, possibly the best reason for building a stroker motor is to make it non-interference... That said, the added stroke makes for a much more driveable car.
Standard 104mm X 88mm due to the parts I already have so unless it's possible via piston crown design it wont be non-interference. Not a problem to change the belts every 3 years/8k miles for me.



Quick Reply: Just curious about you 3.0L+ guys



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:05 AM.