Colorado Dyno Day! (updated, with video)
#31
Wax On, Wax Off
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2003
Location: 5280 ft above the sea
Posts: 17,727
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
No sir I do not, other than what's written on the chart, of which it says SAE.
91 octane pump gas, and no charts showing boost pressure sadly. I peaked at 18 PSI, and it bled off to 14 by the end of the pull at 6500 RPM.
It drives so ridiculously smoothly! Next cars and coffee I'll let ya drive it. night and day difference!
#32
#33
#34
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Ok so on your car you did pulls with the A tune and the M tune? I'm guessing the same boost @ 18psi dropping to 14?
Those are great numbers for a 26/8 and the M tune. Were you running the piggyback? The first dyno posted that you were hoping to beat, what mods were on for that pull?
Those are great numbers for a 26/8 and the M tune. Were you running the piggyback? The first dyno posted that you were hoping to beat, what mods were on for that pull?
#35
Wax On, Wax Off
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2003
Location: 5280 ft above the sea
Posts: 17,727
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Ok so on your car you did pulls with the A tune and the M tune? I'm guessing the same boost @ 18psi dropping to 14?
Those are great numbers for a 26/8 and the M tune. Were you running the piggyback? The first dyno posted that you were hoping to beat, what mods were on for that pull?
Those are great numbers for a 26/8 and the M tune. Were you running the piggyback? The first dyno posted that you were hoping to beat, what mods were on for that pull?
The M-tune had no piggy back, it's simply the planned setup that Rogue has for the final product of the M-tune, and his injectors. The intake, MAF, MAP, chip, and the 80# high impedance injectors, and a 3.0 BAR FPR.
The first chart I posted was with Vitesse AFM chips, apparently a mis-labeled 3.8 BAR FPR (why I was running so rich...thought it was a 3.0 BAR), Lindsey stage II intercooler, Tial wastegate, and boost controller.
#38
#42
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I should have went to this dyno day. Instead I was cleaning wheels and trying to repair a sprinkler system.
I have used a Dynodynamics dyno on my car and a comparision to the DD would be interesting.
As for the question posed, I would suspect that the correct factor was around .22 to .25. This means around 255rwhp uncorrected (assuming 0.22). From what I have typically seen on Dynos in Denver 0.20 to .30 is kinda the extremes with 0.22 to 0.25 being pretty common.
-Dana
I have used a Dynodynamics dyno on my car and a comparision to the DD would be interesting.
As for the question posed, I would suspect that the correct factor was around .22 to .25. This means around 255rwhp uncorrected (assuming 0.22). From what I have typically seen on Dynos in Denver 0.20 to .30 is kinda the extremes with 0.22 to 0.25 being pretty common.
-Dana
#43
Nordschleife Master
#44
Wax On, Wax Off
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2003
Location: 5280 ft above the sea
Posts: 17,727
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I've had it on my car thru 1 tank to date, and I averaged 15 MPG because I love hearing my turbo spool...and the bypass valve releasing the pressure... this next tank should be *MUCH* better as I'm trying to drive in a somewhat sane manner